Molecular Geometry & Bonding
what the shape decides
Concept

Coordination — where it appears

How many neighbours a site has, which is exactly the mean of the squared level energies of the structure it sits in. Both quantities count closed walks of length two, so the identity is arithmetic rather than approximate.

Named by 7 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Five sixths of the bonds, nine tenths of the binding. What a site in the outer layer of an open block keeps, measured three ways: the fraction of its bonds, the fraction the second-moment rule predicts of its binding, and the fraction the calculation gives. The last two agree and the first does not.

A surface is not a count of broken bonds

Cut a crystal and every atom in the new face has lost one of its six neighbours. The standard estimate follows immediately: a surface costs one sixth of the cohesive energy per atom exposed. Computed, it costs a little over half that — the atom keeps 91.2 per cent of its binding while keeping only 83.3 per cent of its bonds, because the bonds that survive get stronger when their competitors are removed.

wrong · Cohesion One band width, three shapes. three densities of states, each computed from a wrapped structure of 4,096 levels and drawn against the band scaled to run from −1 to +1. A chain piles its states into the two edges; a cubic structure piles them into the middle and thins to nothing at the edges.

Where the states pile up

Two bands of the same width can be entirely different objects. Scale a chain, a square net and a cubic structure to one width and what is left varies by a factor of four — a chain puts more than half its levels in the outer thirds of its band and a cubic structure puts more than half in the middle third — and that difference alone decides how strongly each of them binds.

solids · Bands in a solid The same neighbours, and a fifth of the binding between them. five structures in which every site has 4 neighbours. Their second moments are identical — 4 for every one, which is the coordination and is what the band width is read from. Their bindings per site are not: they run from 1.28 to 1.64, and the least bound is the one with the most four-step walks.

Two structures with the same neighbours

Five structures in which every atom has exactly four neighbours. Their second moments are 4.000 to nine decimal places, because that identity is the coordination and nothing else. Their bindings per site run from 1.2756 to 1.6363 — a spread of twenty-two per cent — and two of them that agree on the second, third and fourth moments together still differ in the third decimal place.

solids · Cohesion How anisotropic a structure has to be. The fourth moment of a layered band, divided by the square of its second so that the width drops out, against the coupling between layers. The curve is the closed form that follows from adding cumulants — 3 − 3(2 + λ⁴)/(2(2 + λ²)²) — with nothing fitted; the points are eigenvalues. At λ = 1 it is the three-dimensional value 2.5 and at λ = 0 the two-dimensional 2.25, and it is halfway between them at λ = 0.47 — so the question of when a band is effectively two-dimensional has a number rather than an opinion.

Two bands, and the shape of each

A band's shape has a closed form when the structure it belongs to factorises. Put a second band beside it and the form survives exactly while the two do not talk, and fails as the square of the coupling once they do. Make one direction weaker instead and the form survives everywhere — 3 − 3(2 + λ⁴)/(2(2 + λ²)²), agreeing with eigenvalues to nine decimal places — so how anisotropic a structure has to be before its band is two-dimensional is a number: λ = 0.46518.

solids · Bands in a solid A mixture is not the average of its ends. The binding per site of a square net whose sites are of two kinds, against how many of each. The straight line is arithmetic rather than a fit: a structure of one kind only has every level shifted by ±δ, so the two ends and the line between them are known before anything is diagonalised. Every mixture lies above it — more bound — by as much as 0.43 per site at the middle, and that departure is the whole of what makes an ordered compound worth forming.

A mixture is not the average of its ends

Half of a structure's sites raised and half lowered, and the line between the two pure ends is arithmetic — no diagonalisation needed. Every mixture lies below it, by 0.42987 per site for the ordered arrangement and 0.23690 for the segregated one at the same composition, so composition fixes neither the binding nor the gap. And the departure is not quadratic in the contrast: it grows as its 1.79 power in a chain and its 1.28 power on a square net.

solids · Cohesion Two bands, square below, triangular above. The 128 levels of a structure carrying two orbitals on every one of its 64 sites, where the lower orbitals hop on a square net and the upper ones on a triangular net, separated by 12 and coupled at 0.06. The two bands have different widths and different shapes before anything mixes, which is the situation a single net cannot construct. Every level here is also reproduced by a two-by-two problem, one per mode, to 3e-13.

The constant that belonged to one net

Divide one second-order departure by another and the coupling cancels, leaving one constant times the gap — which reads as arithmetic. It was arithmetic about a square net. On a triangular one — the same graph for both bands, nothing else changed — the quotient drifts by a hundred and twenty-eight per cent.

solids · Bands in a solid The sixteen-electron gap, from a plane to a tetrahedron. The gap above eight d electrons as four ligands are folded out of a square plane towards a tetrahedron, at three π strengths. It is 2eσ exactly at the plane whatever the π strength is, and exactly zero at the tetrahedron whatever it is — the upper three levels there are the degenerate t₂ set. In between the three curves separate, and the separation is what the π channel is doing.

The gap that only a tetrahedron closes

The sixteen-electron gap is 2eσ exactly, and a square-planar π set cannot touch it because d(z²) has no partner there. Fold the ligands out of the plane and the gap survives almost intact for fifteen degrees, closes to nothing only at the tetrahedron — and loses its exactness at the very first degree.

applied · Electron count

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Band widthTight-binding modelsClosed formSecond momentCohesionDensity of statesGraphBands in a solidEnergy per siteThermodynamic limitBand fillingBand gap

All concepts