Molecular Geometry & Bonding
what the shape decides
The collection

Every essay — page 34

Page 34 of 36, continuing through the fields in the same order.

Orbitals Where the atoms go Bonding models What symmetry decides Beyond the octet What a spectrum settles When the molecule does not stop What the shape is for What is taught wrongly Series Named objects Orbitals Refutations Search

What is taught wrongly

The explanations that are confident, memorable and false — stated fairly and then tested against a calculation rather than an opinion.

Bonds the scales disagree about. For each bond, which atom each scale calls the more electronegative. Every row is a bond whose polarity would be drawn in opposite directions depending on which of these four tables in common use was consulted: Pauling, Mulliken, Allred–Rochow, Allen.

A ranking is not a difference

Four electronegativity scales agree about order to a Spearman coefficient of 0.99 and disagree about size by a factor of sixty-two. Put each on its own range and the O–H bond is 39 per cent of the way across on three scales and 4.5 on the fourth.

7 figures The energy is the last thing a wrong wavefunction gets wrong. Two errors against the error in the wavefunction, on log axes, for a chain of 2 at U = 4t. The energy's line has slope 2.00 and the double occupancy's has slope 1.01: the first is second order in the error and the second is first order. So the two lines diverge as the wavefunction improves, and the energy stops being evidence about anything else long before it stops improving.

A better energy is not a better answer

The variational principle makes the energy a one-way test: lower is closer. It also makes the energy the least sensitive thing a wavefunction gets wrong — second order in the error where every other property is first — so the two diverge without limit as a calculation improves.

5 figures Three answers to one question. The energy to remove an electron from a half-filled four-site system, computed three ways against the repulsion: exactly, by solving a self-consistent field twice — once for the molecule and once for the ion — and by reading the highest occupied orbital energy straight off the molecule, which is Koopmans' theorem. All three agree exactly at zero repulsion. The theorem always sits above the two-calculation answer, because letting the ion relax can only lower it; the exact answer sits above both, because the molecule is more correlated than its ion. The two errors have opposite signs and do not cancel: the residue grows to 6.03.

Koopmans' theorem is exact for nothing

Reading an ionisation energy off an orbital energy neglects two things that pull in opposite directions, and the cancellation between them is quoted as the reason it works. Compute all three energies in a model where the exact answer is available and the cancellation is real, partial, and gone by the time the repulsion is twice the hopping.

5 figures Five sixths of the bonds, nine tenths of the binding. What a site in the outer layer of an open block keeps, measured three ways: the fraction of its bonds, the fraction the second-moment rule predicts of its binding, and the fraction the calculation gives. The last two agree and the first does not.

A surface is not a count of broken bonds

Cut a crystal and every atom in the new face has lost one of its six neighbours. The standard estimate follows immediately: a surface costs one sixth of the cohesive energy per atom exposed. Computed, it costs a little over half that — the atom keeps 91.2 per cent of its binding while keeping only 83.3 per cent of its bonds, because the bonds that survive get stronger when their competitors are removed.

5 figures Where two bands lie, as their centres are pulled apart. The σ band and the π band of a two-orbital chain, drawn as the intervals they occupy, against the difference in site energy between the two orbitals. Below a difference of 3 the two intervals overlap and the filled-band count stops deciding anything.

A full band is not an insulator

Two electrons per atom, two orbitals per atom, and the lower set exactly full: the count says insulator, and magnesium is a metal. The count is not wrong about the count. What it assumes is that the two sets of levels occupy separate ranges of energy, and whether they do is a comparison of four numbers that has nothing to do with how many electrons there are.

8 figures H³⁵Cl: the well, its states and their averages. The Morse potential built from H³⁵Cl's measured vibrational constants, with the lowest four states drawn at their computed energies and the average separation of each marked. Every average lies to the right of the minimum, because the well is not symmetric — and they move outward as the state rises.

The bond length that depends on the isotope

Hydrogen chloride and deuterium chloride have the same potential energy curve, and their measured equilibrium lengths agree to three hundredths of a milliångström. Their average bond lengths differ by 4.34 mÅ — a hundred times more — because a lighter atom explores more of a well that is not symmetric.

8 figures How many sites a state occupies, and whether that depends on the ring. The participation ratio of the states at the middle of the band — the number of sites a state occupies — against the width of the disorder, for rings of 50, 100, 200 sites. With no disorder the three curves are three different numbers, each two thirds of its own ring. At the right they have converged: 7.47 sites on a ring of 50 and 9.82 on a ring 4 times larger.

The third way to be an insulator

A ring of two hundred sites with a half-filled band has its levels crowding together as 1/n, which is the usual electronic-structure criterion for a metal, and it goes on holding at every disorder tested. Meanwhile the states at the middle of the band go from occupying 127 sites to occupying 10 — and at that disorder the number stops depending on how large the ring is at all.

7 figures Nearly all of the error cancels, and the answer gets worse. For each repulsion: the error a spin-paired mean field makes in the total energy of one four-site system and of two two-site ones with the same number of electrons, and the error left in the difference between them. The cancellation improves from 83 to 97 per cent along the axis. The residue as a share of the quantity being computed goes the other way, from 1 to 423 per cent, because the reaction energy shrinks faster than what survives.

Two wrong numbers and a right difference

A mean field gets the total energy of a four-site system wrong by 12.11 and of two two-site systems wrong by 12.49, and 96.9 per cent of that error cancels out of the difference between them. The residue is 0.38 — and the reaction energy it is a residue of is 0.09, so the cancellation improves and the answer gets worse at the same time. Change the pair being compared to a singlet and a triplet and nothing cancels at all: the sign goes.

5 figures The bonding follows the overlap over, and turns where it turns. The stabilisation of three pairs of orbitals against how far apart they are, each scaled to its own largest, with the coupling taken from the computed overlap. Two orbitals with no radial node are stabilised less at every separation further out; the two with one turn over — and the maximum of the bonding is at exactly the separation of maximum overlap, to five decimal places, because a coupling proportional to the overlap makes the stabilisation a strictly increasing function of it.

The same overlap, a different bond

A 1s and a 2s change their overlap by two thirds between two and seven bohr, and change what they are bonded by by 0.154 per cent. The overlap turns over and the bonding turns over with it, at exactly the same separation to five decimal places — the arithmetic refused the expectation that the secular denominators would move it — and what separates one pair from another is not where the maximum is but how little of it there is.

8 figures How many times more a metal carries, and when. The ratio of the carriers in a uniform ring to those in an alternating one of the same size, at four sizes and six temperatures. Down the left-hand column the two are indistinguishable, because a ring of 42 at kT = 0.002 has a level spacing larger than the temperature and is no more a metal than the gapped one is. Along the bottom row they are indistinguishable again, because the temperature is larger than the gap. The word only means anything in the middle.

The metal a thermometer cannot find

A metal is a system with excitations of arbitrarily small energy, which is a claim about a sequence of finite systems rather than about any one of them. Put a temperature on it and the claim needs a second limit, and the two do not commute: a uniform ring of forty-two at kT = 0.002 carries exactly as much as an alternating one, and at kT = 0.1 a ring of three hundred and twenty-two carries only four times as much.

5 figures A correction that stops belonging to the system it is added to. The exact ground state of a four-site Hubbard ring, the unrestricted mean field's, and the composite: the mean field plus the correlation correction computed on the symmetric molecule. At ε = 0 the two systems are the same one and the composite is exact. As the sites are made unlike, the transferred correction stops being the right one — the exact correlation energy shrinks towards nothing while the transferred number does not — and the last rows are the recipe adding a correction almost as large as the error it is meant to remove.

The correction that was computed somewhere else

Every composite method rests on one assumption: that an expensive correction computed on a small case can be added to a cheap calculation on a large one. Tested on four sites where both answers are exact, it removes 99.74 per cent of the cheap method's error near the reference and −1450 per cent of it further away — at which point the recipe is fifteen times as wrong as the calculation it was improving.

5 figures Four unweighted rules against the answer the hardnesses give. Twelve molecules, each drawn with the exact equalised electronegativity as a filled mark and the four unweighted means of the free atoms' values as open ones. The geometric mean — Sanderson's rule — is the closest on average, at 0.0706 eV against the arithmetic mean's 0.1666, and it is the closest on only 4 of the twelve. Every rule below the arithmetic mean is constrained to sit below it, and 2 of the exact answers do not.

A mean that is low rather than right

Sanderson's rule takes the geometric mean of the atoms' electronegativities, and it works better than the plain average. Computed against the exact equalised answer for twelve molecules it is better by erring downwards — and two of the twelve have exact answers above the plain average, where no geometric mean can go at any parameter.

8 figures