Density matrix — where it appears
Named by 7 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The localisation transformation, demonstrated
Four equivalent bonds or one a₁ and three t₂ — two descriptions of methane's bonding electrons that disagree about everything except the electron density, which they agree about to the last bit a double can hold.
The hole that is not repulsion
Two electrons in a bond keep out of each other's way, and the obvious reason is that they repel. Setting the repulsion to zero and computing the spin correlation exactly gives −0.125 rather than nothing, and the number is reproduced to nine decimal places by a determinant with no repulsion in it at all.
Two kinds of correlation, and only one is small
Correlation energy is defined as a subtraction, and the definition hides that the thing subtracted is not one thing. In the two-site model the local power of the correlation energy in the interaction falls from two to one — and at every interaction strength it equals, exactly, the occupation of the bonding natural orbital.
A third kind of correlation
The two-site model gave an exact identity — the power of the correlation energy in the repulsion equals the occupation of the bonding natural orbital — and asked whether anything like it survives with more orbitals. It does not, and the way it fails is better than the identity was: a ring of four gives a power of one where every closed-shell system gives two, at repulsions fifty times weaker than the hopping, because its reference was never a single state.
Two bent bonds, or a σ and a π
A carbon–carbon double bond is drawn two ways and the two look like rival claims about what is there. They are one occupied space in two bases, related by a rotation of exactly forty-five degrees: the density is identical to the last bit a double holds, the bent pair are sp⁵ hybrids at 50.77° to the axis, and their charge sits 0.235 Å off the plane of the molecule where neither canonical orbital's does.
A difference does not make a transfer
Every electronegativity scale reports one thing: how far apart two atoms are in their appetite for electrons. Put that difference into a model with repulsion in it and the charge it actually moves is not determined at all — the same difference of one moves 0.447 of an electron with no repulsion and 0.0019 with a strong one, a factor of two hundred and forty-two, and nothing on any scale distinguishes the two cases.
The give-back that turned into a saving
Take a wavefunction optimised for an on-site repulsion, weight its correlation hole with an interaction that reaches one neighbour, and the enhancement at one bond gives back forty-four per cent of the on-site saving. Putting that neighbour term into the Hamiltonian and solving exactly does not shrink the give-back. It reverses its sign.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Hubbard modelExact diagonalisationDouble occupancyElectron correlationMany-electron wavefunctionsOn-site repulsionOne-electron modelsCorrelation energyEigenvalueLocalisationUnitary transformationBasis