Say what it encloses.

An orbital picture is not a picture of a cloud. It is a contour — the surface on which the wavefunction takes one chosen value — and the value was chosen by whoever drew it. "The ninety per cent surface" is the stock phrase and very often not what has been plotted, because nobody did the integral. These are essays about molecular shape and bonding with the integrals done: every orbital here is drawn at a level found by integrating the density, and says what fraction it encloses.

The 2pz orbitalThe 2pz orbital at the contour enclosing 90 per cent of its density — a level solved for by integration rather than chosen. The two colours are the two signs of the wavefunction, which is what distinguishes a bonding interaction from an antibonding one.2pzencloses 90% of the densitycontour at |ψ| = 9.48e-30 radial nodes1 angular nodecontour solved for by integrating the density1 shell · one electron
Fig. 1 A 2p orbital at the contour enclosing ninety per cent of its density — a level solved for rather than picked. The two lobes are drawn in different colours because they differ in the sign of the wavefunction, which is the whole of what makes one interaction bonding and another antibonding, and a picture of the magnitude alone has thrown it away.

Start anywhere

19 essays

2pzencloses 90% of the densitycontour at |ψ| = 9.48e-30 radial nodes1 angular nodecontour solved for by integrating the density1 shell · one electron Orbitals

What an orbital is

Not a region the electron occupies, not a path it follows, and for any atom but hydrogen not an exact anything. An orbital is a one-electron wavefunction, and almost every difficulty in this subject comes from forgetting that.

7 figures
tetrahedral109.47° × 6repulsion minimised, angles measured off the result4 sites Where the atoms go

VSEPR, computed

The tetrahedral angle is not 109.5 degrees because a textbook says so. It is arccos(−1/3), and it falls out of minimising the repulsion of four points on a sphere without ever being written down.

6 figures
1s · 1sS = 0.38997sigma interactionseparation 2.8 bohrcontours at 50% of each densitythe signed product integrated over all spaceone electron Bonding models

Overlap decides

Two orbitals interact in proportion to how much they overlap, and the sign of the overlap decides which of the two combinations is the lower in energy. It is one integral, and almost everything about bonding follows from it.

6 figures
HHHNC3vprincipal axis C33 mirror planesno inversion centremay be polarcannot be chiralgroup recovered from the coordinates4 atoms What symmetry decides

Point groups from coordinates

A molecule's symmetry is not a label to be looked up. It is decidable from the atom positions by searching for the operations that permute them, and the search either finds an operation or it does not.

7 figures
FFFSFFFOhprincipal axis C49 mirror planeshas an inversion centrecannot be polarcannot be chiralgroup recovered from the coordinates7 atoms Beyond the octet

Hypervalency without d orbitals

Sulfur hexafluoride is not d²sp³ hybridised. The d orbitals are far too high in energy to contribute meaningfully, the bonding is three-centre four-electron, and the textbook account has been known to be wrong for fifty years.

7 figures
HHCHHTdprincipal axis C36 mirror planesno inversion centrecannot be polarcannot be chiralgroup recovered from the coordinates5 atoms What is taught wrongly

Hybridisation does not explain

Methane's photoelectron spectrum has two bands, not one. Four equivalent sp³ bonding orbitals cannot produce that, and the resolution is that hybridisation was never a claim about what a measurement would find.

6 figures
50% of the density|ψ| = 1.48e-190% of the density|ψ| = 3.94e-299% of the density|ψ| = 8.44e-31slevels solved for by integration, drawn at one scale Orbitals

Say what it encloses

An orbital picture is a contour at a level somebody chose, and almost no source says which. Two textbooks can draw the same orbital at visibly different sizes with the same caption, and both be printed in good faith.

7 figures
axial — 2 sitesneighbours at 90°, 90°, 90°, 180°equatorial — 3 sitesneighbours at 90°, 90°, 120°, 120°the two are not equivalentneighbour angles measured, not assumed5 sites Where the atoms go

Five sites are not alike

Every other common arrangement has one or two distinct angles. Five has three, because two of its positions are on an axis and three are round an equator — and a molecule built that way does something about it.

6 figures
1s · 2pxS = 0 exactlycomputed -9.6e-17 — arithmetic noiseseparation 2.8 bohrcontours at 50% of each densitythe contributions cancel in pairs, so the integral vanishesone electron Bonding models

Exactly zero

Where symmetry forbids an interaction the overlap is not small. It is zero — and computing it and finding arithmetic noise is a different kind of statement from computing it and finding a small number.

6 figures
moleculegroupmay be polarmay be chiralwaterC2vyesno2 σcarbon dioxideD∞hnonohas iammoniaC3vyesno3 σmethaneTdnono6 σboron trifluorideD3hnono4 σhydrogen peroxideC2yesyesbromochlorofluoromethaneC1yesyesboth columns derived from the symbol, not from the bonds What symmetry decides

Symmetry forbids a dipole

Whether a molecule can have a dipole moment follows from its point group alone. The usual argument — adding up bond vectors — gets the right answer for easy cases by a route that does not generalise.

6 figures
HHCCHCCHCCHHD6hprincipal axis C67 mirror planeshas an inversion centrecannot be polarcannot be chiralgroup recovered from the coordinates12 atoms Beyond the octet

Delocalisation

Benzene does not alternate between two structures. It has one structure, and the two Kekulé forms are basis functions in a description of it — which is a different and much less exciting claim than the one usually made.

6 figures
one scale across the plate1s0 radial · 0 angular2s1 radial · 0 angular2pz0 radial · 1 angulareach level solved for separately90% · one electron What is taught wrongly

Orbitals are not where the electron is

A many-electron atom has no exact orbitals at all. The orbital picture is a basis for an approximation — an extremely good one — and treating it as a description of reality is the source of most of the confusion in this subject.

7 figures
node 1.90node 7.10most probable radius 13.10 a₀R(r)and 4πr²R²r / bohrmeasured off the computed function2 radial nodes · one electron Orbitals

Nodes

An orbital with quantum numbers n and l has exactly n−l−1 radial nodes and l angular ones. That is a count, it is exact, and it is the fastest way to catch a drawing that is wrong.

6 figures
HHOC2vprincipal axis C22 mirror planesno inversion centremay be polarcannot be chiralgroup recovered from the coordinates3 atoms Where the atoms go

Why water is bent

The standard answer is lone pair repulsion, it predicts the right direction, and it cannot predict the magnitude. A better rule can, and the heavier hydrides show where both accounts run out.

6 figures
sp3109.471°between every pair4 hybridsworst off-diagonal 0e+0an orthogonal transformation of the atomic orbitalsone electron Bonding models

Hybrids are a basis

An sp³ hybrid set is an orthogonal matrix applied to the atomic orbitals. Rotating a basis changes no observable, so asking whether the electrons are really in hybrids is asking which coordinate system nature prefers.

6 figures
BrClCHFC1no rotation axis0 mirror planesno inversion centremay be polarmay be chiralgroup recovered from the coordinates5 atoms What symmetry decides

Chirality is a symmetry statement

A molecule is chiral when its group contains no improper operation at all. The four-different-groups rule is a useful special case that misses molecules with no stereocentre and wrongly condemns some that have several.

6 figures
moleculegroupmay be polarmay be chiralwaterC2vyesno2 σcarbon dioxideD∞hnonohas iammoniaC3vyesno3 σmethaneTdnono6 σboron trifluorideD3hnono4 σhydrogen peroxideC2yesyesbromochlorofluoromethaneC1yesyesboth columns derived from the symbol, not from the bonds What is taught wrongly

The dipole is not a sum of bonds

Adding bond dipoles as vectors gets the easy cases right and rests on a quantity with several incompatible definitions. The symmetry argument is exact, needs no electronegativities, and says when the answer must be zero.

6 figures
most probable radius 1.00 a₀R(r)and 4πr²R²r / bohrmeasured off the computed function0 radial nodes · one electron Orbitals

Where the electron is

The wavefunction is largest at the nucleus, the electron is most likely to be found a bohr out, and the ninety-per-cent contour is at 2.66. Three numbers, all correct, all answering different questions.

7 figures
1s-1sσ overlapS = 0.39002pz-2pzσ overlapS = 0.45852px-2pxπ overlapS = 0.75291s-2pxsymmetry forbids itS = 0 exactlyno splittingoverlaps computed at 2.8 bohr, levels in proportionone electron Bonding models

Molecular orbital and valence bond

Two frameworks, taught as rivals, describing the same molecules. One starts from delocalised orbitals and localises; the other starts from localised bonds and delocalises. Pushed far enough they meet.

6 figures

Threads running through

themes, not chapters

Say what it encloses

An orbital picture is a contour at a level somebody chose, and almost no source says which. Every one here is drawn at a level found by integrating the density, and states the fraction it encloses.

4 essays

Exactly zero

Where symmetry forbids an interaction the overlap is not small, it is zero. Computing it and finding arithmetic noise is a different kind of statement from computing it and finding a small number.

2 essays

A basis is not a thing

Hybrid orbitals, localised bonds and canonical molecular orbitals are related by transformations that leave every observable unchanged. Arguing about which is real is arguing about a coordinate system.

5 essays

Symmetry settles it

Whether a molecule can have a dipole, or be chiral, or show a particular spectral line, follows from its point group alone — with no reference to what the bonds are made of.

7 essays

One electron only

Every orbital drawn here is a hydrogen-like solution. A many-electron atom has no exact orbitals at all, and keeping that in view is the difference between a model and a picture of reality.

3 essays

Taught confidently, and wrong

This subject has an unusual number of explanations that are memorable, widespread and false. Each is stated fairly here and then tested against a computation rather than an opinion.

12 essays

Counted, not quoted

Node counts, bond angles, overlap integrals and point groups are all computed while the figure is drawn. None of them is a number recalled from a table.

11 essays