Molecular Geometry & Bonding
what the shape decides
Concept

Stark effect — where it appears

The shift and splitting of atomic levels by an electric field, which mixes states differing by one unit of orbital momentum. It is what makes an otherwise good quantum number stop being one, and its size is set by a dipole matrix element rather than by the level spacing.

Named by 7 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Tilting the field raises the count, and then lowers it again. How many distinct fields the shell has an event at, against the angle between the field and the z axis. Along either axis there are 3; at a general tilt every one of the 6 coupled pairs has its own field and there are 6. In between the count comes back down at four angles where two events coincide, and at forty-five degrees two separate coincidences happen at once.

Four angles the shell chooses

A field along one axis gives a shell of nine functions three fields with an event, and tilting the field should separate the coincident ones and raise the count towards the number of coupled pairs. It does — from three to six. But not monotonically: at four angles two events collide again, and every one of those angles is the arctangent of a ratio of the shell's own angular integrals.

symmetry · Representation One crossing, and the six fields that are not one. Open marks: every two-state crossover field, at each tilt. Filled line: the field at which the exact spectrum's one avoided crossing actually sits. The estimates scatter over a factor of four to twenty; the real crossing moves by a factor of 1.34 across the whole ninety degrees, and passes the four coincidence angles — the dashed verticals — without any feature at all.

None of the six was a crossing

Counting events in a tilted field finds the count rising from three to six, dropping again at four angles that are exact arctangents of the shell's own integrals. Every one of those statements is true of the two-state estimates. Diagonalising the five-level problem exactly finds one avoided crossing at every tilt, in a field that moves by a third across ninety degrees, and no feature whatever at any of the four angles.

symmetry · Representation A thirty-four per cent variation that is entirely the truncation. The field at which the one avoided crossing sits, against the tilt, computed in the five functions a field in the xz plane couples and in the whole nine-function shell. The truncated answer runs from 1.6435e-5 to 2.2014e-5 — a factor of 1.34. The whole shell's is 2.0876e-5 at every direction, and equals the truncated answer at zero tilt, where the truncation is exact because the field is along z and the excluded functions genuinely do not couple.

The variation was the basis

Solved in the five functions a field in one plane couples, the tilted Stark problem has one avoided crossing at every tilt and a crossing field that moves by a third across ninety degrees. Solved in the whole nine-function shell the field does not move at all — the same number at every direction, to eleven decimal places — and the thirty-four per cent was the truncation.

symmetry · Representation One and eight, over two decades of defect. The number of avoided crossings the whole shell has, against the number of two-state crossover fields its coupled pairs supply, as the quantum defect is swept towards zero. The question is whether the estimated count falls to meet the exact one as the l degeneracy closes. It does not move: one against eight at every defect tried, from 0.02 down to 0.0002, with the estimates spanning a factor of 7.08 throughout.

Consistently wrong is not a limit

Does the two-state picture of a tilted Stark shell become right as the quantum defect closes the l degeneracy? Swept over two decades it does not move: one avoided crossing against eight estimates at every defect. The reason is that every dimensionless quantity settles — the crossing sits at 0.04000 of the zero-field gap and the nearest estimate at 0.9067 of the crossing, and neither is heading anywhere.

symmetry · Representation Two levels of different symmetry, closest at 0.0399865. The lowest m = 0 level and the lowest |m| = 1 level of the zero-defect shell, in units of the s–p gap, against the field in the same units. Both fall. Their separation is smallest at 0.039986525, where it is 0.97648 of the zero-field gap, and they never meet. The field along z commutes with the angular momentum about z, the two levels belong to different values of it, and no element of the field connects them.

The crossing nothing couples

A tilted Stark shell's one avoided crossing settled at 0.04000 of the zero-field gap, and the natural guess was a ratio of angular integrals. With the quantum defect taken out the limit is 0.0399865, not four hundredths — and the two levels at that minimum belong to different symmetries about the field, which no element of the field connects. It was never an avoided crossing. The one minimum between levels that do interact sits at half the field, behind a level of the other kind.

symmetry · Representation One spectrum along three directions, and three different sets of estimates. The two-state estimate gap ÷ 2d for every pair of the shell's functions the field couples, with the field along z, along x and at the tilt the defect sweep used. Along z there are three distinct estimates, along x three different ones and at the tilt eight, none equal to any of the axial three. The exact spectrum is identical along all three directions, and its two minima are drawn as vertical lines: the one between coupled levels at 0.0196 and the tangency of uncoupled levels at 0.0400. An estimate is a property of the axes the functions were written along, and a feature is not.

Two levels cannot make a minimum

The one minimum between coupled levels in a Stark shell sits at 0.0196 of the s–p gap, and the nearest two-state estimate at 0.0192 — two per cent away, which reads as the estimates having been aimed at the right feature all along. They were not. Two coupled levels only ever separate, so no estimate can be where its own pair is closest. The minimum belongs to a third level, exists only while the d level sits within a quarter of the s–p gap, and meets the estimate by crossing it.

symmetry · Representation Only lithium's d level sits close enough to p. Each alkali's offset — how far its d level sits above p, in units of its s–p gap — at every shell from its valence shell to the thirtieth, computed from measured quantum defects, against the threshold below which a shell's s and p levels have a coupled minimum in a field. The screening model's offset of one fifth is drawn for comparison. Lithium sits below the threshold at every shell. Sodium, potassium, rubidium and caesium sit above it everywhere, by factors of 2.6 to 7.

Four alkalis the model cannot hold

A shell's s and p levels have a coupled minimum in an electric field when its d level sits within a threshold fraction of the s–p gap above p, and a screening model put every shell's d level at one fifth — inside the threshold from the third shell on, with more room the larger the defect. Computed from measured quantum defects, lithium keeps the minimum at every shell. Sodium, potassium, rubidium and caesium lose it at every shell, and the screening model has no member that resembles any of them.

symmetry · Representation

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

DegeneracyMatrix elementModel limitAvoided crossingAngular momentumQuantum defectSymmetry breakingPerturbation theoryBasisConvergencePenetrationScreening

All concepts