Every essay — page 20
Orbitals Where the atoms go Bonding models What symmetry decides Beyond the octet What a spectrum settles When the molecule does not stop What the shape is for What is taught wrongly Series Named objects Orbitals Refutations Search
Where the atoms go
VSEPR as a repulsion minimisation rather than a table, the angles that fall out of it, and the case where five sites are not all alike.
A barrier is not what a splitting measures
Ammonia's inversion barrier is quoted everywhere as 2020 wavenumbers. Put that number into the simplest double well its own measured geometry allows and the ground-state splitting comes out at 1.3508 against a measured 0.7935, and the excited one at 68.37 against 35.81. Both are too large because a splitting is an area under a barrier and a height is only one of its two dimensions.
The exponent that runs both ways
How hard does a splitting depend on a barrier? Locally, as the power −3.5628 — and the local slope runs from −2.53 to −6.15 across the same sweep, so there is no power law. What is exact is stranger: rescaling the equation forces the mass exponent to be one below the barrier's and the geometry exponent to be twice the mass's, so the model's three sensitivities are one number and the arithmetic reproduces both identities to six decimals.
It was never the mass
Phosphine does not invert, and the reason given is that phosphorus is heavier than nitrogen. Three things about phosphine differ from ammonia. Substituting each into ammonia's own well one at a time, the reduced mass costs a factor of 1.61, the pyramid height costs 9,600 and the barrier 94,000 — and the mass is the smallest of the three by four orders of magnitude.
The mass nobody chose
Every one-dimensional treatment of ammonia's inversion needs a mass, and the measurement does not supply one. Three constructions are defensible and they give 1.35075, 0.94420 and 0.0000055 wavenumbers. The honest one is not a constant at all, and it moves the answer thirty per cent towards the measurement — which means the usual choice is the wrong one.
The lever that was supposed to be smaller
Sweeping the rotor conventions leaves every verdict unmoved, and suggests that the other quoted input will be a smaller lever. It is a larger one. Sweeping butane's gauche energy over its reported range moves the ceiling by 8.7-fold, flips the six-membered verdict at 3.630 kilojoules a mole — inside the quoted error bar — and takes the five-membered refutation with it at 4.422.
Two sweeps and one lever
The rotamer ceiling depends on the gauche energy and on the temperature only through their ratio, so a sweep of either traces the same curve. Measured in that one variable, the temperature sweep lies entirely inside the gauche sweep — it covered no ground the other does not, and the whole reported spread in one energy is worth a temperature swing from 196 to 353 kelvin.
An ordering worth half a per cent
A mass that varies along a coordinate has no unique quantum kinetic energy, and the choice among the Hermitian orderings in use was the one thing left that could undo a forty-three per cent correction to ammonia's splitting. It cannot. The five orderings anybody uses span 0.47 per cent between them, a ninety-second of the correction, and the family only reaches the measurement at exponents three times larger than any of them.
Deuterium cannot tell the masses apart
A reduced mass built by holding ammonia's bonds rigid predicts a deuterated molecule differently from any constant mass, and ND₃'s splitting is measured. Run as a test, it cannot choose. Every well and every mass needs a barrier for ND₃ several per cent lower than for NH₃, every prediction of the isotope ratio from a well fitted to NH₃ overshoots by eighteen to twenty-nine per cent, and the two masses differ by less than either misses — in opposite directions in the two wells.
The two that are not on the line
Ammonia and its fully deuterated twin are two points, and two points cannot show a curve. Putting the partly deuterated molecules between them needs a term neither symmetric one has — three ligands of unequal mass move their own centre of mass sideways as the apex descends — and it moves the prediction by half a per cent, which is what a whole change of mass construction was worth.
The ordering a manifold picks
A position-dependent mass leaves the kinetic energy with no unique quantum form, and an earlier sweep of the five orderings in use found half a per cent between them. A one-dimensional reduction is a one-dimensional manifold, a manifold has a distinguished Laplacian, and carrying it to the flat measure lands on exactly one of those five — not the one with no extra potential, and not the one anybody reaches for.
The long bond goes to the crowded site
Given one bond longer than the others, the repulsion model puts it axial in a trigonal bipyramid — against the rule it is usually cited for. The reason is a crowding count, and at seven sites the count reverses: the pentagonal bipyramid's crowded site is equatorial, so a long bond goes equatorial and a short one axial. PF₅'s long bonds are axial and IF₇'s are equatorial. And at seven the site a bond avoids is not even a minimum.
When the molecule does not stop
A chain of two hundred atoms is a molecule and behaves like a solid. Bands, gaps, metals, defects and surfaces, every one of them out of a finite matrix — and a clear account of what that route cannot reach.
