Matrix element — where it appears
Named by 17 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
A density of states is not a spectrum
A molecule's spectrum is a list of positions and a solid's is a shape, and the shape is not the density of states. Between the two sits everything the count leaves out — which transitions are allowed, how strongly, and from where to where.
The g-value is the orbital coming back
A ligand field quenches the orbital angular momentum of a d electron, and spin-orbit coupling gives some of it back — upward for a shell more than half full and downward for one less than half full. Which way a resonance line moves counts the electrons, and the size of the move comes from two matrix elements and one optical splitting.
The symmetry that is not a rotation
Hydrogen's n = 2 shell holds four states at one energy and its rotation group accounts for at most three. The operator that accounts for the fourth is built here out of computed integrals: three matrices whose commutators close into the rotations, whose product with the angular momentum vanishes, and whose Casimir comes out at exactly n² − 1.
More bands than there are orbitals
A photoelectron spectrum is read as a list of orbital energies, one band per occupied orbital. Computed exactly for a six-orbital ring, it has three bands with no repulsion and a hundred with eight — and by then fifty-three per cent of the intensity is in lines that no orbital corresponds to. The total intensity is three at every repulsion, exactly, because that is a sum rule and not a fit.
A hundred lines and no way to sort them
A spectrum with a hundred lines has six fundamentals in it somewhere. Sorting by height works until the tallest satellite is as tall as the shortest band, and sorting by position works until satellites start arriving between the bands — and on a ring of six both stop working at the same repulsion.
The current does not divide
A fused ring system's response was computed from the areas of its rings, and the obvious next question was whether the current divides between them the way it divides between two resistors. Giving each ring its own flux and taking the second derivatives says no: the response is a matrix, its off-diagonal entries are nearly half its diagonal ones, and anthracene's middle ring carries 1.18 times what its outer rings do.
How nearly a broken symmetry survives
The hydrogen shell's extra symmetry is what makes its Stark effect linear, and a real atom does not have it. Screening splits the shell, and the field needed to overcome the splitting and restore the linear behaviour is a curve — from forty thousand volts a centimetre at a quantum defect of 0.0004 to thirty million at a defect of 0.21.
A bond order between atoms that do not interact
A diatomic held where its overlap changes sign has no interaction between its two orbitals at all — which is what the sign change of its overlap means. Put a third orbital beside it and the pair is still split, one line sits exactly at the free-atom energy at every third-orbital energy, and the bond order between the two runs to −0.9999. Three measures of the same bond disagree completely.
Four angles the shell chooses
A field along one axis gives a shell of nine functions three fields with an event, and tilting the field should separate the coincident ones and raise the count towards the number of coupled pairs. It does — from three to six. But not monotonically: at four angles two events collide again, and every one of those angles is the arctangent of a ratio of the shell's own angular integrals.
None of the six was a crossing
Counting events in a tilted field finds the count rising from three to six, dropping again at four angles that are exact arctangents of the shell's own integrals. Every one of those statements is true of the two-state estimates. Diagonalising the five-level problem exactly finds one avoided crossing at every tilt, in a field that moves by a third across ninety degrees, and no feature whatever at any of the four angles.
The variation was the basis
Solved in the five functions a field in one plane couples, the tilted Stark problem has one avoided crossing at every tilt and a crossing field that moves by a third across ninety degrees. Solved in the whole nine-function shell the field does not move at all — the same number at every direction, to eleven decimal places — and the thirty-four per cent was the truncation.
Consistently wrong is not a limit
Does the two-state picture of a tilted Stark shell become right as the quantum defect closes the l degeneracy? Swept over two decades it does not move: one avoided crossing against eight estimates at every defect. The reason is that every dimensionless quantity settles — the crossing sits at 0.04000 of the zero-field gap and the nearest estimate at 0.9067 of the crossing, and neither is heading anywhere.
The crossing nothing couples
A tilted Stark shell's one avoided crossing settled at 0.04000 of the zero-field gap, and the natural guess was a ratio of angular integrals. With the quantum defect taken out the limit is 0.0399865, not four hundredths — and the two levels at that minimum belong to different symmetries about the field, which no element of the field connects. It was never an avoided crossing. The one minimum between levels that do interact sits at half the field, behind a level of the other kind.
Two levels cannot make a minimum
The one minimum between coupled levels in a Stark shell sits at 0.0196 of the s–p gap, and the nearest two-state estimate at 0.0192 — two per cent away, which reads as the estimates having been aimed at the right feature all along. They were not. Two coupled levels only ever separate, so no estimate can be where its own pair is closest. The minimum belongs to a third level, exists only while the d level sits within a quarter of the s–p gap, and meets the estimate by crossing it.
The threshold belongs to the atom
Whether an alkali shell's s and p levels have a coupled minimum in a field was decided by comparing where its d level sits with a threshold built from hydrogen's dipole elements. Computed from each atom's own quantum defects instead — with integrals that reproduce three measured resonance lines to one per cent — the threshold is not a property of the shell at all. Lithium's rises by half, sodium's third shell regains the minimum the hydrogenic comparison denied it, and the heavier alkalis keep their verdict for a reason nobody had given: their p–d integral cancels, and in potassium it changes sign between two shells.
The shell was the wrong unit
Whether an alkali's s and p levels approach each other in a weak field was decided from three levels of one shell. The criterion that holds every level is a difference of two polarisabilities, and polarisabilities are measured. Summed over every s, p and d level with integrals that reproduce five measured ground states to two per cent, the difference keeps sodium's verdict at thirty times the margin and reverses potassium's, rubidium's and caesium's at every shell — because the d level beside p belongs to the shell below.
Potassium's turn was a fine-structure question
Summed over every level, potassium's p level stops being more polarisable than its s level somewhere past the thirtieth shell, and a thousandth in any quantum defect moved the turn by shells. With the Ritz series measured on ultracold ³⁹K in 2019 the inputs are fixed to a millionth, and the turn lands at the thirty-fourth shell, not the thirty-seventh. But the two fine-structure components of the p series differ by three thousandths: with either one in place of their average the turn is at the twenty-third or the forty-fifth. A sign decided by the spinless sum is decided by an interval a hundred and fiftieth of the s–p gap.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Model limitDegeneracyStark effectAngular momentumQuantum defectAvoided crossingClosed formPerturbation theorySymmetry breakingMolecular orbitalPhotoelectron spectroscopyBasis