The thread: Exactly zero

Bonding models

Overlap decides

Two orbitals interact in proportion to how much they overlap, and the sign of the overlap decides which of the two combinations is the lower in energy. It is one integral, and almost everything about bonding follows from it.

Bonding models

Exactly zero

Where symmetry forbids an interaction the overlap is not small. It is zero — and computing it and finding arithmetic noise is a different kind of statement from computing it and finding a small number.

What symmetry decides

Character tables and reduction

A molecule's point group is a list of matrices, not a label. Generating them, sorting them into classes, and dividing by the group order turns any set of orbitals into a statement about how many energies there can be.

What symmetry decides

Selection rules are one theorem

An integral over all space vanishes unless the integrand is totally symmetric. Every selection rule in spectroscopy is that sentence with a different integrand — and the rule of mutual exclusion falls out rather than being remembered.

What symmetry decides

Site symmetry, and what it constrains

A molecule's group is not the only group in the problem. Each atom sits at a position with a symmetry of its own, and what that local group permits decides how many kinds of environment a structure really has.

What a spectrum settles

What an absence proves

A band that symmetry forbids is not weak. Its intensity is zero, exactly, by a theorem — while a band that is merely too faint to see is absent for reasons no theorem covers. The two look identical in a spectrum and support completely different conclusions.

What the shape is for

Copper is never quite octahedral

A d⁹ ion in an octahedral field has three electrons in a doubly degenerate pair, which cannot be shared evenly. The energy it gains by distorting is linear in the distortion and the elastic cost is quadratic, so no stiffness holds the symmetric structure — and the four configurations with an even occupation gain exactly nothing.

What the shape is for

What couples two spins

Two magnetic ions a few ångströms apart interact far too strongly to be doing it magnetically — the dipole–dipole energy is about 0.06 wavenumbers and the measured couplings run to hundreds. What couples them is hopping, which the Pauli principle allows for antiparallel spins and forbids for parallel ones, and the exact answer is −4t²/U.

What a spectrum settles

Why a d–d band is weak

In a centrosymmetric complex the transition between the two halves of a split d shell is forbidden — exactly, by parity, with no small quantity anywhere. What makes it visible at all is that the molecule is never quite centrosymmetric, and the computation says which vibrations do the work.

Beyond the octet

Two kinds of correlation, and only one is small

Correlation energy is defined as a subtraction, and the definition hides that the thing subtracted is not one thing. In the two-site model the local power of the correlation energy in the interaction falls from two to one — and at every interaction strength it equals, exactly, the occupation of the bonding natural orbital.

Bonding models

Closer is not more overlap

Two 1s orbitals overlap more the closer they are, and every curve drawn from that pair says the same thing. Put a radial node into one of them and the rule fails: a 1s with a 2s overlaps by 0.016 at contact, by 0.282 near four bohr, and less again beyond — and two 2p orbitals head-on change sign at 5.06 bohr and are more strongly coupled at eight bohr than at four.

What symmetry decides

The ring's levels are its group's characters

The Hückel energies of a cyclic system are twice the real part of the characters of its own rotation group, so the level pattern — one level, then pairs, then one more if the ring is even — is a group theorem rather than a calculation. Hückel's 4n+2 rule is a statement about the representations of a cyclic group and about nothing else.

What is taught wrongly

A full band is not an insulator

Two electrons per atom, two orbitals per atom, and the lower set exactly full: the count says insulator, and magnesium is a metal. The count is not wrong about the count. What it assumes is that the two sets of levels occupy separate ranges of energy, and whether they do is a comparison of four numbers that has nothing to do with how many electrons there are.

When the molecule does not stop

One defect is a level, many are a band

A single deepened site in a chain pulls one state out of the band to −√(h² + 4), exactly, and holds it on 1.42 sites. Put in more and the levels spread: at one site in ten they span 1.45 in the same units and have closed to within 0.69 of the host band, and above one site in eight the count of levels stops matching the count of defects, because two defects on neighbouring sites push one of their pair back into the band.

When the molecule does not stop

Two structures with the same neighbours

Five structures in which every atom has exactly four neighbours. Their second moments are 4.000 to nine decimal places, because that identity is the coordination and nothing else. Their bindings per site run from 1.2756 to 1.6363 — a spread of twenty-two per cent — and two of them that agree on the second, third and fourth moments together still differ in the third decimal place.

What symmetry decides

The one intensity symmetry does fix

Symmetry says which bands exist and declines to say how strong they are. It makes exactly one exception, and it is a ratio: every Raman band that is not totally symmetric is depolarised by exactly three quarters, whatever the molecule and whatever the model — and methane's symmetric stretch is polarised by exactly zero, because its group is cubic.

What the shape is for

The orbital a ligand cannot reach

The sixteen-electron count of a square plane is a statement about an energy rather than about symmetry matching, so it was the count that ought to be sensitive to a π channel where the eighteen-electron one is not. It is not sensitive either — and for a sharper reason. The orbital that sets its gap is d(z²), and a square-planar ligand set contains nothing of that symmetry, so the gap is exactly 2eσ until the π strength reaches a quarter of the σ one.

What symmetry decides

A formula that predicts minus eleven vibrations

A molecule's count of totally symmetric vibrations is often explained as one per orbit of internal coordinates, less one per redundancy, with methane as the worked example. Computed for fifteen molecules it is right for seven and wrong for eight — and for sulfur hexafluoride, benzene and both ferrocenes it returns a negative number. Two independent corrections turn it into an identity.

Bonding models

A bond with nothing in the middle

Two head-on 2p functions have an overlap that changes sign at 5.03 bohr, and the picture of what that means is worth drawing. Below that separation the combination the model fills has a nodal plane through the midpoint of the bond, so two electrons in it put exactly nothing between the nuclei; above it the same model fills the other one. Which picture a bonding orbital has is decided by a separation.

What a spectrum settles

One number was one direction

The departure of a depolarisation ratio from three quarters goes as the square of a distortion, and the exponent was first measured along one bond stretch. Computed along every non-symmetric coordinate the exponent is always two and the coefficient is not: it spans a factor of thirty inside methane. And the ratio is not preferentially sensitive to the coordinates a molecule is soft along — in two molecules of three the stiffest coordinate is the most sensitive.

When the molecule does not stop

The length at which levels become a band

Two runs of low sites share a state when they are close enough, and the splitting falls exponentially over two sites. A longer chain brings some pair closer while spreading its levels thinner, so the two quantities run against each other and cross — at about a thousand sites for runs of four and eighty thousand for runs of eight. Chains of four hundred sites are far below that, which is why every gap state on them is a box.

What symmetry decides

Two events where there was one

A broken symmetry returns at a field where the coupling matches the gap it has to overcome, and in a shell with two levels that field is a single number. The next shell up has three, two gaps and two dipoles — so there are two crossovers, a factor of 3.66 apart, both of them below the single one of the shell below, and the exponent takes more than a decade of field to travel between them.

Bonding models

The node that decided a picture

A hydrogenic calculation cannot say whether formaldehyde's localised description is two bent components or σ and π, because the integral that decides it came out at 0.00718 where it should be the largest in the molecule. Replacing the hydrogenic radial functions with nodeless Slater ones moves that overlap by a factor of ninety-seven, leaves the π overlap identical to the last bit, and flips the answer: the description is bent.

What symmetry decides

Three events, and a ratio of two dipoles

The m = 0 half of a shell has two crossovers because it has three levels and two coupled pairs. The other half has two levels and one, so the whole shell has three distinct fields rather than four — and two of the three share a gap exactly, which makes the ratio between them a ratio of two dipoles, 2/√3.

What the shape is for

The ligand the rule was waiting for

A sixteen-electron complex is called reactive because it can add a ligand, and the gap that makes it sixteen points straight at where the ligand arrives. Bringing one in closes the gap exactly linearly — and leaves its exactness completely untouched, which is the opposite of what bending the same complex does.

What is taught wrongly

A bond order between atoms that do not interact

A diatomic held where its overlap changes sign has no interaction between its two orbitals at all — which is what the sign change of its overlap means. Put a third orbital beside it and the pair is still split, one line sits exactly at the free-atom energy at every third-orbital energy, and the bond order between the two runs to −0.9999. Three measures of the same bond disagree completely.

Beyond the octet

A sign change is not always a zero

The solved give-back changes sign somewhere between a neighbour repulsion of two and one of four, and a bisection looks like the way to find the value where the structure beyond contact contributes exactly nothing. It changes sign twice. One crossing is that value; at the other the quantity the fraction is a fraction of has vanished instead, and a bisection reports the two in identical words.

Orbitals

The residue is below its own noise

Two interaction terms, both negative, leave the sign a coin toss — and a larger block would settle it. There is a larger block: a model that needs no measured separations supplies twenty-one. It cannot settle anything, because a fourfold alternating difference of distances known to a quarter of an ångström cannot resolve three hundredths of one.

Beyond the octet

A count that changes at one point

Where does the orphan count step along a distortion, relative to where the energy's minimum sits? A rule that depends on an exact symmetry may have no answer for a real molecule. On the path from a tetrahedron to a square plane the count is the same at every angle up to 89.99° and changes only at 90° exactly — which is the energy's maximum, not its minimum, and a single geometry out of a continuum.

What is taught wrongly

A filled shell is not an empty statement

A bond order of −0.954 between two orbitals with no overlap and no resonance integral invites the prediction that at six electrons — every level occupied, the sum over a complete set — it would be exactly zero. It is exactly one seventh, and the reason is that a complete set in a non-orthogonal basis sums to the inverse of the overlap matrix, which has entries where the overlap has none.

What a spectrum settles

A ratio of exactly one is a tie

Does the intensity contrast fall below two at half filling? It does — it falls to exactly one. But one is the floor of a ratio between two ranked quantities, and it is reached here because the cut between fundamental and satellite lands between two lines of identical weight. The guard installed to catch that case tests the wrong degeneracy, and the guard installed to license the extrapolation cannot tell an exact answer from a divergent one.

What symmetry decides

Four angles the shell chooses

A field along one axis gives a shell of nine functions three fields with an event, and tilting the field should separate the coincident ones and raise the count towards the number of coupled pairs. It does — from three to six. But not monotonically: at four angles two events collide again, and every one of those angles is the arctangent of a ratio of the shell's own angular integrals.

When the molecule does not stop

The triangles that were never in the bands

A switch in how a gap scales is usually attributed to a band's third moment, and the attribution cannot be tested while the coupling runs along one of the bands. Separated, the bands turn out to decide nothing. Two triangular bands coupled along a matching — which cannot close a triangle across the gap — behave exactly like square ones.

What symmetry decides

None of the six was a crossing

Counting events in a tilted field finds the count rising from three to six, dropping again at four angles that are exact arctangents of the shell's own integrals. Every one of those statements is true of the two-state estimates. Diagonalising the five-level problem exactly finds one avoided crossing at every tilt, in a field that moves by a third across ninety degrees, and no feature whatever at any of the four angles.

What a spectrum settles

The distortion the ratio cannot see

A depolarisation ratio can be made into a structural probe: break a molecule's symmetry and a band fixed at three quarters comes off it by an amount that depends on the distortion. The question is whether two distortions the ratio can see separately might cancel into one it cannot. They do — and the cancellation is exact, at any size, because the blind direction is the one that keeps the symmetry.

Bonding models

The five figures were an identity

Two lone pairs satisfy the two-orbital mixing criterion by a margin of 1.732128, against √3 = 1.732051 — agreement to five figures on a number assembled from three integrals over a numerical grid. It is exact. The criterion is the reciprocal of the p amplitude of the outward hybrid, and everything else in the molecule cancels out of it.

What is taught wrongly

A symmetry holds or it does not

One level of a three-orbital trio sits at the free-atom energy exactly, at every third-orbital energy, because the antisymmetric combination of the pair has nothing of its own symmetry to mix with. Detuning one of the two by a twentieth of an electron volt moves it by half of that — first order, immediately, with no protected regime at all.

What a spectrum settles

The number the tie got right

On a ring of six the contrast at half filling comes out exactly one, and the one is an artefact — the rank cut had landed between two lines of identical weight, so the ratio was a quantity divided by itself. The chain of six has no such pair anywhere, at any repulsion, at any filling. Its contrast at half filling converges to one anyway.

What is taught wrongly

The second number is the error, rearranged

A cheap diagnostic for a composite method leaves a scatter it cannot explain, and the number that ought to close it is the change in the correlation energy, already computed at every point, so the test is arithmetic rather than a calculation. It is arithmetic, and the arithmetic is the answer. The composite's error is that change with a sign on it.

What symmetry decides

The variation was the basis

Solved in the five functions a field in one plane couples, the tilted Stark problem has one avoided crossing at every tilt and a crossing field that moves by a third across ninety degrees. Solved in the whole nine-function shell the field does not move at all — the same number at every direction, to eleven decimal places — and the thirty-four per cent was the truncation.

What a spectrum settles

One number was a direction too

The depolarisation probe is exactly blind to the totally symmetric direction, which suggests it reads the distortion's component outside that species. What is left is a plane, and over a circle in it the reading varies by a factor of 1.98 — smallest for one bond against another, largest for two bonds against one, repeating every sixty degrees.

What symmetry decides

Consistently wrong is not a limit

Does the two-state picture of a tilted Stark shell become right as the quantum defect closes the l degeneracy? Swept over two decades it does not move: one avoided crossing against eight estimates at every defect. The reason is that every dimensionless quantity settles — the crossing sits at 0.04000 of the zero-field gap and the nearest estimate at 0.9067 of the crossing, and neither is heading anywhere.

What the shape is for

It was the count, not the frustration

The free combination's exponent comes out negative on every odd ring and positive on every even ring and on an open chain, and the sign was put down to frustration. The control was a chain of eight. A chain of five is not frustrated in any sense — a chain is bipartite and every bond can be satisfied — and its exponent is −0.792.

What is taught wrongly

Five failures in five different places

Seven quantities a mean field produces for nothing have been tried as diagnostics, and none of them is usable. The question left is whether that is one finding or seven — whether the same awkward corner of the square breaks every candidate, or each is broken somewhere else. Each is broken somewhere else. Five candidates, five failing pairs, ten systems, and not one of them appearing twice.

What the shape is for

The direction the gap cannot see

A two-ligand fold opens the sixteen-electron gap and a four-ligand bend closes it, so a distortion mixing the two must pass through a direction the gap does not move along. It does, and the direction is the antisymmetric fold — one pair of trans ligands up, the other down. Its blindness is exact, because exchanging the two pairs is a symmetry of the arrangement.

What a spectrum settles

The sum was flat all along

The depolarisation reading varies by a factor of two round a circle in the non-symmetric plane, and the anisotropy may belong to taking a maximum over four bands rather than to the physics. Summing the four instead gives a reading constant to four parts in ten thousand, against a maximum that varies by ninety-eight per cent.

What symmetry decides

Five coordinates for six vibrations

A torsion is reversed by every improper operation that carries it onto itself and by no proper one, so adding torsions tests the orbit rule on a second kind of signed coordinate — and the rule holds on every molecule. It also moves hydrogen peroxide's count of totally symmetric vibrations from three to four, which a property of a molecule cannot do. Its five coordinates never spanned its six vibrations, and three of fifteen coordinate sets had been counting vibrations they did not describe.

When the molecule does not stop

The rule of thumb was on the flat part

Fitting the Peierls tail discards the first few bonds of every profile, on a rule of thumb — three coherence lengths. Does that unexamined choice hide a second exponent? It does not. From six bonds outward the fitted power moves by half a per cent to nine; below six it moves seven times as much, and starting at two would have halved the very trend the fit reports.

What the shape is for

The frustrated cluster with an even count

A parity account of the exponent's sign replaced a frustration account and left the two still confounded: every case tested had frustration and odd parity aligned. A tetrahedron of four spins is frustrated and even. Its exponent is +0.2084, and so are those of three more clusters the two accounts disagree about — but the mechanism proposed with the parity rule is refuted along with the account it replaced.

What symmetry decides

The crossing nothing couples

A tilted Stark shell's one avoided crossing settled at 0.04000 of the zero-field gap, and the natural guess was a ratio of angular integrals. With the quantum defect taken out the limit is 0.0399865, not four hundredths — and the two levels at that minimum belong to different symmetries about the field, which no element of the field connects. It was never an avoided crossing. The one minimum between levels that do interact sits at half the field, behind a level of the other kind.

What the shape is for

A blindness that is inherited

There is a direction the sixteen-electron gap does not move along, and it is tempting to call it the one a complex is softest along without paying for it. That second half is a claim about an energy the gap model has no term for. Put the ligand repulsion on the same family and the answer splits: where a symmetry fixes the blind direction the repulsion is blind to it too, exactly, and slightly downhill — and where no symmetry fixes it, the two are nearly perpendicular.

When the molecule does not stop

Three points, and they all go down

Matching five rings at one value of n·δ∞ tightens the temperature collapse from 3.41 per cent to 1.62, and what is left might be the even-site rounding rather than anything physical. At three targets the residual falls monotonically — and at the smallest one it is a third of what the rounding leaves, which the rounding cannot explain.

What symmetry decides

Two levels cannot make a minimum

The one minimum between coupled levels in a Stark shell sits at 0.0196 of the s–p gap, and the nearest two-state estimate at 0.0192 — two per cent away, which reads as the estimates having been aimed at the right feature all along. They were not. Two coupled levels only ever separate, so no estimate can be where its own pair is closest. The minimum belongs to a third level, exists only while the d level sits within a quarter of the s–p gap, and meets the estimate by crossing it.

When the molecule does not stop

The other window was a plateau too

Sweeping where the fit begins finds a plateau. The far end is the other window and nobody had swept it: inside each profile's own reach the exponent moves by at most 5.3 per cent, and past that reach every larger window returns exactly the same fit — because there are no more points to add. What the reach is depends on the stiffness, and for half the series it is an arbitrary rule rather than the physics.

What is taught wrongly

Six of fifteen change verdict

The chemical capacity is finite or infinite according to the sign of a coefficient that is one sixth of a second difference of three measurements, and the pair test asked how much of its reported ordering is the quantity and how much is the fit's resolution. Adding a fifth point changes the verdict on six of fifteen atoms — and the five it unbounds are the five it had largest.

What a spectrum settles

The second molecule with a blind spot

Methane's fifty-five force constants have ten directions no spectrum can touch, and the forty-five that are fixed were worth a table. Boron trifluoride is the only other molecule here with a redundant coordinate set, and it is not the same case: eight kinds of constant rather than five, a quarter of its field invisible rather than a fifth, and an out-of-plane coordinate the redundancy cannot reach.

What symmetry decides

The quarter, generalised

A shell's one coupled minimum exists because its d level sits within a quarter of the s–p gap, and the quarter was found by bisecting a numerical search on one shell. It is exactly 2(n² − 4)/(5(n² − 1)) for every shell — zero at the second, a quarter at the third, two fifths in the limit — while the offset it is compared against is one fifth whatever the shell.

When the molecule does not stop

A net with no two-colouring

Half filling is the easiest composition to search and the reason given was the two-colouring: on a bipartite net it is the unique arrangement with every bond unlike, so the optimum has nothing competing with it. A triangular net has no two-colouring, its half-filled composition is reached by every one of two hundred starts, and its best arrangement is two bonds short of what counting allows.

What a spectrum settles

Adding data made it worse

A projection leaves a residual spread across four starting points, and an earlier essay attributed it to the eigenvalue problem rather than to the coordinate set — an attribution rather than a measurement. Refitting with two isotopologues was the proposed test. Run, it produces a runaway to minus ninety-seven thousand that one isotopologue alone does not, and the reason is that the direction it walks along is flat at every mass.

What symmetry decides

No length separates them

A bond list here is one distance cutoff with a clause about hydrogen, added when peroxide came back with five bonds instead of three. The clause repaired one molecule. Across the twenty-three molecules drawn here, the longest bond is 2.32 ångström and the shortest pair that is not a bond is 1.51 — so no cutoff can work at all, and five molecules currently come back with no bonds.

Bonding models

A level no symmetry was protecting

A three-orbital trio keeps one level at the free-atom energy exactly, and the reason given was that its two outer orbitals are equivalent. Make them inequivalent by changing one overlap rather than one energy and the level does not move at all — not to first order, not to any order, at any energy of the third orbital. It was never the symmetry. It is allyl's non-bonding orbital, held by a count.

Where the atoms go

Two sweeps and one lever

The rotamer ceiling depends on the gauche energy and on the temperature only through their ratio, so a sweep of either traces the same curve. Measured in that one variable, the temperature sweep lies entirely inside the gauche sweep — it covered no ground the other does not, and the whole reported spread in one energy is worth a temperature swing from 196 to 353 kelvin.

Beyond the octet

The cage is on both sides

Two localisation criteria classify six cage-and-filling pairs differently, and a symmetry explanation for the six is the natural first guess. The icosahedron's graph has a hundred and twenty automorphisms, the most in the family, and supplies three of the six disagreements and nine of the agreements. What the six do have in common is sharper than a symmetry: in every one, one criterion's spread is not small but zero.

Bonding models

Three chains and ninety orderings ruled out

Two claims priced against the same predictor share its error correlation, so no correlation structure can reorder them. That makes the collection's fragility ranking three chains rather than one list — and thirty of the hundred and twenty orderings of five claims are reachable, with the other ninety forbidden before a single measured difference is looked at.

What is taught wrongly

The limit of one is a parity

A half-filled chain of six has no degenerate removal lines, and its intensity contrast still goes to one — after dipping near U = 32 and rising again to U = 128. Followed line by line, every removal line is smooth and monotone; the dip is an exact tie between two lines at U = 28.916, and the rise ends where two satellites change places. At large repulsion the lines pair up at ±E with equal weights, so the contrast goes to one exactly when the cut falls inside a pair. On a chain of four it does not, and the limit is 1.3125.

Beyond the octet

The leftover changes sides

A main-group centre brings four valence orbitals against six ligand combinations, so two are orphaned. A transition metal brings nine, so the arithmetic inverts and three metal orbitals are left instead — three at every geometry of the Bailar twist, out of decompositions that share no species. Run past the whole arrangement census, exactly one arrangement orphans anything at a metal, and it needs an f orbital to fix.

Bonding models

A denominator needs three currencies

Every price in this argument has been a price on a measured rise. A slope floor is a rise over a run, the run is computed rather than measured, and pricing it turns out to need three currencies rather than one — because one predictor's run is a graph eigenvalue, one is a convention, and one is a difference of square roots of integers that nothing defensible moves.

Beyond the octet

The gap found on purpose

A twist between two coordination arrangements passes through a point group with no character table among the twenty in use, and that was found by accident. Running every path between the arrangements — eighteen of them, two hundred and seventy geometries — finds exactly one more gap, at a group of order ten. It also finds something the search was not looking for: a group without a table had been reported as an infinite group.

Bonding models

A floor on models written in one scale

A tie asks whether two predicted values are equal and a discordance asks whether two differences have the same sign. Both are questions about order, and a strictly increasing change of scale preserves order — so both are exactly invariant under thirteen reparameterisations of all three predictors. The slope floor asks for a ratio of differences, and it moves by factors of nineteen, ten and eleven thousand.

Beyond the octet

Six disagreements and three calculations

Two localisation criteria classified six of the family's forty-eight cage-and-filling pairs differently, and three of the six were consecutive fillings of one icosahedron with spreads identical to three figures. They are not three coincidences and not one degeneracy being filled: they are one calculation, because the survey's forty-eight rows are thirty-three distinct questions.

Orbitals

The nodes in the other variable

An orbital has n − l − 1 radial nodes, and it has exactly that many in momentum too — the two radial functions are polynomials of the same degree. Nothing pairs one node with another: they are zeros of two different classical families. What is exact is the product over all of them, which is a ratio of factorials and does not depend on the nuclear charge at all.

Bonding models

The spin the count does not hold

Three orbitals in a row keep one level at the free-atom energy however the overlap of one end is changed, and at three electrons that level holds the radical's unpaired electron. Its energy does not move. Its spin does: from half on each end to 0.236 and 0.764 as one overlap goes from 0.25 to 0.45, exactly the squared ratio of the two overlaps, at every energy of the middle orbital. A coupling between the ends moves the level and cannot move the spin. The energy and the spin are answering to different things.

Beyond the octet

The basis a diagonaliser happened to return

Six of the cage family's thirty-three inputs have their occupied set cut through the middle of a degenerate shell, and the members of a degenerate shell are interchangeable. Re-orienting the shell changes nothing about the cage, the filling or the criterion — and it moves the best localisation functional by up to twenty-one per cent, moves the count of descriptions from ten to fourteen, and flips the degeneracy label on three of the six.

Orbitals

Oblate in the picture nobody draws

Every drawing of a σ bond shows a density stretched along the bond, and the position-space calculation agrees: the second moment along the axis is twice the one across it. In momentum the same orbital is flattened in the same direction, because the interference between the two centres cuts the distribution off at π over the bond length — and that cut-off is a zero a measurement could find.

Where the atoms go

The ordering a manifold picks

A position-dependent mass leaves the kinetic energy with no unique quantum form, and an earlier sweep of the five orderings in use found half a per cent between them. A one-dimensional reduction is a one-dimensional manifold, a manifold has a distinguished Laplacian, and carrying it to the flat measure lands on exactly one of those five — not the one with no extra potential, and not the one anybody reaches for.

Orbitals

The zero belongs to one determinant

A bonding orbital's momentum profile along the bond is exactly zero at π/R, and that zero reads a bond length with nothing fitted. It is a property of putting every electron into that one orbital. Any antibonding occupation fills it in linearly and drags the minimum outward, a tenth of an electron erases it, and the valence-bond wavefunction built from the same two functions never has one at any separation.

Orbitals

The zero is a parity, not a bond

A hydrogen-like σ bond has a momentum profile along its axis that vanishes at π/R, and it is natural to read that zero as a bond's signature. Built from 2p functions pointing along the axis, the σ bond carries a sine instead and sits at 83 per cent of its peak there. Which factor an orbital carries is decided by whether its inversion parity matches its atom's, and bonding has nothing to do with it.

Beyond the octet

Folding the ring does not give the orbital back

Three arrangements break the orphan count n + L − 4, all flat, and the reason given was flatness: the p orbital perpendicular to the ring has no ligand combination of its species. Fold the ring into an umbrella at any angle and that orbital becomes totally symmetric — and the count stays wrong by exactly one, for rings of four to eight. The ring offers one symmetric combination to a centre with two symmetric orbitals. Writing C₅ᵥ to see it also counts the pentagonal pyramid at last, and the formula holds there.