Orbital approximation — where it appears
Named by 4 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Orbitals are not where the electron is
A many-electron atom has no exact orbitals at all. The orbital picture is a basis for an approximation — an extremely good one — and treating it as a description of reality is the source of most of the confusion in this subject.
The aufbau order is not a property of the atom
Iron's 3d orbital is more than four times smaller than its 4s and, by every one-electron estimate available, far lower in energy. The 4s fills first anyway, and it empties first too — which is not a paradox but a sign that the filling order was never a list of orbital energies.
A correction computed at one length
The counterpoise correction is expensive, so it is evaluated once at a reference geometry and subtracted across a whole potential surface. A constant does not move a minimum — so a frozen correction returns the uncorrected bond length exactly, at every reference geometry and in every basis, and everything the correction does to a structure is the part that has just been thrown away.
The hybrids that point outside the bonds
Coulson's relation says two equivalent hybrids sharing an s orbital are orthogonal only between ninety and a hundred and eighty degrees. Cyclopropane's carbons make sixty, so its ring hybrids cannot point at the atoms they bond to — and the same relation says by how much they miss: 22.75 degrees each, falling to 0.03 in cyclohexane.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Closed formHartree–FockMany-electron wavefunctionsModel limitOne-electron modelsOverlap integralthe aufbau principleBasisBasis setBond angleBond lengthBorn–Oppenheimer separation