Molecular Geometry & Bonding
what the shape decides
Concept

Polarisability — where it appears

How much an electron distribution is distorted by an electric field, as a dipole per unit field. For a hydrogenic one-electron atom it is exactly 9/2Z⁴, so it falls very steeply with nuclear charge and a compact ion is far stiffer than a diffuse one.

Named by 7 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

What holds matter together, per pair. Four kinds of interaction between two units of matter, each computed from the model named beside it, on a logarithmic energy scale. The range from top to bottom is a factor of several hundred, which is the number behind why a molecular solid melts hundreds of degrees below a covalent one.

What holds a solid together

Four kinds of interaction between two units of matter, each computed from a stated model and put on one logarithmic scale. The ordering is not the one usually taught — an ion pair at contact beats a shared pair, which is a fact about the comparison rather than about the numbers.

solids · Cohesion A control that ranked better than the mechanism. Rank correlations against the additivity shortfall, over eight ion pairs. The overlap of the two closed shells ranks at 0.8571 — but the cation's formal charge, which cannot be a mechanism, ranks at 0.9524, so the set is confounded: its eight pairs split four and four by charge and everything else rises with it. Held fixed within a charge group the overlap still ranks at 0.80 — and so does the softness, at -1.00. Four pairs cannot separate two candidates.

A control that outranked the mechanism

Ruling polarisation out left one candidate, and the closed-shell overlap ranks at 0.857 against the additivity shortfall — which looked like the answer until the control was read. The cation's formal charge, which cannot be a mechanism, ranks at 0.9524. Eight pairs split four and four by charge cannot separate anything, and within a charge group two candidates both rank perfectly.

orbitals · Contour How fast the three quarters goes, along each coordinate. The coefficient of the square, for every non-symmetric mode of three molecules, against the mode's own frequency. A single measurement takes one of these — along a bond stretch — and reports the exponent rather than the size. The sizes span a factor of thirty within methane alone, and the coordinates a molecule is softest along are not systematically the most sensitive: ammonia's stiff pair is five times more sensitive than its soft one.

One number was one direction

The departure of a depolarisation ratio from three quarters goes as the square of a distortion, and the exponent was first measured along one bond stretch. Computed along every non-symmetric coordinate the exponent is always two and the coefficient is not: it spans a factor of thirty inside methane. And the ratio is not preferentially sensitive to the coordinates a molecule is soft along — in two molecules of three the stiffest coordinate is the most sensitive.

spectra · Spectrum Six distortions, and the one the ratio cannot see at all. How far a depolarised band of boron trifluoride comes off three quarters when the bonds are stretched in six different combinations, all at the same size. Five move it. The one that stretches every bond by the same amount moves it by nothing whatever — not a small amount, exactly none — because that distortion keeps every symmetry operation the molecule had, and the band sits at three quarters by its species.

The distortion the ratio cannot see

A depolarisation ratio can be made into a structural probe: break a molecule's symmetry and a band fixed at three quarters comes off it by an amount that depends on the distortion. The question is whether two distortions the ratio can see separately might cancel into one it cannot. They do — and the cancellation is exact, at any size, because the blind direction is the one that keeps the symmetry.

spectra · Spectrum The reading is a function of direction, with a sixty-degree period. The departure of a depolarised band from three quarters, for distortions of equal magnitude pointing all the way round the plane of stretches that sum to zero. It is not one number: it runs from 8.177e-6 to 1.617e-5, a factor of 1.978. The minima are at one bond against another and the maxima at two bonds against one, and the pattern repeats every sixty degrees.

One number was a direction too

The depolarisation probe is exactly blind to the totally symmetric direction, which suggests it reads the distortion's component outside that species. What is left is a plane, and over a circle in it the reading varies by a factor of 1.98 — smallest for one bond against another, largest for two bonds against one, repeating every sixty degrees.

spectra · Spectrum The sum is flat and the maximum is not. Both readings round the circle, each divided by its own average so the two can be drawn together. The maximum varies by 98 per cent; the sum over all four depolarised bands varies by 0.038. A sum cannot be changed by reordering, so if each band's departure is an isotropic quadratic form the sum must be constant — and to four parts in ten thousand it is.

The sum was flat all along

The depolarisation reading varies by a factor of two round a circle in the non-symmetric plane, and the anisotropy may belong to taking a maximum over four bands rather than to the physics. Summing the four instead gives a reading constant to four parts in ten thousand, against a maximum that varies by ninety-eight per cent.

spectra · Spectrum Two quantities, and the best straight line between the two kinds of pair. Every pair the four electronegativity tables all cover, by how much the two elements differ and by how much the tables disagree about them. Filled points are pairs whose sign the tables dispute. The line is the boundary that misclassifies fewest — 3 of 153, against 6 for the best rule using the difference alone. It slopes upward, which is the mechanism: more dispute buys a larger difference and still leaves the sign in doubt.

Two numbers caught what one could not

No single threshold on the electronegativity difference separates the bond pairs whose polarity the four tables dispute from those they agree on — the best misses six of a hundred and fifty-three. Adding how much the tables disagree halves that to three and catches every disputed pair. And three is what four coin-flips produce: the rule flags nineteen pairs, an eighth of which should look agreed for no reason at all, which is 2.375 against the three observed.

shape · Dipole

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Model limitDepolarisation ratioSymmetry breakingApproximationDegeneracyIrreducible representationsNormal modeRaman spectroscopyConventionSelection rulesClosed-shell configurationsCohesion

All concepts