Molecular Geometry & Bonding
what the shape decides
The collection

Every essay — page 21

Page 21 of 42, continuing through the fields in the same order.

Orbitals Where the atoms go Bonding models What symmetry decides Beyond the octet What a spectrum settles When the molecule does not stop What the shape is for What is taught wrongly Series Named objects Orbitals Refutations Search

Where the atoms go

VSEPR as a repulsion minimisation rather than a table, the angles that fall out of it, and the case where five sites are not all alike.

Flat rings: the angles, the torsions and what is measured. For each ring from three to eight, held flat: its interior angle, how far that is from tetrahedral, the angle strain that follows, the torsional strain of having every bond eclipsed, and the measured strain energy. The five-ring is the row the essay is about — its angles are almost ideal and it is strained.

The strain that is not in the angles

Cyclopentane's flat bond angles are 108°, a degree and a half from tetrahedral, and its angle strain computed from a standard bending constant is 0.4 kJ mol⁻¹. Its measured strain is twenty-six. The missing sixty kilojoules are torsional — one ethane barrier for every bond in the ring, which no account built on bond angles mentions.

8 figures The same angles, the same torsions, and not the same molecule. twelve closed conformers of a ring of 10 at a bond angle of 111.5 degrees. Every one has exactly the same bond angles, so an account built from angles and torsions places them all on the horizontal axis alone. The vertical axis is the closest approach of two atoms four or more bonds apart, which no term in that account mentions: two of these differ by 0.08 kilojoules in torsional energy and by 0.75 ångström in how close they come.

The atoms that meet across a ring

Twelve closed conformers of a ten-membered ring at one bond angle, so every one has identical angle strain by construction. Two of them differ by 0.026 kilojoules a mole in torsional energy and by 0.80 ångström in how close two atoms on opposite sides of the ring come — 2.331 against 3.131, where two carbons are in contact at about 3.4. An account built from angles and torsions calls those two structures the same.

7 figures What boron trifluoride's bands are strong in, and what they move. Every infrared-active mode of boron trifluoride, with its band strength and the root-mean-square displacement of its atoms in the zero point, each scaled to its own largest. The two do not order the modes the same way — the rank correlation between them is 0.2 — and the strongest band belongs to the mode at 719 cm⁻¹, in which 89.93 per cent of the motion is the lightest atom's. Every mode moves the same weighted amount of mass, exactly, so that is not what separates them either.

The mode that moves least radiates most

Boron trifluoride's strongest infrared band is the one in which the fluorines barely move: ninety per cent of the motion belongs to the boron, which is a fifth of the molecule's mass. The mode that moves the most mass is nine and a half times weaker. Across five molecules the rank correlation between band strength and how far the atoms actually go runs from +1 to −0.66, and every normal mode carries exactly the same weighted motion by construction.

8 figures Three bent bonds, at a hundred and one degrees to each other. A carbon–carbon triple bond in its localised description: three equivalent bent bonds, spaced by 101.54 degrees, each tilted 63.43 degrees off the axis and each carrying 0.17 of an s orbital — an sp⁵ hybrid. Its charge sits 0.32 ångström off the axis, where every canonical orbital's sits on it. The mixing that makes the three equivalent is a rotation in the three-dimensional occupied space, so the density is untouched.

Three bent bonds, and the same hybrid

A triple bond localises into three bent bonds at 101.537 degrees to one another, each an sp⁵ hybrid with exactly one sixth s character. A double bond's two bent components are sp⁵ hybrids at 101.537 degrees. The two are the same hybrid, built out of different frameworks and in different numbers, and the reason is that a third of a half is a half of a third.

7 figures An effect that cannot distort a molecule, deciding how far it distorts. The energy along one distortion coordinate, three times. With only the first-order term the minimum is at 0.6; with only the second-order term there is no minimum away from zero at all, because the gap of 1.5 is above the critical 1 for a closed shell on its own. With both, the molecule distorts to 1.06 — well past the first-order answer — and gains 0.09 more than the two separate stabilisations add up to.

Two distortions in one coordinate

A second-order Jahn–Teller effect that cannot distort a molecule by itself — its gap is half again above the critical value — nearly doubles the distortion when a first-order effect is already acting. The molecule goes to 1.075 instead of 0.600 and gains twice the energy, and it does it while the gap the second-order term divides by is opening rather than closing.

7 figures The 6-ring at 111.5°: the alternating form and what a search finds. The alternating ring — every atom displaced above or below the plane in turn — with its dihedral angles and its two strain terms, beside the lowest-torsion member a search constrained only by bond angles and closure returns. Both satisfy every geometric constraint; only one of them is staggered.

The explanation with the wrong sign

Two methyl groups on one carbon make a ring easier to close, by up to eleven thousand-fold, and the textbook reason is that they compress the ring's internal angle. Computed from a standard bending term, that compression helps a three-ring and a four-ring and hinders every ring from five up — predicting a slowing of 0.754-fold for the five-ring measured to speed up 250-fold. The account with the right sign is about rotations rather than angles, and it has a ceiling of 36.5 that the measurement is already above.

5 figures The ceiling rises and the measurements fall, so they cross. The largest acceleration the rotamer account can produce, against the ring being closed, with the measured gem-dimethyl accelerations on the same axis. Closing a bigger ring means freezing more rotations, so the ceiling rises steeply; the measurements go the other way. The five-membered ring's 250-fold acceleration is above its own ceiling of 36.5 and the six-membered ring's tenfold one is far below its 121 — so the account is refused at one size and sufficient at the next.

A ceiling that rises where the measurements fall

The rotamer account of the gem-dimethyl effect has a largest possible acceleration, which looks like a limitation. It is a prediction: the ceiling is a closed form in the number of rotations a closure freezes, it rises steeply with ring size, and the measurements fall — so the account is refuted for the five-membered ring and more than sufficient for the six.

8 figures Four tables, one answer, and a reason it could not be otherwise. The intensity–motion correlation — infrared intensity against how far the atoms move — computed with charges from four published electronegativity tables. Every molecule gives the same number on all four, to machine precision, because each is made of two elements: its charges are one number times a fixed pattern, a change of table changes only that number, and a rank correlation does not notice a rescaling. The dipole moments beside them do notice, which is the check that the tables are genuinely different.

The table that could not have mattered

Charges taken from one of four electronegativity tables invite a worry, because the tables disagree with each other. They do disagree — hydrogen cyanide's dipole runs over a factor of eleven between them — and for the molecules in question the worry could not have applied, because a molecule of two elements has charges that are one number times a fixed pattern and a rank correlation does not notice a rescaling.

8 figures How far the rotor count would have to be wrong. The ceiling against the number of rotations a closure freezes, with the two measured accelerations drawn across it. The five-membered closure freezes three and its ceiling is 36.46; the ceiling does not reach the measured 250 until 5 rotors, so the count would have to be wrong by 2 on a ring that has three rotations to freeze. The six-membered closure freezes four at a ceiling of 120.88, and stays above its measured 10 down to 2 — so the refusal is airtight and the sufficiency is comfortable.

An estimate that can be wrong by two

The ceiling on the gem-dimethyl effect is exponential in the number of rotations a closure freezes, and that number was taken as n − 2 without counting — which left the refutation at five rings probable rather than airtight. It is airtight. The ceiling does not reach the measured 250 until five rotors, on a ring that has three, and no hindering of the tether can raise it.

6 figures The two rows of a table, and the curve between them. The rotamer ceiling of a closure freezing 4 rotations, against how hard each of a stated number of them is to turn. The top curve is the free-rotor row and the right-hand end of the bottom curve is the absent-rotor row; everything else is what a real hindered tether does. The measured acceleration of 10-fold is drawn across it. It falls below that line when 3 of the 4 are hindered by 4.09 kJ/mol, or when 4 of the 4 are hindered by 2.70 kJ/mol.

The curve between two rows

A rotation a ring closure has to freeze was treated as free or as absent, and the two answers sat in adjacent rows of a table. A real hindered rotor is neither. The factor one rotor contributes runs from 3.316 to one along a curve nobody had drawn, and where it matters is between one and eight kilojoules a mole — which is a torsional barrier rather than a conformational preference.

6 figures Twelve hydrogen bonds, four tables. The bond dipole of hydrogen against each partner, in debye, on each of the four tables after all four are anchored to the same hydrogen–fluorine separation. Positive is hydrogen at the positive end. A bond whose marks straddle the axis is one the tables disagree about the direction of, and there are 3 of them.

Four tables and one molecule to disagree about

A molecule of two elements is provably safe from the choice of electronegativity table, and a series down a group should land where the tables do disagree. It does. All four agree that hydrogen iodide is the exception — and they disagree about what its dipole is by 1.245 debye, which is two and a half times the 0.448 that was measured.

6 figures The two sides of a verdict, with error bars. The computed ceiling for the six-membered closure — 10.9945 — with the band a gauche energy of 3.8 ± 0.4 kJ/mol puts on it, against the measured tenfold rate ratio with an assumed 20 per cent uncertainty. The two bands overlap over most of their length, and the nine per cent margin the verdict was decided by sits inside both of them.

A verdict inside its own error bar

The tightest comparison in the rotamer argument is a computed 10.99 against a measured 10 — a nine per cent margin, offered as a verdict. The computed side is built on one quoted energy known to ±0.4 kJ/mol, and that alone puts a band of twenty-three per cent on it. The verdict turns on four tenths of one standard deviation of a number nobody had put an error bar on.

6 figures