The collection

Every essay — page 14

Page 14 of 42, continuing through the fields in the same order.

Orbitals Where the atoms go Bonding models What symmetry decides Beyond the octet What a spectrum settles When the molecule does not stop What the shape is for What is taught wrongly Series Named objects Orbitals Refutations Search

Bonding models

Valence bond, molecular orbital, and hybrids — three descriptions of one thing, related by transformations that change no observable.

The unpaired electron's level stays put while its spin moves to the far end. Above, the trio's three levels as the overlap of A with C is raised from 0.25 to 0.45 while B's stays at 0.25. The lowest falls from -16.26 to -17.07 eV and the highest rises from -8.02 to -2.78 eV; the middle one, which holds the radical's unpaired electron, stays at −13.6 eV. Below, the spin on A and on B over the same change: from a half each to 0.236 on A and 0.764 on B, with the ratio of squared overlaps drawn as open circles on top.

The spin the count does not hold

Three orbitals in a row keep one level at the free-atom energy however the overlap of one end is changed, and at three electrons that level holds the radical's unpaired electron. Its energy does not move. Its spin does: from half on each end to 0.236 and 0.764 as one overlap goes from 0.25 to 0.45, exactly the squared ratio of the two overlaps, at every energy of the middle orbital. A coupling between the ends moves the level and cannot move the spin. The energy and the spin are answering to different things.

6 figures
The one-bend family was one angular ring at its ends and two everywhere else. Filled circles: the worst spread within a separation class for the eight nine-ring chains built by bending one fusion, placed at the angular rings each actually has. The chains bent at the first and last fusions have one angular ring, next to an end; the six bent in between have two adjacent angular rings whose turns cancel. The lower line is a single angular ring at each interior position, running 3.05, 3.66, 3.46, 3.03, 3.46, 3.66, 3.05; the upper line is two adjacent ones, running 4.30, 4.60, 4.06, 4.06, 4.60, 4.30. Every published point lies on one line or the other.

The scatter counts angular rings

Eight nine-ring chains built by turning one fusion looked like one bend moved along a molecule. They were two families: one angular ring when the turned fusion is at an end, two adjacent angular rings everywhere else. Built from stated angular rings instead, twenty-seven chains show the ring-current scatter ignores which way a ring turns, does not grow with how many turn, and is mostly explained by one count per pair — each angular ring between two rings multiplies their response by 0.60, each one under them by 0.65.

6 figures
Two contributions of opposite sign, and where they cancel. The two terms of the give-back's numerator on a six-site ring, with the interaction reaching two bonds at half the strength of one. The first term is what the correlation hole returns at one bond and the second is what it costs at two — and they have opposite signs, because penalising pairs at two bonds depletes them where a one-bond interaction enhanced them. The numerator vanishes where the two are equal and opposite, which is not where either is zero.

A cancellation between two separations

The give-back's numerator has one term in it, so its root is the repulsion at which the pair count at one bond returns to its free value. Let the interaction reach two bonds and the numerator has two terms with opposite signs, and its root becomes a cancellation between an enhancement at one separation and a depletion at the next — at a repulsion where neither is at its free value. Which side of the old zero the new root falls on reverses between a reach of a third and a half, because whether two bonds are enhanced or depleted is the interaction's own doing.

6 figures
With both changes on, the spin no longer ignores the coupling. The spin on the far end A against the A–C overlap asymmetry, at five strengths of coupling. Dashed lines are the sum of the two separate effects, which is the overlap's curve alone, since the coupling alone never moved the spin. The solid lines run below it: with the coupling on, the same asymmetry pushes the spin further from a half.

Two changes that do not add

A three-orbital radical keeps its unpaired electron's level fixed when one end's overlap changes, and keeps its spin fixed when the two ends are coupled — two changes, two quantities, and each change touches only one of them. Put both on at once, as in a bent radical with one end nearer the middle, and the separation dissolves. The level feels the overlap asymmetry, the spin feels the coupling, the electron reaches the middle orbital, the middle orbital's energy starts to decide the spin, and the spin becomes a matter of how overlap is partitioned — except at one special point, where every site energy is equal and a different reason from the one given keeps the partitions together.

6 figures
Repulsion puts negative spin on the middle orbital. The spin on the middle orbital of the symmetric three-orbital radical against the on-site repulsion, solved exactly. With no repulsion it is zero: the singly occupied orbital has a node there, and one determinant cannot put negative spin anywhere. With repulsion it is negative at once, and it reaches −0.20 at 8 eV. The shaded band is the allyl radical's central carbon, from its measured proton hyperfine coupling of +4.06 gauss read through McConnell's relation — which the trio meets at a repulsion between 5.5 and 6.9 eV.

Spin below zero

A three-orbital radical read from its singly occupied orbital has no spin on its middle orbital unless its ends are both unequal and coupled — and never negative spin anywhere. Solved exactly with an on-site repulsion, the middle orbital goes negative at once, reaches the allyl radical's measured −0.15 to −0.18 at a repulsion of five and a half to seven electronvolts, and responds to the end–end coupling at first order where the one-determinant leak responds at second. The two have opposite signs, so in a bent, unequal radical the middle orbital's spin falls and then rises, and the unequal ends that let the leak in drain most of the polarisation first.

8 figures
The on-site repulsion allyl needs rises with the neighbour's. The on-site repulsion U at which the three-orbital radical's middle spin matches the allyl radical's, against the repulsion V₁ between each end and the middle, with the end–end repulsion in its Mataga–Nishimoto proportion. The band is the range McConnell's Q allows and the line the value the coupling ratio fixes without Q. With no neighbour repulsion U is 6.1 eV; it rises about nine tenths of an electronvolt for each one of V₁. Where V₁ is the Mataga–Nishimoto value computed from U itself, U is 10.89 eV — against Pariser's valence-state 11.13 for carbon. Ohno's formula overshoots, to 13.8.

Six electronvolts was a difference

A three-orbital radical solved with an on-site repulsion reproduced the allyl radical's negative central spin at a repulsion of about six electronvolts — six tenths of what a carbon atom's own charges cost. Add the repulsion between neighbouring sites and the repulsion allyl needs rises almost one for one with it. With the neighbour values π-electron theory uses, it lands within a quarter of an electronvolt of Pariser's 11.13 for carbon. And the band McConnell's constant left can be closed without that constant at all.

7 figures
The repulsion allyl needs follows the energy the hopping is built from. With carbon's own 2pπ overlaps at allyl's geometry, the on-site repulsion that reproduces allyl's central spin of −0.164 against the magnitude of the orbital energy the Wolfsberg–Helmholz rule multiplies, for neighbour repulsions from Mataga–Nishimoto and from Ohno. At carbon's −11.4 eV they give 9.49 and 12.68 eV, either side of Pariser's 11.13; Mataga–Nishimoto reaches 11.13 only at -14.4 eV, near hydrogen's −13.6 that the trio used.

The agreement was hydrogen's energy

A three-orbital radical solved exactly with on-site and neighbour repulsion reproduced the allyl radical's central spin at an on-site repulsion of 10.89 eV, a quarter of an electronvolt from Pariser's 11.13 for carbon. Its hopping, 2.91 eV, was never allyl's: it came from a round overlap of 0.25 and hydrogen's energy of −13.6 eV. Computed from carbon, the overlap barely changes — carbon's own 2pπ overlap at 1.39 Å is 0.248 — but the energy does, and with carbon's −11.4 eV the hopping is 2.34 eV, Pariser and Parr's own β. Then the repulsion allyl needs is 9.49 eV with one standard form of the neighbour terms and 12.68 with the other. Pariser's value sits between them, not on either.

8 figures
Three terms in the numerator, and one place they cancel. The three contributions to the give-back's numerator on a six-site ring whose interaction falls as one over the distance round the ring — a half at two bonds, a third at the antipode — with their sum. The sum crosses zero once, at V = 5.9198, where the one-bond and antipodal terms are negative and the two-bond term positive: the two-bond enhancement is paying for depletions on either side of it.

A root that moves when nothing else does

Give the ring of six an interaction that falls off as one over the distance and the give-back's numerator has three terms. It still has one root, and at that root every separation's pair change has the opposite sign from the two-bond case. But the root has a weakness the earlier essays never tested: lower the interaction by the same amount at every separation and not one state changes, while the root moves — by as much as the reach of the interaction did, and out of existence altogether if the zero is put at one bond.

8 figures
The factor an angular ring costs is a property of the chain's length. The two fitted factors — what each angular ring between a pair of rings, and each angular ring the pair sits on, multiplies the pair's ring-current response by — refitted on every chain of seven, nine and eleven rings. Between: 0.656, 0.593, 0.542. On: 0.681, 0.630, 0.587. The open circles are the published fit on twenty-seven chosen nine-ring chains, 0.602 and 0.655. The fit explains the same share of the variation at every length, R² 0.938, 0.939, 0.939: the form transfers and the numbers do not.

The angular factor belongs to the chain

Each angular ring between two rings of a fused chain multiplied their ring-current response by 0.60, on nine rings. Refitted on every chain of seven, nine and eleven rings, the same two counts explain the same 93.9 per cent of the variation at all three lengths — and the factor runs 0.656, 0.593, 0.542. The form transfers and the number does not, because it is the ratio of a zigzag's decay, which is the same at every length, to a straight chain's, which lengthens as its gap closes.

7 figures
Along the series one pair crosses the boundary, and it is the one nobody asks about. The two-orbital criterion's margin for each pair of the carbonyl-type trio as the heteroatom runs through carbon, nitrogen, oxygen and fluorine at one bond length. Above one the mixed description wins. The σ–π margin falls from far off the scale to 1.179 and never reaches the boundary; the π–n margin rises from 0.470 to 1.350 and crosses it between oxygen and fluorine. The σ–n margin is drawn faint because the criterion does not apply to that pair at all.

A verdict that flips and changes nothing

Run the two-orbital mixing criterion along H₂C=CH⁻, H₂C=NH, H₂C=O and H₂C=F⁺ and one pair finally crosses its boundary — the π and the lone pair, a third of the way from oxygen to fluorine. It is the first real test the criterion has had, and the localised orbitals on the far side of it are the ones on the near side: two bent bonds and a lone pair that stays itself.

7 figures

Orbitals

A one-electron wavefunction, drawn as a contour surface at a level somebody chose. Nodes, signs, and what the picture is a picture of.