Reduced mass — where it appears
Named by 22 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The isotope shift is arithmetic
Replace hydrogen with deuterium and every frequency drops. The usual rule says by a factor of the square root of two — and of water's three modes, not one of them does that. What is exact is a different identity, and the force constants cancel out of it.
A bond length out of a spectrum
A linear triatomic has two bond lengths and one moment of inertia, so one measurement cannot determine it. Substituting an isotope gives a second measurement on the same structure, and two equations in two unknowns have a solution — which comes out differently depending on which isotope is used.
The frequency is not the bond strength
Sulfur dioxide's S–O force constant is larger than water's O–H constant, and its stretching bands sit at a third of the frequency. A vibrational frequency carries a mass as well as a force, and the two cannot be separated by looking at a spectrum.
The six motions that are not modes
Three N minus six is quoted in every textbook and the six are almost never computed. Diagonalising a mass-weighted Hessian gives six eigenvalues at arithmetic noise, and projecting their vectors onto the three translations and three rotations written down from the geometry alone accounts for every one of them.
The rotor that stretches
A rigid rotor's lines are evenly spaced, and a real molecule's are not — it pulls itself apart as it spins. How much is not a fitting parameter: it follows from the stretching frequency by one relation, and the prediction agrees with the measured constant to a few per cent across four molecules spanning three orders of magnitude.
When a mode becomes a bond stretch
Water's two stretching modes are each exactly half in one O–H bond and half in the other, which is why neither of them belongs to a bond. Change one hydrogen to deuterium and the same force field at the same geometry gives two modes that are 99.5 and 99.7 per cent in a single bond each. Nothing about the bonding changed; a mass did.
The atoms are not at the points
Every structure in this collection is a set of points, and every bond angle it argues about is a property of that set. Computed from the fitted force fields it already has, water's hydrogens are 0.094 Å from where they are drawn and its bond angle has a spread of 8.9 degrees — larger than the difference between 104.5 and the tetrahedral value that half the essays here are about. This is at no temperature at all.
The bond length that depends on the isotope
Hydrogen chloride and deuterium chloride have the same potential energy curve, and their measured equilibrium lengths agree to three hundredths of a milliångström. Their average bond lengths differ by 4.34 mÅ — a hundred times more — because a lighter atom explores more of a well that is not symmetric.
The mode that moves least radiates most
Boron trifluoride's strongest infrared band is the one in which the fluorines barely move: ninety per cent of the motion belongs to the boron, which is a fifth of the molecule's mass. The mode that moves the most mass is nine and a half times weaker. Across five molecules the rank correlation between band strength and how far the atoms actually go runs from +1 to −0.66, and every normal mode carries exactly the same weighted motion by construction.
Three numbers is not a structure
Formaldehyde's rotational spectrum gives three constants, of which a planar molecule's are only two independent numbers, and its structure has three parameters. Seven structures are computed here that reproduce A and B to the last digit the solver carries: the C=O length runs from 1.000 to 1.300 ångström, the C–H length from 1.557 down to 0.952, and the HCH angle from 74.6 degrees to 164.5.
The coordinate an isotope reports
Kraitchman's equations return an atom's position from the change in the moments when that atom alone is made heavier, and for a rigid structure they are an identity — formaldehyde's four atoms come back to a part in ten million. What they return is the square of each coordinate, so both hydrogens at b = ±0.9348 come back at +0.9348; every out-of-plane coordinate comes back imaginary at a moment error of one part in a hundred thousand; and the famous error cancellation, measured at a factor of thirteen, still leaves the answer two and a half times worse than a direct fit.
A barrier is not what a splitting measures
Ammonia's inversion barrier is quoted everywhere as 2020 wavenumbers. Put that number into the simplest double well its own measured geometry allows and the ground-state splitting comes out at 1.3508 against a measured 0.7935, and the excited one at 68.37 against 35.81. Both are too large because a splitting is an area under a barrier and a height is only one of its two dimensions.
The exponent that runs both ways
How hard does a splitting depend on a barrier? Locally, as the power −3.5628 — and the local slope runs from −2.53 to −6.15 across the same sweep, so there is no power law. What is exact is stranger: rescaling the equation forces the mass exponent to be one below the barrier's and the geometry exponent to be twice the mass's, so the model's three sensitivities are one number and the arithmetic reproduces both identities to six decimals.
It was never the mass
Phosphine does not invert, and the reason given is that phosphorus is heavier than nitrogen. Three things about phosphine differ from ammonia. Substituting each into ammonia's own well one at a time, the reduced mass costs a factor of 1.61, the pyramid height costs 9,600 and the barrier 94,000 — and the mass is the smallest of the three by four orders of magnitude.
The mass nobody chose
Every one-dimensional treatment of ammonia's inversion needs a mass, and the measurement does not supply one. Three constructions are defensible and they give 1.35075, 0.94420 and 0.0000055 wavenumbers. The honest one is not a constant at all, and it moves the answer thirty per cent towards the measurement — which means the usual choice is the wrong one.
An ordering worth half a per cent
A mass that varies along a coordinate has no unique quantum kinetic energy, and the choice among the Hermitian orderings in use was the one thing left that could undo a forty-three per cent correction to ammonia's splitting. It cannot. The five orderings anybody uses span 0.47 per cent between them, a ninety-second of the correction, and the family only reaches the measurement at exponents three times larger than any of them.
Deuterium cannot tell the masses apart
A reduced mass built by holding ammonia's bonds rigid predicts a deuterated molecule differently from any constant mass, and ND₃'s splitting is measured. Run as a test, it cannot choose. Every well and every mass needs a barrier for ND₃ several per cent lower than for NH₃, every prediction of the isotope ratio from a well fitted to NH₃ overshoots by eighteen to twenty-nine per cent, and the two masses differ by less than either misses — in opposite directions in the two wells.
The two that are not on the line
Ammonia and its fully deuterated twin are two points, and two points cannot show a curve. Putting the partly deuterated molecules between them needs a term neither symmetric one has — three ligands of unequal mass move their own centre of mass sideways as the apex descends — and it moves the prediction by half a per cent, which is what a whole change of mass construction was worth.
The ordering a manifold picks
A position-dependent mass leaves the kinetic energy with no unique quantum form, and an earlier sweep of the five orderings in use found half a per cent between them. A one-dimensional reduction is a one-dimensional manifold, a manifold has a distinguished Laplacian, and carrying it to the flat measure lands on exactly one of those five — not the one with no extra potential, and not the one anybody reaches for.
The same fraction at six times the barrier
Ammonia's two fitted barriers leave a gap that an isotope-dependent term would have to fill, and the term was sized at five per cent of the transverse zero-point difference. Phosphine can be asked the same question and cannot answer it the same way: its splitting is twenty-four orders of magnitude below anything the solver can represent, and the solver does not fail cleanly — it reports values that rise as the barrier rises. Calibrated where a splitting is still visible, the action carries the question across, and the same fraction moves phosphine's isotope ratio by sixteen per cent against ammonia's twenty-one.
The band that cannot supply what it changes
A missing transverse zero-point term was sized at five per cent of the difference between two molecules' frozen frequencies, as though the five frozen modes were one thing. They are three bands carrying 26, 50 and 24 per cent of that difference, so the requirement is not one fraction but three, spanning a factor of two — and the band a flattening pyramid changes most is the one that would have to move furthest. What survives the choice is the barrier: every version implies the same bare electronic value to one and a third per cent, because every band of a pyramidal hydride has the same isotope frequency ratio.
The steps were a square root of a mass
Replacing ammonia's hydrogens one at a time does not lower its splitting in equal steps, and the obvious readings are the potential's shape or the tunnelling arithmetic. Both lines — the ground doublet and the first excited one, which nothing in this argument has ever been fitted to — come out straight in the square root of the reduced mass and bent against the count, by a factor of eight, so the unequal steps are the shape of a square root drawn against the wrong variable. And the excited line is the one test the missing correction cannot pass by construction: it improves it threefold and over-shoots it.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Model limitIsotopologueInversion splittingZero-point energyTunnellingConventionDouble wellWavenumberBorn–Oppenheimer separationHarmonic approximationNormal modeBond length