Unitary transformation — where it appears
Named by 19 essays across 7 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Hybridisation does not explain
Methane's photoelectron spectrum has two bands, not one. Four equivalent sp³ bonding orbitals cannot produce that, and the resolution is that hybridisation was never a claim about what a measurement would find.
Hybrids are a basis
An sp³ hybrid set is an orthogonal matrix applied to the atomic orbitals. Rotating a basis changes no observable, so asking whether the electrons are really in hybrids is asking which coordinate system nature prefers.
Complex harmonics against real ones
The p orbitals every chemist draws are not eigenfunctions of anything. They are real combinations of the complex solutions, chosen because they point along axes — and the choice is invisible until a magnetic field makes it matter.
The localisation transformation, demonstrated
Four equivalent bonds or one a₁ and three t₂ — two descriptions of methane's bonding electrons that disagree about everything except the electron density, which they agree about to the last bit a double can hold.
The projector is unique, the basis is not
A reduction says how many times each representation appears. It cannot say which combinations of orbitals they are — that takes a projection operator, and for a degenerate representation the operator returns a different pair of orbitals depending on which function it is handed first. Both pairs are correct, they span the same space, and every energy computed from either is identical.
Four centres, and the pair that will not localise
The occupied orbitals of a molecule can be mixed freely without changing anything observable, and the freedom is usually spent on making them as local as possible. For the methyllithium tetramer the answer is four centres — one carbon and the three lithiums of the face it caps — and no mixing of the four pairs reduces it.
Two bent bonds, or a σ and a π
A carbon–carbon double bond is drawn two ways and the two look like rival claims about what is there. They are one occupied space in two bases, related by a rotation of exactly forty-five degrees: the density is identical to the last bit a double holds, the bent pair are sp⁵ hybrids at 50.77° to the axis, and their charge sits 0.235 Å off the plane of the molecule where neither canonical orbital's does.
One scale, from two centres to a cage
How many centres a pair of electrons holds together is two different numbers, and they separate exactly where the bonding is most deficient: the methyllithium tetramer's pairs sit on four atoms each and have a participation number of 2.54. Run the same measurement up the scale and the twelve-vertex borane refuses it — its localisation has at least ten maxima differing by six parts in a thousand, so the number of centres is not an output for it at all.
Three bent bonds, and the same hybrid
A triple bond localises into three bent bonds at 101.537 degrees to one another, each an sp⁵ hybrid with exactly one sixth s character. A double bond's two bent components are sp⁵ hybrids at 101.537 degrees. The two are the same hybrid, built out of different frameworks and in different numbers, and the reason is that a third of a half is a half of a third.
How many descriptions a cage has
A localisation is a maximisation, and running it once reports the maximum it reached rather than the maximum there is. Run to exhaustion on a twelve-vertex borane it finds ten answers and then three batches of twelve starts in a row that find nothing new — and none of the ten is another one seen from a different side, because a symmetry of the cage cannot change a multiset of participation numbers and all ten multisets differ.
An integer nobody measured
The oxidation state of chromium in the hexacarbonyl is zero. Its charge, computed from the same wavefunction, is anywhere between −3.04 and −0.98 depending on how the shared electrons are divided — and the integer sits outside that whole range. The electron count, meanwhile, is eighteen at every point on it.
The answer a search is most likely to give
If a cage has ten equally good localised descriptions, why does the literature agree about its picture? The hoped-for answer was that one basin is very large. Counting four hundred and eighty starting points says it is not: two independent searches agree one time in ten, and the description they most often return is not the best one.
The hybrids that point outside the bonds
Coulson's relation says two equivalent hybrids sharing an s orbital are orthogonal only between ninety and a hundred and eighty degrees. Cyclopropane's carbons make sixty, so its ring hybrids cannot point at the atoms they bond to — and the same relation says by how much they miss: 22.75 degrees each, falling to 0.03 in cyclohexane.
The angle that does not have to be searched for
A carbonyl's two bent components have no symmetry making them equivalent, so the mixing that best localises them looks like something to search for and their s characters look like two different numbers. Neither happens. The localisation functional is a quadratic with no linear term, so its maximum is at forty-five degrees or at the ends — bent bonds or canonical ones, decided by one inequality, with nothing in between.
Where the count stops being an effort
A cage's localised descriptions were counted by a search that stopped when it stopped finding new ones, which makes the count a property of the stopping rule. Run to four thousand starts the count is fourteen and the last new description appears at start 124 — after which three thousand eight hundred and seventy-six starts add nothing. The four rarest are found six times in a thousand, which is what says nothing rarer is hiding.
Three shapes from one search
A cage's fourteen localised descriptions fell into two groups with a factor of five between them and nothing in the gap, which made counting the big basins look like a stopping rule. Two more cases from the same family give a smooth tail over sixty-three descriptions and a single basin holding ninety-eight per cent. One search, one family, three shapes.
An interior maximum a third orbital allows
Two orbitals related by a mirror plane give a Boys functional with no linear term, so it has no interior maximum and no angle is ever searched for. Add the oxygen lone pair and the search over a three-dimensional rotation group finds one — eight and a half degrees of lone pair mixed into two bent bonds, worth a further two and a half per cent that no pair of orbitals could reach.
The five figures were an identity
Two lone pairs satisfy the two-orbital mixing criterion by a margin of 1.732128, against √3 = 1.732051 — agreement to five figures on a number assembled from three integrals over a numerical grid. It is exact. The criterion is the reciprocal of the p amplitude of the outward hybrid, and everything else in the molecule cancels out of it.
The basis a diagonaliser happened to return
Six of the cage family's thirty-three inputs have their occupied set cut through the middle of a degenerate shell, and the members of a degenerate shell are interchangeable. Re-orienting the shell changes nothing about the cage, the filling or the criterion — and it moves the best localisation functional by up to twenty-one per cent, moves the count of descriptions from ten to fourteen, and flips the degeneracy label on three of the six.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
LocalisationCanonical orbitalsModel limitBasisClosed formConventionOrthogonalityDegeneracyLocal minimumMulticentre bondingOverlap integralElectron-deficient bonding