Polarisability — where it appears
Named by 12 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
What holds a solid together
Four kinds of interaction between two units of matter, each computed from a stated model and put on one logarithmic scale. The ordering is not the one usually taught — an ion pair at contact beats a shared pair, which is a fact about the comparison rather than about the numbers.
A control that outranked the mechanism
Ruling polarisation out left one candidate, and the closed-shell overlap ranks at 0.857 against the additivity shortfall — which looked like the answer until the control was read. The cation's formal charge, which cannot be a mechanism, ranks at 0.9524. Eight pairs split four and four by charge cannot separate anything, and within a charge group two candidates both rank perfectly.
One number was one direction
The departure of a depolarisation ratio from three quarters goes as the square of a distortion, and the exponent was first measured along one bond stretch. Computed along every non-symmetric coordinate the exponent is always two and the coefficient is not: it spans a factor of thirty inside methane. And the ratio is not preferentially sensitive to the coordinates a molecule is soft along — in two molecules of three the stiffest coordinate is the most sensitive.
The distortion the ratio cannot see
A depolarisation ratio can be made into a structural probe: break a molecule's symmetry and a band fixed at three quarters comes off it by an amount that depends on the distortion. The question is whether two distortions the ratio can see separately might cancel into one it cannot. They do — and the cancellation is exact, at any size, because the blind direction is the one that keeps the symmetry.
One number was a direction too
The depolarisation probe is exactly blind to the totally symmetric direction, which suggests it reads the distortion's component outside that species. What is left is a plane, and over a circle in it the reading varies by a factor of 1.98 — smallest for one bond against another, largest for two bonds against one, repeating every sixty degrees.
The sum was flat all along
The depolarisation reading varies by a factor of two round a circle in the non-symmetric plane, and the anisotropy may belong to taking a maximum over four bands rather than to the physics. Summing the four instead gives a reading constant to four parts in ten thousand, against a maximum that varies by ninety-eight per cent.
Two numbers caught what one could not
No single threshold on the electronegativity difference separates the bond pairs whose polarity the four tables dispute from those they agree on — the best misses six of a hundred and fifty-three. Adding how much the tables disagree halves that to three and catches every disputed pair. And three is what four coin-flips produce: the rule flags nineteen pairs, an eighth of which should look agreed for no reason at all, which is 2.375 against the three observed.
The shape was the group and the size was not
A depolarisation probe swept round a circle of distortions gives a reading with a sixty-degree period and a largest-over-smallest of about two, and the residual left in the sum over bands scaled as the amplitude to the 1.248. Run the identical probe on ammonia — the same three stretches, the same three-fold axis, the mirror plane gone — and the period and the ratio come back within three per cent, while the departure is a hundred and sixty-nine times larger, the residual twenty-three times, and the exponent is 0.816. The angular shape is the group's. Nothing else is, and the pyramid's residual is not even a power law.
What a linewidth leaves of the probe
The depolarisation probe had two limits. Read on each band it varies by a factor of two round a circle of distortions, and read on each pair blended it varies by two thirds of a per cent. A spectrum sits between them, and where it sits can now be computed. For boron trifluoride distorted by two hundredths of an ångström the direction survives until the line width approaches the bending pair's 2.8 cm⁻¹ splitting, not the stretching pair's 0.53. A pair drawn as one peak is still not read as its blend: that takes widths several times the splitting. And the resolution was always the easy half, because the splitting is first order in the distortion and the signal second.
The shell was the wrong unit
Whether an alkali's s and p levels approach each other in a weak field was decided from three levels of one shell. The criterion that holds every level is a difference of two polarisabilities, and polarisabilities are measured. Summed over every s, p and d level with integrals that reproduce five measured ground states to two per cent, the difference keeps sodium's verdict at thirty times the margin and reverses potassium's, rubidium's and caesium's at every shell — because the d level beside p belongs to the shell below.
The pyramid trades its pairs
Ammonia's depolarisation probe was expected to survive a wider line than boron trifluoride's, because both of its degenerate pairs are split more by the same distortion. It survives a narrower one. On the plane the bending pair carries the reading; on the pyramid the stretching pair does, thirty times over, and its splitting is the smaller of ammonia's two — so the direction halves at 2.6 cm⁻¹ instead of 3.5. What the pyramid keeps is the size. The contrast a measurement has to resolve is 178 times the plane's, and at a ratio precision of one per cent ammonia's direction becomes readable from 0.046 Å of distortion, where boron trifluoride's is unreadable at 0.16.
Potassium's turn was a fine-structure question
Summed over every level, potassium's p level stops being more polarisable than its s level somewhere past the thirtieth shell, and a thousandth in any quantum defect moved the turn by shells. With the Ritz series measured on ultracold ³⁹K in 2019 the inputs are fixed to a millionth, and the turn lands at the thirty-fourth shell, not the thirty-seventh. But the two fine-structure components of the p series differ by three thousandths: with either one in place of their average the turn is at the twenty-third or the forty-fifth. A sign decided by the spinless sum is decided by an interval a hundred and fiftieth of the s–p gap.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Model limitDepolarisation ratioDegeneracySymmetry breakingRaman spectroscopyIrreducible representationsNormal modeApproximationConventionMatrix elementPerturbation theoryQuantum defect