Zero-point energy — where it appears
Named by 17 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The atoms are not at the points
Every structure in this collection is a set of points, and every bond angle it argues about is a property of that set. Computed from the fitted force fields it already has, water's hydrogens are 0.094 Å from where they are drawn and its bond angle has a spread of 8.9 degrees — larger than the difference between 104.5 and the tetrahedral value that half the essays here are about. This is at no temperature at all.
The bond length that depends on the isotope
Hydrogen chloride and deuterium chloride have the same potential energy curve, and their measured equilibrium lengths agree to three hundredths of a milliångström. Their average bond lengths differ by 4.34 mÅ — a hundred times more — because a lighter atom explores more of a well that is not symmetric.
The mode that moves least radiates most
Boron trifluoride's strongest infrared band is the one in which the fluorines barely move: ninety per cent of the motion belongs to the boron, which is a fifth of the molecule's mass. The mode that moves the most mass is nine and a half times weaker. Across five molecules the rank correlation between band strength and how far the atoms actually go runs from +1 to −0.66, and every normal mode carries exactly the same weighted motion by construction.
A band is a filter on the modes
A photoelectron band's vibrational structure reports the frequencies of a few of the ion's vibrations and is silent about the rest, and which few is decided by the point group before any geometry is known. Under a change of shape that lengthens every bond alike, methane's totally symmetric stretch gets a Huang–Rhys factor of 0.905 and its other eight modes get between 10⁻²⁸ and 10⁻³⁵.
The coordinate an isotope reports
Kraitchman's equations return an atom's position from the change in the moments when that atom alone is made heavier, and for a rigid structure they are an identity — formaldehyde's four atoms come back to a part in ten million. What they return is the square of each coordinate, so both hydrogens at b = ±0.9348 come back at +0.9348; every out-of-plane coordinate comes back imaginary at a moment error of one part in a hundred thousand; and the famous error cancellation, measured at a factor of thirteen, still leaves the answer two and a half times worse than a direct fit.
The correction that was invented
A standard error model puts the zero-point error in a rotational constant at a few tenths of a per cent, shared between the three moments by invented weights, with the parent and its deuterated form differing by five. Computed from a force field it is 1.88 per cent, one of the three shares is negative, and the mismatch is 35 — so the cancellation the substitution method rests on is worth a factor of 2.5 and not thirteen.
An expression for what was a warning
The zero-point correction to a moment of inertia comes out at 1.88 per cent where a few tenths had been assumed, and heavy molecules are safer. Written out, the correction is a mean curvature times the sum of reciprocal wavenumbers over the moment — one line, evaluated from things a spectroscopist has before starting. One coefficient serves four molecules whose corrections span a factor of eleven.
The axis that goes the other way
One dimensionless coefficient turned a zero-point correction into an expression a spectroscopist could evaluate, and the three principal axes were averaged over to get it. Split by axis it gets worse, not better — the coefficients span 2.3 where the molecule-averaged ones span 1.36 — and water's smallest moment does not grow at all. It shrinks.
Two moments about two different lines
Asked axis by axis, the substitution method's near-cancellation gives numbers as large as 163 per cent. The arithmetic is the smaller half of the answer. A principal axis is an eigenvector of a tensor built from the masses, so one deuterium turns water's frame by 21.12° — and the two moments being compared are not moments about the same line.
The term a harmonic field cannot produce
The usual zero-point correction to a moment of inertia comes from a harmonic force field, which contains the mean square displacement and nothing else. A rotational constant does not average that. It averages one over r squared, whose leading correction is the mean displacement — zero in any symmetric well — and which enters with the opposite sign and about twice the size.
The cubic a Morse curve guesses
The two terms in a vibrationally averaged rotational constant were computed on Morse curves built from measured constants, and the vibration–rotation constant αₑ is the measurement that tests them. In all four molecules the Morse curve's αₑ is short, by four to fifteen per cent. The averaging is not the error — it matches the closed form to four parts in ten thousand. The curve's cubic is, and the measurement asks for more of exactly the term a harmonic field cannot produce.
A barrier is not what a splitting measures
Ammonia's inversion barrier is quoted everywhere as 2020 wavenumbers. Put that number into the simplest double well its own measured geometry allows and the ground-state splitting comes out at 1.3508 against a measured 0.7935, and the excited one at 68.37 against 35.81. Both are too large because a splitting is an area under a barrier and a height is only one of its two dimensions.
Deuterium cannot tell the masses apart
A reduced mass built by holding ammonia's bonds rigid predicts a deuterated molecule differently from any constant mass, and ND₃'s splitting is measured. Run as a test, it cannot choose. Every well and every mass needs a barrier for ND₃ several per cent lower than for NH₃, every prediction of the isotope ratio from a well fitted to NH₃ overshoots by eighteen to twenty-nine per cent, and the two masses differ by less than either misses — in opposite directions in the two wells.
The ordering a manifold picks
A position-dependent mass leaves the kinetic energy with no unique quantum form, and an earlier sweep of the five orderings in use found half a per cent between them. A one-dimensional reduction is a one-dimensional manifold, a manifold has a distinguished Laplacian, and carrying it to the flat measure lands on exactly one of those five — not the one with no extra potential, and not the one anybody reaches for.
The same fraction at six times the barrier
Ammonia's two fitted barriers leave a gap that an isotope-dependent term would have to fill, and the term was sized at five per cent of the transverse zero-point difference. Phosphine can be asked the same question and cannot answer it the same way: its splitting is twenty-four orders of magnitude below anything the solver can represent, and the solver does not fail cleanly — it reports values that rise as the barrier rises. Calibrated where a splitting is still visible, the action carries the question across, and the same fraction moves phosphine's isotope ratio by sixteen per cent against ammonia's twenty-one.
The band that cannot supply what it changes
A missing transverse zero-point term was sized at five per cent of the difference between two molecules' frozen frequencies, as though the five frozen modes were one thing. They are three bands carrying 26, 50 and 24 per cent of that difference, so the requirement is not one fraction but three, spanning a factor of two — and the band a flattening pyramid changes most is the one that would have to move furthest. What survives the choice is the barrier: every version implies the same bare electronic value to one and a third per cent, because every band of a pyramidal hydride has the same isotope frequency ratio.
The steps were a square root of a mass
Replacing ammonia's hydrogens one at a time does not lower its splitting in equal steps, and the obvious readings are the potential's shape or the tunnelling arithmetic. Both lines — the ground doublet and the first excited one, which nothing in this argument has ever been fitted to — come out straight in the square root of the reduced mass and bent against the count, by a factor of eight, so the unequal steps are the shape of a square root drawn against the wrong variable. And the excited line is the one test the missing correction cannot pass by construction: it improves it threefold and over-shoots it.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Model limitReduced massConventionIsotopologueHarmonic approximationInversion splittingIsotope substitutionMoment of inertiaNormal modeApproximationBorn–Oppenheimer separationClosed form