What's new
Essays arrive in groups rather than one at a time, and a group usually opens up a subject not covered before. Between one group and the next nothing changes, so a reader who has seen the most recent group has seen everything.
17 September 2026
19 essays on what symmetry decides, when the molecule does not stop, what a spectrum settles, what the shape is for, what is taught wrongly, bonding models, beyond the octet, where the atoms go and orbitals
Four alkalis the model cannot hold
A shell's s and p levels have a coupled minimum in an electric field when its d level sits within a threshold fraction of the s–p gap above p, and a screening model put every shell's d level at one fifth — inside the threshold from the third shell on, with more room the larger the defect. Computed from measured quantum defects, lithium keeps the minimum at every shell. Sodium, potassium, rubidium and caesium lose it at every shell, and the screening model has no member that resembles any of them.
The gap follows the winner late
On a triangular net at half filling, the arrangement that binds best was expected to be the one that opens the widest gap at the Fermi level. Across twenty cases it is, eighteen times. The two exceptions are not noise: the frustrated net's winner changes at a contrast of 3.790, from an arrangement with thirty unlike bonds to one with thirty-two, and the gaps of the two do not cross until 4.849. For a whole unit of contrast the better binder has the narrower gap.
The residual was a loop
Projecting away boron trifluoride's flat direction left four fits disagreeing by a tenth in the B–F stretch constant, and the disagreement was put down to the search or to the arithmetic. It is neither. Two frequencies cannot fix three constants in one symmetry block, so the exact fits form a closed curve along which the stretch constant runs from 3.9 to 12.1, and the four fits are four points on a short arc of it.
Purity renames the poles
A susceptibility fit's sign poles were located at one monomer impurity, two per cent, and a real sample's impurity is rarely known. Swept from half a per cent to sixteen, the couplings where the fit's nuisance parameters separate barely move for ground spins of one and above and move a tenth for doublets. But the same separation stops being a pole and becomes a zero of the exponent at a few per cent, and above six to eight per cent every singlet acquires separations of its own.
The census a bond rule was hiding
Every internal coordinate, redundancy and totally symmetric count here is built on a bond list, and the bond list came from a length cutoff that gave five molecules no bonds. Rebuilt on the radius rule, the census reaches nineteen molecules instead of fifteen, the orbit identity holds on every newcomer, ferrocene's coordinates finally span all its vibrations — and a different gap appears: no bond rule can give a square-planar centre its two out-of-plane vibrations.
The share that was read as a line
The share of defect runs sitting in a resonant pair was read as a straight line in the logarithm of the chain length, rising by a density times a reach per decade and never saturating. The exact rise is that amount times the share of runs not yet resonant. At the concentration first studied the difference is small over nine decades and large beyond them; swept to the concentration with the most runs, the rise falls to a third, and half of all runs are resonant ten orders of magnitude later than the straight line says.
Two coefficients are not a potential
A Morse curve built from measured constants gets the vibration–rotation constant αₑ short by four to fifteen per cent, and the measured αₑ and anharmonicity imply the cubic and quartic a real potential should have. Built with exactly those two coefficients and solved, the potential overshoots instead. The reason is that the Morse curve's own series, cut after its quartic, moves αₑ by a sixth to a half of the error being repaired — so a quartic cannot tell whether the shortfall was the cubic.
Five more clusters break the band
Seven spin clusters put their upper separation coupling times the ground spin plus a half inside a band from 115 to 129 cm⁻¹, which looked like a law of where a susceptibility fit's nuisance parameters decouple. Five clusters built to test it — two larger stars and three larger bipartite graphs — land inside it once. Stars drift above and bipartite graphs below, and neither the shape of the curve nor the first excitation places the separation instead.
The rule is not the lever
One exception among nineteen flagged bond pairs would need seventy-three electronegativity tables to mean anything, and a rule that flagged fewer pairs looked like the way to need fewer. Searched over sixty-one thousand boundaries, nineteen is already the fewest that misses no disputed pair; each missed pair buys a table or five; and a rule flagging a single pair would still need fourteen. The requirement lives in the correlation between the tables, which moves it nine times as far as any rule can.
Two integers made one exponent
A sum over boron trifluoride's depolarised bands is nearly isotropic, and its residual scaled as the amplitude to the 1.248 — no integer, and a two-term fit left a pattern it could not remove. Averaging each distortion with its reverse splits the residual exactly into an even half that scales as the square, to 2.005, and an odd half that scales as the first power until a fifth-order term turns it over. And the sum was a stand-in: what an unresolved pair of bands would actually show is twenty times less flat.
The limit of one is a parity
A half-filled chain of six has no degenerate removal lines, and its intensity contrast still goes to one — after dipping near U = 32 and rising again to U = 128. Followed line by line, every removal line is smooth and monotone; the dip is an exact tie between two lines at U = 28.916, and the rise ends where two satellites change places. At large repulsion the lines pair up at ±E with equal weights, so the contrast goes to one exactly when the cut falls inside a pair. On a chain of four it does not, and the limit is 1.3125.
The spin the count does not hold
Three orbitals in a row keep one level at the free-atom energy however the overlap of one end is changed, and at three electrons that level holds the radical's unpaired electron. Its energy does not move. Its spin does: from half on each end to 0.236 and 0.764 as one overlap goes from 0.25 to 0.45, exactly the squared ratio of the two overlaps, at every energy of the middle orbital. A coupling between the ends moves the level and cannot move the spin. The energy and the spin are answering to different things.
The scatter counts angular rings
Eight nine-ring chains built by turning one fusion looked like one bend moved along a molecule. They were two families: one angular ring when the turned fusion is at an end, two adjacent angular rings everywhere else. Built from stated angular rings instead, twenty-seven chains show the ring-current scatter ignores which way a ring turns, does not grow with how many turn, and is mostly explained by one count per pair — each angular ring between two rings multiplies their response by 0.60, each one under them by 0.65.
An angular ring rescales what lies beyond it
A heteroatom's influence along a chain of fused rings decays with a length near 0.7 rings, and one bend was found to change almost nothing. Counted properly, that bend was two angular rings, and counting angular rings one at a time shows what they do: the heteroatom's own ring never moves by more than one and a half per cent, the rings beyond angular fusions fall to between an eighth and a half of their response — or rise by up to two fifths — and the decay length changes by a tenth.
The long bond goes to the crowded site
Given one bond longer than the others, the repulsion model puts it axial in a trigonal bipyramid — against the rule it is usually cited for. The reason is a crowding count, and at seven sites the count reverses: the pentagonal bipyramid's crowded site is equatorial, so a long bond goes equatorial and a short one axial. PF₅'s long bonds are axial and IF₇'s are equatorial. And at seven the site a bond avoids is not even a minimum.
The zero belongs to one determinant
A bonding orbital's momentum profile along the bond is exactly zero at π/R, and that zero reads a bond length with nothing fitted. It is a property of putting every electron into that one orbital. Any antibonding occupation fills it in linearly and drags the minimum outward, a tenth of an electron erases it, and the valence-bond wavefunction built from the same two functions never has one at any separation.
Folding the ring does not give the orbital back
Three arrangements break the orphan count n + L − 4, all flat, and the reason given was flatness: the p orbital perpendicular to the ring has no ligand combination of its species. Fold the ring into an umbrella at any angle and that orbital becomes totally symmetric — and the count stays wrong by exactly one, for rings of four to eight. The ring offers one symmetric combination to a centre with two symmetric orbitals. Writing C₅ᵥ to see it also counts the pentagonal pyramid at last, and the formula holds there.
The zero is a parity, not a bond
A hydrogen-like σ bond has a momentum profile along its axis that vanishes at π/R, and it is natural to read that zero as a bond's signature. Built from 2p functions pointing along the axis, the σ bond carries a sine instead and sits at 83 per cent of its peak there. Which factor an orbital carries is decided by whether its inversion parity matches its atom's, and bonding has nothing to do with it.
Length did not rescue the consecutive triples
On four fragments, keeping only the consecutive triples of a counterpoise assembly worked for two arrangements and did worse than pairs for the uniform chain, and a short chain was the obvious excuse. Carried to eight fragments the excuse fails: the uniform chain's consecutive assembly settles at 48 per cent of the line against 68 for pairs. And the heavy-outside chain turns the lesson over — from five fragments every triple together covers less than the consecutive ones alone.
Before that
Everything published earlier, newest first. Titles only — the cards are on the full listing.
16 September 2026
19 essays on what is taught wrongly, what symmetry decides, what a spectrum settles, when the molecule does not stop, what the shape is for, bonding models, beyond the octet, orbitals and where the atoms go
- Six of fifteen change verdict — what is taught wrongly
- The quarter, generalised — what symmetry decides
- The second molecule with a blind spot — what a spectrum settles
- A net with no two-colouring — when the molecule does not stop
- Adding data made it worse — what a spectrum settles
- No length separates them — what symmetry decides
- The correction that moves three of them backwards — what the shape is for
- A size the fit was not made from — what is taught wrongly
- The channel that points at the metal — what the shape is for
- Four quantities go and one question stays — what is taught wrongly
- Three chains and ninety orderings ruled out — bonding models
- A denominator needs three currencies — bonding models
- A floor on models written in one scale — bonding models
- Six disagreements and three calculations — beyond the octet
- The nodes in the other variable — orbitals
- The two that are not on the line — where the atoms go
- Oblate in the picture nobody draws — orbitals
- The basis a diagonaliser happened to return — beyond the octet
- The ordering a manifold picks — where the atoms go
13 September 2026
9 essays on what symmetry decides, what a spectrum settles, what is taught wrongly, what the shape is for, bonding models, where the atoms go and orbitals
- The crossing nothing couples — what symmetry decides
- The cubic a Morse curve guesses — what a spectrum settles
- No panel of this kind can find an exception — what is taught wrongly
- Two levels cannot make a minimum — what symmetry decides
- The sign rule holds between two poles — what the shape is for
- A level no symmetry was protecting — bonding models
- An ordering worth half a per cent — where the atoms go
- Deuterium cannot tell the masses apart — where the atoms go
- Three contractions for one shell — orbitals
12 September 2026
5 essays on what symmetry decides and orbitals
- Five coordinates for six vibrations — what symmetry decides
- The overshoot was one arrangement — orbitals
- A repair that costs more than the whole — orbitals
- The sum of the exponents, not the softer ion — orbitals
- One contraction for two conditions — orbitals
11 September 2026
13 essays on what symmetry decides, what the shape is for, where the atoms go and beyond the octet
- The variation was the basis — what symmetry decides
- Consistently wrong is not a limit — what symmetry decides
- The frustrated cluster with an even count — what the shape is for
- A blindness that is inherited — what the shape is for
- A barrier is not what a splitting measures — where the atoms go
- The exponent that runs both ways — where the atoms go
- It was never the mass — where the atoms go
- The mass nobody chose — where the atoms go
- The lever that was supposed to be smaller — where the atoms go
- The cage is on both sides — beyond the octet
- Two sweeps and one lever — where the atoms go
- The leftover changes sides — beyond the octet
- The gap found on purpose — beyond the octet
8 September 2026
50 essays on where the atoms go, beyond the octet, orbitals, what the shape is for, bonding models, what a spectrum settles, what symmetry decides, what is taught wrongly and when the molecule does not stop
- A dispute is a small difference — where the atoms go
- One number decides which way it breaks — where the atoms go
- Expensive is not the same as unadopted — beyond the octet
- The correction that gets harder to assemble — orbitals
- A gap that was a choice of bonds — where the atoms go
- The ligand the rule was waiting for — what the shape is for
- Fifty descriptions of one molecule — beyond the octet
- One basis size where it is worth doing — orbitals
- The distortion that opens the gap — what the shape is for
- The reach is the molecule's — bonding models
- A sign change is not always a zero — beyond the octet
- The residue is below its own noise — orbitals
- The overlap the model is not proportional to — what the shape is for
- A ratio of exactly one is a tie — what a spectrum settles
- Four angles the shell chooses — what symmetry decides
- The error bar that would be needed — bonding models
- A count that changes at one point — beyond the octet
- The sign a frustrated ring changes — what the shape is for
- The distortion the ratio cannot see — what a spectrum settles
- None of the six was a crossing — what symmetry decides
- The five figures were an identity — bonding models
- Counting was right except where it mattered — beyond the octet
- The group nobody wrote a table for — beyond the octet
- The second number is the error, rearranged — what is taught wrongly
- The number the tie got right — what a spectrum settles
- The other end of the bracket is not a number — bonding models
- A contraction that cannot reach three of them — what the shape is for
- The count the table was hiding — beyond the octet
- The exponent was the floor — when the molecule does not stop
- A correlation is not an account — what is taught wrongly
- It was the count, not the frustration — what the shape is for
- One number was a direction too — what a spectrum settles
- A bend is not an end — bonding models
- The count that was never written down — where the atoms go
- Five rings that were five different sizes — when the molecule does not stop
- Five failures in five different places — what is taught wrongly
- The sum was flat all along — what a spectrum settles
- The direction the gap cannot see — what the shape is for
- The suspect that did not fit — what a spectrum settles
- The worst of the six was the one we asked about — what is taught wrongly
- The rule of thumb was on the flat part — when the molecule does not stop
- The window that was not a plateau — when the molecule does not stop
- Three points, and they all go down — when the molecule does not stop
- Two numbers caught what one could not — where the atoms go
- The other window was a plateau too — when the molecule does not stop
- The line was holding the answer up — orbitals
- The ranking moved and the headline did not — bonding models
- The error was the row, not the charge — orbitals
- The criterion that has never said no — bonding models
- A second criterion left a gap too — beyond the octet
5 September 2026
10 essays on what a spectrum settles, what symmetry decides, when the molecule does not stop and what is taught wrongly
- Two moments about two different lines — what a spectrum settles
- An end effect with two signs — what symmetry decides
- Seven points that looked like a switch — when the molecule does not stop
- The term a harmonic field cannot produce — what a spectrum settles
- One integer, and everything it changes — what symmetry decides
- The triangles that were never in the bands — when the molecule does not stop
- A filled shell is not an empty statement — what is taught wrongly
- A count rather than an average — when the molecule does not stop
- A symmetry holds or it does not — what is taught wrongly
- The composition that is hard is not the full one — when the molecule does not stop
1 September 2026
20 essays on where the atoms go, orbitals, beyond the octet, what a spectrum settles, what symmetry decides, when the molecule does not stop, what the shape is for, what is taught wrongly and bonding models
- Four tables and one molecule to disagree about — where the atoms go
- A verdict inside its own error bar — where the atoms go
- The assembly that counts one share twice — orbitals
- The give-back that turned into a saving — beyond the octet
- A contrast with a closed form — what a spectrum settles
- Neither of the two separations — what symmetry decides
- The constant that belonged to one net — when the molecule does not stop
- The gap that only a tetrahedron closes — what the shape is for
- The residue that is two numbers — orbitals
- Three shapes from one search — beyond the octet
- A denominator that fails both ways — what the shape is for
- The amplitude the collapse left behind — what is taught wrongly
- The axis that goes the other way — what a spectrum settles
- The floor was in the bookkeeping — bonding models
- Three events, and a ratio of two dipoles — what symmetry decides
- Twelve basins where there were two — when the molecule does not stop
- A band that is a hundred and seventy decades of nothing — when the molecule does not stop
- An interior maximum a third orbital allows — bonding models
- The half of the square a ring of four cannot show — what is taught wrongly
- A bond order between atoms that do not interact — what is taught wrongly
31 August 2026
20 essays on where the atoms go, orbitals, what a spectrum settles, what the shape is for, beyond the octet, when the molecule does not stop, what symmetry decides, bonding models and what is taught wrongly
- The curve between two rows — where the atoms go
- A size a confound cannot supply — orbitals
- The forty-five that are fixed — what a spectrum settles
- The product a curve measures — what the shape is for
- The square that wastes an orbital — beyond the octet
- A decay that keeps slowing down — when the molecule does not stop
- A formula that predicts minus eleven vibrations — what symmetry decides
- An expression for what was a warning — what a spectrum settles
- The half that cannot be computed — orbitals
- The orbital a ligand cannot reach — what the shape is for
- The pair that is not a tie — bonding models
- Where the count stops being an effort — beyond the octet
- A bond with nothing in the middle — bonding models
- A capacity that is largest where there is none — what is taught wrongly
- One number was one direction — what a spectrum settles
- The gap that would have to be smaller — what the shape is for
- The length at which levels become a band — when the molecule does not stop
- Two events where there was one — what symmetry decides
- A satellite that never loses its place — what is taught wrongly
- The node that decided a picture — bonding models
30 August 2026
20 essays on orbitals, bonding models, where the atoms go, what the shape is for, what symmetry decides, what a spectrum settles, beyond the octet, what is taught wrongly and when the molecule does not stop
- A control that outranked the mechanism — orbitals
- An anomaly that is not the first of a series — bonding models
- An estimate that can be wrong by two — where the atoms go
- How many parameters a curve is worth — what the shape is for
- Ten directions no frequency can see — what symmetry decides
- The correction that was invented — what a spectrum settles
- Two models that disagree about the shape — beyond the octet
- A correction that is two functions — orbitals
- A label that prices nothing — what symmetry decides
- Half of it is given back at one bond — beyond the octet
- The boundary belongs to the gap — what a spectrum settles
- The count that cannot be broken by strength — what the shape is for
- The exponent was the window's — what is taught wrongly
- Two systems a model cannot tell apart — bonding models
- Two ways of being second order — when the molecule does not stop
- A particle in a box the alloy made — when the molecule does not stop
- A reach that has no length — what symmetry decides
- The angle that does not have to be searched for — bonding models
- Where a closed form stops being one — what is taught wrongly
- A regime that belongs to the neighbours — what is taught wrongly
28 August 2026
20 essays on where the atoms go, orbitals, what a spectrum settles, what is taught wrongly, bonding models, what the shape is for, beyond the octet, what symmetry decides and when the molecule does not stop
- A ceiling that rises where the measurements fall — where the atoms go
- A correction computed at one length — orbitals
- A hundred lines and no way to sort them — what a spectrum settles
- A mean that is low rather than right — what is taught wrongly
- A parameter that never finds a value — bonding models
- An integer nobody measured — what the shape is for
- The answer a search is most likely to give — beyond the octet
- The current does not divide — what symmetry decides
- Two bands, if the chain is short enough — when the molecule does not stop
- A ratio that squares what it measures — what a spectrum settles
- How nearly a broken symmetry survives — what symmetry decides
- The arrangement a count cannot pick — when the molecule does not stop
- The hybrids that point outside the bonds — bonding models
- The integral that cannot count electrons — what the shape is for
- The surface a neighbour moves — orbitals
- The table that could not have mattered — where the atoms go
- The warning a cheap calculation gives — what is taught wrongly
- Where the electrons are, without subtracting anything — beyond the octet
- The carriers a distortion was hiding — what is taught wrongly
- The chain distorts hardest where it stops — when the molecule does not stop
27 August 2026
15 essays on beyond the octet, what a spectrum settles, bonding models, what is taught wrongly, orbitals, when the molecule does not stop, what symmetry decides, what the shape is for and where the atoms go
- How many descriptions a cage has — beyond the octet
- The coordinate an isotope reports — what a spectrum settles
- The frame that was allowed to relax — bonding models
- The metal a thermometer cannot find — what is taught wrongly
- The surface a table draws — orbitals
- Two bands, and the shape of each — when the molecule does not stop
- A mixture is not the average of its ends — when the molecule does not stop
- More bands than there are orbitals — what a spectrum settles
- The basis the other atom lent — orbitals
- The coordinate it was already soft along — what symmetry decides
- The correction that was computed somewhere else — what is taught wrongly
- The count is the population — beyond the octet
- The distortion the ends decide — what the shape is for
- The explanation with the wrong sign — where the atoms go
- The value that only exists in the bond — bonding models
26 August 2026
14 essays on where the atoms go, what symmetry decides, when the molecule does not stop, what a spectrum settles, beyond the octet, orbitals, what is taught wrongly, what the shape is for and bonding models
- The mode that moves least radiates most — where the atoms go
- Two rules that share no arithmetic — what symmetry decides
- A band becomes a bell curve — when the molecule does not stop
- A band is a filter on the modes — what a spectrum settles
- More coordinates than motions — what symmetry decides
- One scale, from two centres to a cage — beyond the octet
- The radius that was tabulated — orbitals
- The same overlap, a different bond — what is taught wrongly
- The splitting against something structural — what the shape is for
- Three bent bonds, and the same hybrid — where the atoms go
- Which numbers carry a frame — bonding models
- The model is what is fitted — what the shape is for
- The one intensity symmetry does fix — what symmetry decides
- Two distortions in one coordinate — where the atoms go
24 August 2026
15 essays on what symmetry decides, when the molecule does not stop, where the atoms go, orbitals, bonding models, beyond the octet, what is taught wrongly, what a spectrum settles and what the shape is for
- How far, and along which coordinate — what symmetry decides
- One defect is a level, many are a band — when the molecule does not stop
- The atoms that meet across a ring — where the atoms go
- The property that gets worse — orbitals
- The quantity no scale prints — bonding models
- The reference decides the correlation — beyond the octet
- The third way to be an insulator — what is taught wrongly
- The width of a band is a bond length — what a spectrum settles
- Four is all that s and p can match — beyond the octet
- One spectrum, a line of models — bonding models
- The same count, two oxidation states — what the shape is for
- The tenth that is not drawn — orbitals
- Three numbers is not a structure — what a spectrum settles
- Two structures with the same neighbours — when the molecule does not stop
- Two wrong numbers and a right difference — what is taught wrongly
23 August 2026
15 essays on where the atoms go, beyond the octet, what a spectrum settles, what the shape is for, orbitals, what symmetry decides, bonding models and what is taught wrongly
- A dipole is not what an infrared spectrum sees — where the atoms go
- A stabilisation is measured from somewhere — beyond the octet
- How much of a band is a bond stretch — what a spectrum settles
- The count that is not always eighteen — what the shape is for
- The measurement a basis was not fitted to — orbitals
- The symmetry that is not a rotation — what symmetry decides
- A bond is not two atoms overlapping — orbitals
- A distortion needs two states — what the shape is for
- A mean field cannot get out of the way — beyond the octet
- A weight that depends on how it is weighed — bonding models
- How much symmetry is left — what symmetry decides
- The bond length that depends on the isotope — what is taught wrongly
- The strain that is not in the angles — where the atoms go
- The top that reports all three — what a spectrum settles
- The moment a fit invents — what the shape is for
21 August 2026
30 essays on orbitals, what the shape is for, what symmetry decides, where the atoms go, beyond the octet, bonding models, what a spectrum settles, what is taught wrongly and when the molecule does not stop
- A contraction is a decision made once — orbitals
- The bonds are what is left over — what the shape is for
- The group of a molecule that will not hold still — what symmetry decides
- The sites are not the same size — where the atoms go
- Two kinds of correlation, and only one is small — beyond the octet
- A slice is not the surface — orbitals
- Four centres, and the pair that will not localise — beyond the octet
- One table, three groups — what symmetry decides
- The double bond a ring cannot hold — where the atoms go
- The g-value is the orbital coming back — what the shape is for
- Hypervalency does not stop at three centres — beyond the octet
- The electrons repel less inside the complex — what the shape is for
- The orbital in momentum space — orbitals
- The ring's levels are its group's characters — what symmetry decides
- Zero dipole is not no interaction — where the atoms go
- Closer is not more overlap — bonding models
- When a mode becomes a bond stretch — what a spectrum settles
- A function that is already there — orbitals
- A moment between two integers — what the shape is for
- A surface is not a count of broken bonds — what is taught wrongly
- A third kind of correlation — beyond the octet
- The atoms are not at the points — where the atoms go
- The constant a spectrum cannot see — what a spectrum settles
- The degeneracy no group predicts — what symmetry decides
- Two bent bonds, or a σ and a π — bonding models
- Where the states pile up — when the molecule does not stop
- A difference does not make a transfer — bonding models
- A full band is not an insulator — what is taught wrongly
- The distortion the filling chooses — when the molecule does not stop
- A vacancy is not an impurity — when the molecule does not stop
19 August 2026
15 essays on what the shape is for, beyond the octet, orbitals, where the atoms go, what symmetry decides, what a spectrum settles, bonding models and what is taught wrongly
- An orbital carries no angular momentum — what the shape is for
- Hypervalency is about the ligands — beyond the octet
- The isovalue nobody chose — orbitals
- The ring that cannot hold still — where the atoms go
- The tolerance is a decision — what symmetry decides
- A Gaussian is the wrong shape — orbitals
- The double hump and what removes it — what the shape is for
- The hexagon is the frame's doing — beyond the octet
- The lone pair is not the missing term — where the atoms go
- The projector is unique, the basis is not — what symmetry decides
- Mutual exclusion does not prove a centre — what a spectrum settles
- Two pictures, one plane — bonding models
- A method that is not additive — bonding models
- The rotor that stretches — what a spectrum settles
- Koopmans' theorem is exact for nothing — what is taught wrongly
18 August 2026
15 essays on beyond the octet, where the atoms go, orbitals, what symmetry decides, what the shape is for, what a spectrum settles, what is taught wrongly and when the molecule does not stop
- The ring with a twist in it — beyond the octet
- What a dipole cannot tell apart — where the atoms go
- A cage needs one pair more than it has corners — beyond the octet
- A filled shell has no shape — orbitals
- Every group a molecule can fall to — what symmetry decides
- Hybrids that were never orthogonal — where the atoms go
- Sixteen is also a count — what the shape is for
- Overlap is not interaction — what the shape is for
- The angle a ring cannot have — where the atoms go
- The atom does not bring its own orbital — orbitals
- The hole that is not repulsion — beyond the octet
- Why a character table stops where it stops — what symmetry decides
- The six motions that are not modes — what a spectrum settles
- A better energy is not a better answer — what is taught wrongly
- The bond that weakens as neighbours multiply — when the molecule does not stop
16 August 2026
15 essays on beyond the octet, where the atoms go, orbitals, what symmetry decides, what a spectrum settles, bonding models, what is taught wrongly and when the molecule does not stop
- Six electrons in a ring that is not all carbon — beyond the octet
- The angle does not fix the hybridisation — where the atoms go
- One coordinate, three point groups — where the atoms go
- One level is not one comparison — orbitals
- What one pair can hold together — beyond the octet
- Six bonds and four orbitals — what symmetry decides
- What the screening model cannot see — orbitals
- A spectrum that changes when only a mass does — what a spectrum settles
- The moment that is the sum of the other two — what a spectrum settles
- Fewer bands than electrons — what a spectrum settles
- Where molecular orbital theory dissociates — bonding models
- The same ring, three charges — bonding models
- A ranking is not a difference — what is taught wrongly
- Two defects, and the level between them — when the molecule does not stop
- Half filled is as bonded as it gets — when the molecule does not stop
15 August 2026
15 essays on what the shape is for, what a spectrum settles, bonding models, what is taught wrongly and when the molecule does not stop
- The splitting is a symmetry statement — what the shape is for
- Two models, one ratio — what the shape is for
- Where a d–d band falls — what the shape is for
- Eighteen is a count — what the shape is for
- Back-bonding is two interactions — what the shape is for
- The trans influence is an overlap argument — what the shape is for
- Copper is never quite octahedral — what the shape is for
- A moment counts electrons, not orbitals — what the shape is for
- The pairing energy decides the moment — what the shape is for
- What couples two spins — what the shape is for
- Why a d–d band is weak — what a spectrum settles
- The smallest many-electron calculation — bonding models
- The spectrochemical series is not electrostatics — what is taught wrongly
- The insulator band theory cannot see — when the molecule does not stop
- VSEPR does not reach a transition metal — what is taught wrongly
14 August 2026
15 essays on when the molecule does not stop and what is taught wrongly
- A solid is a molecule that did not stop — when the molecule does not stop
- The width of a band is a count of neighbours — when the molecule does not stop
- A density of states is not a spectrum — when the molecule does not stop
- A band with no structure in it — when the molecule does not stop
- Where a molecule stops being one — when the molecule does not stop
- What a metal actually is — when the molecule does not stop
- A chain cannot stay even — when the molecule does not stop
- The gap is not the band width — when the molecule does not stop
- Counting electrons in an extended structure — when the molecule does not stop
- A defect is a level in the gap — when the molecule does not stop
- A half-filled band is not always a metal — what is taught wrongly
- The end is the hardest place to bind — when the molecule does not stop
- A band gap is not a bond energy — what is taught wrongly
- What holds a solid together — when the molecule does not stop
- The lattice sum that depends on the order of adding — when the molecule does not stop
11 August 2026
15 essays on what a spectrum settles, beyond the octet, what is taught wrongly, what symmetry decides and bonding models
- Normal modes are not bond stretches — what a spectrum settles
- The isotope shift is arithmetic — what a spectrum settles
- Group frequencies, and where they stop — what a spectrum settles
- How many frequencies, not how many modes — what a spectrum settles
- Two structures, two spectra — what a spectrum settles
- What an absence proves — what a spectrum settles
- A spectrum counts environments, not atoms — what a spectrum settles
- The vibration that lowers the symmetry — beyond the octet
- The force field is not in the spectrum — what is taught wrongly
- The rotational spectrum is a moment of inertia — what a spectrum settles
- A bond length out of a spectrum — what a spectrum settles
- An infinite group, worked in a finite one — what symmetry decides
- The frequency is not the bond strength — what is taught wrongly
- What a photoelectron spectrum measures — what is taught wrongly
- Water's lone pairs are not a pair — bonding models
10 August 2026
12 essays on beyond the octet, what is taught wrongly, where the atoms go, what symmetry decides, orbitals and bonding models
- The band limit — beyond the octet
- A double bond is not two single bonds — what is taught wrongly
- Three-centre bonding, computed — beyond the octet
- What a lone pair is worth — where the atoms go
- Degeneracy is a group theorem — what symmetry decides
- The aufbau order is not a property of the atom — what is taught wrongly
- What an electron actually feels — orbitals
- Which angles are symmetry and which are the model — where the atoms go
- Descent in symmetry — what symmetry decides
- How big is an orbital — orbitals
- The antibonding level goes up more — bonding models
- Hückel with a heteroatom — bonding models
4–8 August 2026
34 essays on what is taught wrongly, beyond the octet, bonding models, what symmetry decides, where the atoms go and orbitals
- Hybridisation does not explain — what is taught wrongly
- Hypervalency without d orbitals — beyond the octet
- Overlap decides — bonding models
- Point groups from coordinates — what symmetry decides
- VSEPR, computed — where the atoms go
- What an orbital is — orbitals
- Delocalisation — beyond the octet
- Exactly zero — bonding models
- Five sites are not alike — where the atoms go
- Orbitals are not where the electron is — what is taught wrongly
- Say what it encloses — orbitals
- Symmetry forbids a dipole — what symmetry decides
- Chirality is a symmetry statement — what symmetry decides
- Conjugation, and its limits — beyond the octet
- Hybrids are a basis — bonding models
- Nodes — orbitals
- The dipole is not a sum of bonds — what is taught wrongly
- Why water is bent — where the atoms go
- The shapes above six coordination — where the atoms go
- Character tables and reduction — what symmetry decides
- Electronegativity is not one quantity — what is taught wrongly
- Molecular orbital and valence bond — bonding models
- Where the electron is — orbitals
- Where two-centre bonding stops — beyond the octet
- Bent's rule, against the substituent series — where the atoms go
- Delocalisation is stabilising, and other things that are false in general — what is taught wrongly
- Hückel theory and what it gets right — bonding models
- Selection rules are one theorem — what symmetry decides
- The radial distribution across the periodic table — orbitals
- Aromaticity as a computed shell closure — bonding models
- Complex harmonics against real ones — orbitals
- Site symmetry, and what it constrains — what symmetry decides
- Bond order from the eigenvectors — bonding models
- The localisation transformation, demonstrated — bonding models