sp³ hybrids — where it appears
Named by 6 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Hybridisation does not explain
Methane's photoelectron spectrum has two bands, not one. Four equivalent sp³ bonding orbitals cannot produce that, and the resolution is that hybridisation was never a claim about what a measurement would find.
Hybrids are a basis
An sp³ hybrid set is an orthogonal matrix applied to the atomic orbitals. Rotating a basis changes no observable, so asking whether the electrons are really in hybrids is asking which coordinate system nature prefers.
Bent's rule, against the substituent series
More electronegative substituents get more p character, so the angle between them shrinks. The rule predicts a trend, the trend is observed, and the quantity it depends on turns out not to be one quantity.
The angle does not fix the hybridisation
Two equivalent hybrids are orthogonal only at one relation between their s character and the angle between them. Run it backwards on measured bond angles and water's bonds come out sp³·⁹⁹, hydrogen sulfide's sp²⁷, and phosphine's lone pair takes eighty-four per cent of the one s orbital.
The localisation transformation, demonstrated
Four equivalent bonds or one a₁ and three t₂ — two descriptions of methane's bonding electrons that disagree about everything except the electron density, which they agree about to the last bit a double can hold.
Hybrids that were never orthogonal
Two sp³ hybrids are orthogonal at 109.47° and nowhere else. Water's are drawn at 104.5° and overlap by 0.062; cyclopropane's are drawn at 60° and overlap by 0.625, which is not a small correction to a basis but a description that has stopped being one.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
BasisHybridisationOrthogonalityBond angleLocalisationLone pairs characterTetrahedral angleUnitary transformationBent's ruleCanonical orbitalsElectronegativity