Every essay — page 24
Orbitals Where the atoms go Bonding models What symmetry decides Beyond the octet What a spectrum settles When the molecule does not stop What the shape is for What is taught wrongly Series Named objects Orbitals Refutations Search
Where the atoms go
VSEPR as a repulsion minimisation rather than a table, the angles that fall out of it, and the case where five sites are not all alike.
When the molecule does not stop
A chain of two hundred atoms is a molecule and behaves like a solid. Bands, gaps, metals, defects and surfaces, every one of them out of a finite matrix — and a clear account of what that route cannot reach.
A solid is a molecule that did not stop
Diagonalise a chain of two atoms, then four, then forty. Nothing new happens at any point, and by forty the levels are a band. The passage from molecule to solid is not a change of subject; it is the same matrix at a different size, and every step of it can be watched.
The width of a band is a count of neighbours
The mean of the squared level energies equals the average coordination — exactly, for any structure, with no limit taken and no periodicity assumed. It is the one statement in this field that is arithmetic rather than physics, and the usual textbook formula for band width is a special case of something weaker.
A density of states is not a spectrum
A molecule's spectrum is a list of positions and a solid's is a shape, and the shape is not the density of states. Between the two sits everything the count leaves out — which transitions are allowed, how strongly, and from where to where.
A band with no structure in it
Everything in this field is computed from a finite matrix with no periodicity assumed, which is a real method and a real limitation. It produces a band and cannot produce a band structure — and the difference between those two words is worth an essay, because it is the boundary of what a finite matrix can honestly say.
Where a molecule stops being one
There is no size at which a molecule becomes a solid, and the useful question is a different one — how large must it be before a given property has stopped changing? The answers differ by a factor of several hundred between one property and the next, and every one of them is a measurement.
What a metal actually is
Not shiny, not a good conductor, not an element on the left of the table. A metal is a system with excitations of arbitrarily small energy, and that definition can be checked on a sequence of finite rings without drawing a band diagram or mentioning conduction at all.
A chain cannot stay even
Diagonalise a half-filled chain, alternate its bonds slightly, and diagonalise again. The electrons gain more than the springs lose, and they do so for every spring constant whatever — because the gain is steeper than a parabola near the origin and a logarithm beats any constant.
The gap is not the band width
Two numbers describe a band and they answer different questions. The width is set by how many neighbours an atom has; the gap is set by how unequal they are. A structure can have a wide band and no gap, a narrow band and a large one, and changing one leaves the other alone.
Counting electrons in an extended structure
The octet rule, Hückel's 4n + 2 and the 8 − N rule that predicts the structures of the main-group elements are one rule counted three ways. Each says the same thing — close the shell — and each stops being reliable at exactly the point where closing it becomes impossible.
A defect is a level in the gap
Change one site's energy in a chain of a hundred and sixty and a level leaves the band, carrying a state that lives on a handful of atoms. In one dimension it happens for any change however small — the threshold measured on chains of forty, eighty and a hundred and sixty halves with every doubling, so there is no threshold at all.
The end is the hardest place to bind
A site in the middle of a chain traps a state for any energy difference however small. The site at the end demands a whole β before it traps anything — measured at 1.025, 1.013 and 1.006 on chains of forty, eighty and a hundred and sixty, converging on exactly one. The intuition runs the other way and is wrong.