Molecular Geometry & Bonding
what the shape decides
Concept

Avoided crossing — where it appears

A field or parameter at which two levels of a system approach, repel and reopen without ever meeting. Eigenvalues of a real symmetric matrix under one parameter do not cross unless a symmetry forces it, so what looks like a crossing is a minimum in a gap — and how deep that minimum goes is what says whether the two states genuinely exchange character.

Named by 5 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

One crossing, and the six fields that are not one. Open marks: every two-state crossover field, at each tilt. Filled line: the field at which the exact spectrum's one avoided crossing actually sits. The estimates scatter over a factor of four to twenty; the real crossing moves by a factor of 1.34 across the whole ninety degrees, and passes the four coincidence angles — the dashed verticals — without any feature at all.

None of the six was a crossing

Counting events in a tilted field finds the count rising from three to six, dropping again at four angles that are exact arctangents of the shell's own integrals. Every one of those statements is true of the two-state estimates. Diagonalising the five-level problem exactly finds one avoided crossing at every tilt, in a field that moves by a third across ninety degrees, and no feature whatever at any of the four angles.

symmetry · Representation A thirty-four per cent variation that is entirely the truncation. The field at which the one avoided crossing sits, against the tilt, computed in the five functions a field in the xz plane couples and in the whole nine-function shell. The truncated answer runs from 1.6435e-5 to 2.2014e-5 — a factor of 1.34. The whole shell's is 2.0876e-5 at every direction, and equals the truncated answer at zero tilt, where the truncation is exact because the field is along z and the excluded functions genuinely do not couple.

The variation was the basis

Solved in the five functions a field in one plane couples, the tilted Stark problem has one avoided crossing at every tilt and a crossing field that moves by a third across ninety degrees. Solved in the whole nine-function shell the field does not move at all — the same number at every direction, to eleven decimal places — and the thirty-four per cent was the truncation.

symmetry · Representation One and eight, over two decades of defect. The number of avoided crossings the whole shell has, against the number of two-state crossover fields its coupled pairs supply, as the quantum defect is swept towards zero. The question is whether the estimated count falls to meet the exact one as the l degeneracy closes. It does not move: one against eight at every defect tried, from 0.02 down to 0.0002, with the estimates spanning a factor of 7.08 throughout.

Consistently wrong is not a limit

Does the two-state picture of a tilted Stark shell become right as the quantum defect closes the l degeneracy? Swept over two decades it does not move: one avoided crossing against eight estimates at every defect. The reason is that every dimensionless quantity settles — the crossing sits at 0.04000 of the zero-field gap and the nearest estimate at 0.9067 of the crossing, and neither is heading anywhere.

symmetry · Representation Two levels of different symmetry, closest at 0.0399865. The lowest m = 0 level and the lowest |m| = 1 level of the zero-defect shell, in units of the s–p gap, against the field in the same units. Both fall. Their separation is smallest at 0.039986525, where it is 0.97648 of the zero-field gap, and they never meet. The field along z commutes with the angular momentum about z, the two levels belong to different values of it, and no element of the field connects them.

The crossing nothing couples

A tilted Stark shell's one avoided crossing settled at 0.04000 of the zero-field gap, and the natural guess was a ratio of angular integrals. With the quantum defect taken out the limit is 0.0399865, not four hundredths — and the two levels at that minimum belong to different symmetries about the field, which no element of the field connects. It was never an avoided crossing. The one minimum between levels that do interact sits at half the field, behind a level of the other kind.

symmetry · Representation One spectrum along three directions, and three different sets of estimates. The two-state estimate gap ÷ 2d for every pair of the shell's functions the field couples, with the field along z, along x and at the tilt the defect sweep used. Along z there are three distinct estimates, along x three different ones and at the tilt eight, none equal to any of the axial three. The exact spectrum is identical along all three directions, and its two minima are drawn as vertical lines: the one between coupled levels at 0.0196 and the tangency of uncoupled levels at 0.0400. An estimate is a property of the axes the functions were written along, and a feature is not.

Two levels cannot make a minimum

The one minimum between coupled levels in a Stark shell sits at 0.0196 of the s–p gap, and the nearest two-state estimate at 0.0192 — two per cent away, which reads as the estimates having been aimed at the right feature all along. They were not. Two coupled levels only ever separate, so no estimate can be where its own pair is closest. The minimum belongs to a third level, exists only while the d level sits within a quarter of the s–p gap, and meets the estimate by crossing it.

symmetry · Representation

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

DegeneracyMatrix elementModel limitStark effectAngular momentumPerturbation theoryQuantum defectSymmetry breakingBasisConvergence

All concepts