Molecular Geometry & Bonding
what the shape decides
Concept

Bond angle — where it appears

The angle subtended at an atom by two of its neighbours. It is a property of a set of coordinates, and a measured one is an average over the vibrational motion rather than the value at the potential's minimum.

Named by 22 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

4 sites, minimised. The arrangement of 4 points on a sphere that minimises their mutual repulsion. The angles printed were measured off the result rather than quoted, and the shape was not assumed.

VSEPR, computed

The tetrahedral angle is not 109.5 degrees because a textbook says so. It is arccos(−1/3), and it falls out of minimising the repulsion of four points on a sphere without ever being written down.

shape · VSEPR water — C2v. The molecule with the point group found from its coordinates rather than looked up: every candidate operation was applied and kept when it permuted the atoms among themselves.

Why water is bent

The standard answer is lone pair repulsion, it predicts the right direction, and it cannot predict the magnitude. A better rule can, and the heavier hydrides show where both accounts run out.

shape · VSEPR sp3 hybrids. The directions the hybrids point, with the angle between them computed from the coefficients rather than quoted. The set is an orthogonal transformation of the atomic orbitals, so it describes the same space in different coordinates.

Bent's rule, against the substituent series

More electronegative substituents get more p character, so the angle between them shrinks. The rule predicts a trend, the trend is observed, and the quantity it depends on turns out not to be one quantity.

shape · VSEPR Bond angle against lone-pair weight, 2 lone and 2 bonding. The bond angle a weighted repulsion minimisation gives for 2 lone pairs and 2 bonding pairs, as the lone-pair weight runs from one to 3.2. The marked molecules are water and hydrogen sulfide, each placed at the weight that reproduces its measured angle.

What a lone pair is worth

A lone pair repels more than a bonding pair, says VSEPR, without saying how much more. Put a number on it and fit that number to water, and the same number is wrong for hydrogen sulfide by a factor of two — which means it was never a property of a lone pair.

shape · VSEPR Angles at exponents 1, 2, 3, 6, 12. The distinct angles of the minimised arrangement of 4, 5, 6, 7 points, under a repulsion going as one over r to the power 1, 2, 3, 6, 12. Where the arrangement is the maximally symmetric one the angles do not move at all; where it is not, both the angles and how many of them there are depend on the law assumed.

Which angles are symmetry and which are the model

VSEPR says electron pairs repel and never says by what law. For four, five and six domains it makes no difference whatever — change the exponent by a factor of twelve and not one angle moves. For seven it decides the answer.

shape · VSEPR The s character a bond angle requires. The fraction of the one s orbital each of two equivalent hybrids must carry in order to meet at a given angle, from pure p at 90 degrees to half s at 180. The marks are measured bond angles — H₂O, NH₃, H₂S, PH₃ — and the column beside them is the budget each implies: what one bond hybrid takes, and what is left for the lone pairs to share. The relation is orthogonality, not a model of bonding, and nothing here is fitted.

The angle does not fix the hybridisation

Two equivalent hybrids are orthogonal only at one relation between their s character and the angle between them. Run it backwards on measured bond angles and water's bonds come out sp³·⁹⁹, hydrogen sulfide's sp²⁷, and phosphine's lone pair takes eighty-four per cent of the one s orbital.

shape · Hybrids How far two hybrids are from orthogonal. The overlap between two equivalent s–p hybrids of a stated label, against the angle between them. Each curve crosses zero at exactly one angle — sp3 at 109.47°, sp2 at 120.00°, sp at 180.00° — and a molecule whose measured angle is not that angle has hybrids that overlap. The largest here is cyclopropane at 0.63.

Hybrids that were never orthogonal

Two sp³ hybrids are orthogonal at 109.47° and nowhere else. Water's are drawn at 104.5° and overlap by 0.062; cyclopropane's are drawn at 60° and overlap by 0.625, which is not a small correction to a basis but a description that has stopped being one.

shape · Hybrids The largest angle each ring size can have. The ceiling on a bond angle in a closed ring of equal bonds, 180°(n−2)/n, which is the interior angle of the regular planar polygon and follows from a closed curve having to turn through a full circle. The line at 109.47° is the tetrahedral angle: rings of 3, 4, 5 atoms cannot reach it at any geometry whatever, and every larger ring can, by leaving the plane.

The angle a ring cannot have

A closed ring of equal bonds has to turn through a full circle, so its bond angles cannot average more than 180°(n−2)/n. Three, four and five atoms are below the tetrahedral angle at every geometry whatever; six is above it, and reaches it only by leaving the plane.

shape · Strain A 6-ring at 111°: the twist-boat. A closed ring of 6 equal bonds meeting at 111°, drawn from the coordinates the closure conditions produce. Its torsions are 16.9°, -63.6°, 44.2° and repeat; its puckering amplitude is 0.508 bond lengths at a phase of 344°, with q₃ exactly zero, so it lies on the equator. Turning the ring changes none of those numbers, which is what makes them a description of the shape rather than of the view.

The ring that cannot hold still

Cyclohexane's chair is rigid and its boat is not, and that is a statement about the rank of a matrix rather than about strain. Hold every bond length and every bond angle fixed and count what is left: the chair has nothing, and the boat sits on a continuous loop of shapes with the same bonds and the same angles.

shape · Strain The bond sum, the measurement, and what is left over. For each pyramid: the vector sum of three bond moments estimated from the electronegativity difference and the measured geometry, the measured dipole, and the difference between them. Positive is towards the lone pair. Ammonia's bonds point that way and nitrogen trifluoride's point the other, which is why the trifluoride's far more polar bonds give it a dipole six times smaller. The leftover is 0.58 D for ammonia and at least 1.48 D for the trifluoride, so it is not one lone pair's property.

The lone pair is not the missing term

Ammonia's dipole is 1.47 debye and nitrogen trifluoride's is 0.235, although the N–F bonds are far more polar than the N–H ones. The bond sums explain the reversal exactly and point in opposite directions — and the lone pair that is supposed to make up the difference has to be worth 0.58 debye in one molecule and at least 1.48 in the other.

shape · Dipole Which site a long bond takes, and it is not the one the rule says. The energy of the axial placement minus the energy of the equatorial one, against the odd bond's length. Above the line the equatorial placement wins and below it the axial one does. The textbook sentence is that a bulkier group goes equatorial where there is more room; given a longer bond and nothing else, the repulsion model puts it AXIAL, at every length, by a margin that grows. A site pushed further out interacts with everything less, so what is left to decide is the arrangement of the four sites left behind — and three equatorial with one axial is the better set of four.

The sites are not the same size

Every arrangement in this collection puts its sites on one sphere, which is an assumption about bond lengths made silently. Give the repulsion model a bond length and it predicts that the long bond goes axial — the opposite of the rule the model is always cited for.

shape · VSEPR The twist the ring forces on the bond. For each ring size, the largest torsion about the double bond that the ring will close on — 180° being a flat trans arrangement and 90° being a π bond broken outright. The six-ring will not close at any torsion tested. The eight-ring reaches 139.3°, against 136° measured in trans-cyclooctene by diffraction: a model with bond lengths and bond angles in it and no energy anywhere agrees with the crystal to a few degrees.

The double bond a ring cannot hold

A trans double bond needs a ring of nine carbons to sit flat, and the eight-ring will hold one twisted by 40.7 degrees — against 136 degrees measured in trans-cyclooctene. The same eight-ring threshold, applied by counting ring sizes, sorts nine bridgehead alkenes correctly with no bridgehead anywhere in the argument.

shape · Strain water, drawn with its nuclei the size they are. The molecule with a disc round each nucleus whose radius is the computed root-mean-square displacement of that nucleus in the vibrational ground state. The hydrogens' discs are a substantial fraction of the bond length, and this is at no temperature at all.

The atoms are not at the points

Every structure in this collection is a set of points, and every bond angle it argues about is a property of that set. Computed from the fitted force fields it already has, water's hydrogens are 0.094 Å from where they are drawn and its bond angle has a spread of 8.9 degrees — larger than the difference between 104.5 and the tetrahedral value that half the essays here are about. This is at no temperature at all.

shape · Approximation Flat rings: the angles, the torsions and what is measured. For each ring from three to eight, held flat: its interior angle, how far that is from tetrahedral, the angle strain that follows, the torsional strain of having every bond eclipsed, and the measured strain energy. The five-ring is the row the essay is about — its angles are almost ideal and it is strained.

The strain that is not in the angles

Cyclopentane's flat bond angles are 108°, a degree and a half from tetrahedral, and its angle strain computed from a standard bending constant is 0.4 kJ mol⁻¹. Its measured strain is twenty-six. The missing sixty kilojoules are torsional — one ethane barrier for every bond in the ring, which no account built on bond angles mentions.

shape · Strain The same angles, the same torsions, and not the same molecule. twelve closed conformers of a ring of 10 at a bond angle of 111.5 degrees. Every one has exactly the same bond angles, so an account built from angles and torsions places them all on the horizontal axis alone. The vertical axis is the closest approach of two atoms four or more bonds apart, which no term in that account mentions: two of these differ by 0.08 kilojoules in torsional energy and by 0.75 ångström in how close they come.

The atoms that meet across a ring

Twelve closed conformers of a ten-membered ring at one bond angle, so every one has identical angle strain by construction. Two of them differ by 0.026 kilojoules a mole in torsional energy and by 0.80 ångström in how close two atoms on opposite sides of the ring come — 2.331 against 3.131, where two carbons are in contact at about 3.4. An account built from angles and torsions calls those two structures the same.

shape · Strain Three bent bonds, at a hundred and one degrees to each other. A carbon–carbon triple bond in its localised description: three equivalent bent bonds, spaced by 101.54 degrees, each tilted 63.43 degrees off the axis and each carrying 0.17 of an s orbital — an sp⁵ hybrid. Its charge sits 0.32 ångström off the axis, where every canonical orbital's sits on it. The mixing that makes the three equivalent is a rotation in the three-dimensional occupied space, so the density is untouched.

Three bent bonds, and the same hybrid

A triple bond localises into three bent bonds at 101.537 degrees to one another, each an sp⁵ hybrid with exactly one sixth s character. A double bond's two bent components are sp⁵ hybrids at 101.537 degrees. The two are the same hybrid, built out of different frameworks and in different numbers, and the reason is that a third of a half is a half of a third.

shape · Hybrids The 6-ring at 111.5°: the alternating form and what a search finds. The alternating ring — every atom displaced above or below the plane in turn — with its dihedral angles and its two strain terms, beside the lowest-torsion member a search constrained only by bond angles and closure returns. Both satisfy every geometric constraint; only one of them is staggered.

The explanation with the wrong sign

Two methyl groups on one carbon make a ring easier to close, by up to eleven thousand-fold, and the textbook reason is that they compress the ring's internal angle. Computed from a standard bending term, that compression helps a three-ring and a four-ring and hinders every ring from five up — predicting a slowing of 0.754-fold for the five-ring measured to speed up 250-fold. The account with the right sign is about rotations rather than angles, and it has a ceiling of 36.5 that the measurement is already above.

shape · Strain The ceiling rises and the measurements fall, so they cross. The largest acceleration the rotamer account can produce, against the ring being closed, with the measured gem-dimethyl accelerations on the same axis. Closing a bigger ring means freezing more rotations, so the ceiling rises steeply; the measurements go the other way. The five-membered ring's 250-fold acceleration is above its own ceiling of 36.5 and the six-membered ring's tenfold one is far below its 121 — so the account is refused at one size and sufficient at the next.

A ceiling that rises where the measurements fall

The rotamer account of the gem-dimethyl effect has a largest possible acceleration, which looks like a limitation. It is a prediction: the ceiling is a closed form in the number of rotations a closure freezes, it rises steeply with ring size, and the measurements fall — so the account is refuted for the five-membered ring and more than sufficient for the six.

shape · Strain The hybrids do not point at the atoms. For each cycloalkane, the angle between its two ring hybrids — fixed by orthogonality once the measured H–C–H angle has said how much s character the hydrogens take — against the angle between its carbons. Cyclopropane's differ by 45.5°, so each hybrid points 22.75° outside the bond it makes; cyclohexane's agree to 0.035°, which is the control.

The hybrids that point outside the bonds

Coulson's relation says two equivalent hybrids sharing an s orbital are orthogonal only between ninety and a hundred and eighty degrees. Cyclopropane's carbons make sixty, so its ring hybrids cannot point at the atoms they bond to — and the same relation says by how much they miss: 22.75 degrees each, falling to 0.03 in cyclohexane.

bonding · Hybrids How far the rotor count would have to be wrong. The ceiling against the number of rotations a closure freezes, with the two measured accelerations drawn across it. The five-membered closure freezes three and its ceiling is 36.46; the ceiling does not reach the measured 250 until 5 rotors, so the count would have to be wrong by 2 on a ring that has three rotations to freeze. The six-membered closure freezes four at a ceiling of 120.88, and stays above its measured 10 down to 2 — so the refusal is airtight and the sufficiency is comfortable.

An estimate that can be wrong by two

The ceiling on the gem-dimethyl effect is exponential in the number of rotations a closure freezes, and that number was taken as n − 2 without counting — which left the refutation at five rings probable rather than airtight. It is airtight. The ceiling does not reach the measured 250 until five rotors, on a ring that has three, and no hindering of the tether can raise it.

shape · Strain What each of these predictors cannot see. Four predictors built elsewhere in this collection, each audited by its ties: the share of the variation in what was measured that the predictor demonstrably cannot account for, because two systems it assigns the same number to were measured to differ by that much. the spin-only moment leaves 23 per cent; the VSEPR angle leaves 92 per cent; the highest occupied Hückel eigenvalue leaves 41 per cent. The control has no ties at all and the instrument returns nothing for it, which is what it must do. No fitting anywhere: a tie is a claim a model of that form cannot escape.

Two systems a model cannot tell apart

Two molecules that share a Hückel eigenvalue but were measured to differ bound a whole family of models at 0.456 eV. That is a reusable instrument, and chemistry has plenty of predictors of exactly the same shape. Turned on themselves: VSEPR cannot account for 92 per cent of the variation in the four angles it predicts, and no fitting is involved anywhere.

bonding · Models The mass is worth a factor of 1.6, and the other two 1e+4 and 9e+4. Ammonia's umbrella well, with each of phosphine's three differences substituted into it one at a time and then all together. The reduced mass is 11 per cent larger and costs a factor of 1.61. The pyramid is 2.01 times taller and costs 9.6e+3; the barrier is 6.1 times higher and costs 9.4e+4. Phosphine's own splitting is below what the arithmetic resolves, so it is drawn at that bound.

It was never the mass

Phosphine does not invert, and the reason given is that phosphorus is heavier than nitrogen. Three things about phosphine differ from ammonia. Substituting each into ammonia's own well one at a time, the reduced mass costs a factor of 1.61, the pyramid height costs 9,600 and the barrier 94,000 — and the mass is the smallest of the three by four orders of magnitude.

shape · Inversion

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Model limitMinimisationTetrahedral angleLocal minimumLone pairVSEPRConformationConventionElastic energyHybridisationRepulsions character

All concepts