Molecular Geometry & Bonding
what the shape decides
Concept

Cohesion — where it appears

The energy holding an extended structure together, per atom. It grows more slowly than the number of neighbours because the band widens as the square root of the coordination, and more slowly still because the band's shape changes with dimension.

Named by 13 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

What holds matter together, per pair. Four kinds of interaction between two units of matter, each computed from the model named beside it, on a logarithmic energy scale. The range from top to bottom is a factor of several hundred, which is the number behind why a molecular solid melts hundreds of degrees below a covalent one.

What holds a solid together

Four kinds of interaction between two units of matter, each computed from a stated model and put on one logarithmic scale. The ordering is not the one usually taught — an ion pair at contact beats a shared pair, which is a fact about the comparison rather than about the numbers.

solids · Cohesion What holds matter together, per pair. Four kinds of interaction between two units of matter, each computed from the model named beside it, on a logarithmic energy scale. The range from top to bottom is a factor of several hundred, which is the number behind why a molecular solid melts hundreds of degrees below a covalent one.

The lattice sum that depends on the order of adding

An ionic solid's binding is the sum of every pair of charges in it, and the series does not converge absolutely — rearranged, it gives a different answer. That is a genuine mathematical difficulty rather than a technicality, and it is the clearest example of something a real-space, neighbour-by-neighbour method cannot compute at all.

solids · Cohesion A ring of 60: binding against filling. The occupied-level sum per site of a ring of 60, swept from an empty band to a full one. It rises to a maximum at half filling, falls symmetrically, and reaches exactly zero when every level is occupied. The thin curve is the closed form the finite sum approaches, and the second trace is the same sweep for the structure with ends.

Half filled is as bonded as it gets

Sweep a band from empty to full and the binding it supplies rises to a maximum at half filling and returns to exactly zero when every level is occupied. A completely filled band holds a solid together no more than a filled shell holds two helium atoms together, and for the same reason.

solids · Bands in a solid ⟨x²⟩ is the average number of neighbours. For each structure, the mean coordination counted off the edge list beside the mean of x² measured off the eigenvalues. They are equal by an identity about graphs, not by a limit — and the binding each bond supplies, in the last column, obeys no such rule and falls as neighbours are added.

The bond that weakens as neighbours multiply

Wrapped structures with two, four and six neighbours per site give a mean of x² of exactly 2, 4 and 6. Their binding per site goes 1.272, 1.611, 1.979 — and their binding per bond falls from 0.636 to 0.330, which is why a metal atom with twelve neighbours has weak bonds and a great many of them.

solids · Cohesion Face to face repels, edge to face attracts. Two benzene molecules 5 Å apart, one turned against the other, with only the quadrupole interaction between them. Stacked, the two negative faces meet and the energy is +8.8 kJ/mol; perpendicular, one molecule's positive rim meets the other's negative face and it is -4.6. The sign changes on the way, so the preference is not that one arrangement is weaker — it is that they are opposite. This is a molecule with no dipole moment at all.

Zero dipole is not no interaction

Benzene's dipole moment is exactly zero at every origin, and its quadrupole moment is large enough to decide a crystal structure. Two benzenes face to face repel by nine kilojoules a mole; edge to face they attract, and the sign changes on the way between.

shape · Dipole Five sixths of the bonds, nine tenths of the binding. What a site in the outer layer of an open block keeps, measured three ways: the fraction of its bonds, the fraction the second-moment rule predicts of its binding, and the fraction the calculation gives. The last two agree and the first does not.

A surface is not a count of broken bonds

Cut a crystal and every atom in the new face has lost one of its six neighbours. The standard estimate follows immediately: a surface costs one sixth of the cohesive energy per atom exposed. Computed, it costs a little over half that — the atom keeps 91.2 per cent of its binding while keeping only 83.3 per cent of its bonds, because the bonds that survive get stronger when their competitors are removed.

wrong · Cohesion One band width, three shapes. three densities of states, each computed from a wrapped structure of 4,096 levels and drawn against the band scaled to run from −1 to +1. A chain piles its states into the two edges; a cubic structure piles them into the middle and thins to nothing at the edges.

Where the states pile up

Two bands of the same width can be entirely different objects. Scale a chain, a square net and a cubic structure to one width and what is left varies by a factor of four — a chain puts more than half its levels in the outer thirds of its band and a cubic structure puts more than half in the middle third — and that difference alone decides how strongly each of them binds.

solids · Bands in a solid The same neighbours, and a fifth of the binding between them. five structures in which every site has 4 neighbours. Their second moments are identical — 4 for every one, which is the coordination and is what the band width is read from. Their bindings per site are not: they run from 1.28 to 1.64, and the least bound is the one with the most four-step walks.

Two structures with the same neighbours

Five structures in which every atom has exactly four neighbours. Their second moments are 4.000 to nine decimal places, because that identity is the coordination and nothing else. Their bindings per site run from 1.2756 to 1.6363 — a spread of twenty-two per cent — and two of them that agree on the second, third and fourth moments together still differ in the third decimal place.

solids · Cohesion A band becomes a bell curve, and the dimension is the sample size. The normalised fourth moment of a wrapped hypercubic structure's density of states against its dimension, with the closed form 3 − 3/2d drawn through it. They agree to eight decimal places at every dimension from one to 6, and the reason is a limit theorem: a hypercubic spectrum is the sum of d independent one-dimensional ones, so its cumulants fall as powers of d exactly as a sum of independent samples does. The Gaussian value of three is approached and never reached.

A band becomes a bell curve

The normalised fourth moment of a hypercubic structure's density of states is 3 − 3/2d exactly, from one dimension to six, to eight decimal places — because the spectrum is a sum of d independent one-dimensional ones and the central limit theorem is what it is obeying. Reach further in one dimension instead and the shape overshoots a Gaussian rather than approaching it: a chain touching its third neighbour has a cubic structure's coordination and a fourth moment of 3.389 against 2.500.

solids · Bands in a solid A mixture is not the average of its ends. The binding per site of a square net whose sites are of two kinds, against how many of each. The straight line is arithmetic rather than a fit: a structure of one kind only has every level shifted by ±δ, so the two ends and the line between them are known before anything is diagonalised. Every mixture lies above it — more bound — by as much as 0.43 per site at the middle, and that departure is the whole of what makes an ordered compound worth forming.

A mixture is not the average of its ends

Half of a structure's sites raised and half lowered, and the line between the two pure ends is arithmetic — no diagonalisation needed. Every mixture lies below it, by 0.42987 per site for the ordered arrangement and 0.23690 for the segregated one at the same composition, so composition fixes neither the binding nor the gap. And the departure is not quadratic in the contrast: it grows as its 1.79 power in a chain and its 1.28 power on a square net.

solids · Cohesion How many places a local search can stop. The number of distinct arrangements a steepest-ascent search settles at, for each net and contrast, with the fraction of starts reaching the best of them written beside it. 16 sites, contrast 1: 2 from 200 starts, best reached 67 per cent of the time; 16 sites, contrast 4: 2 from 200 starts, best reached 59 per cent of the time; 36 sites, contrast 1: 4 from 20 starts, best reached 80 per cent of the time; 36 sites, contrast 4: 12 from 20 starts, best reached 10 per cent of the time. The larger net at the larger contrast is a different kind of landscape.

Twelve basins where there were two

Sixteen sites can be searched exhaustively and thirty-six cannot, so the only instrument available past about twenty sites is a local search — and how much weaker it is has never been measured against the answer on a net where both can be run. On sixteen it is barely weaker at all. On thirty-six it fails nine starts in ten, and the arrangement it is beaten by has fewer unlike bonds than the one it starts from.

solids · Cohesion One net has a two-colouring and the other cannot. Sixteen sites wrapped into a square net and into a triangular one, with the wrapping bonds left undrawn. The square net is bipartite: its sites split into two classes with every bond running between them. The triangular net is not, and the obstruction is a triangle — three sites in a cycle of odd length cannot be two-coloured. It has thirty-two of them, two per site, and forty-eight bonds against the square net's thirty-two.

A net with no two-colouring

Half filling is the easiest composition to search and the reason given was the two-colouring: on a bipartite net it is the unique arrangement with every bond unlike, so the optimum has nothing competing with it. A triangular net has no two-colouring, its half-filled composition is reached by every one of two hundred starts, and its best arrangement is two bonds short of what counting allows.

solids · Cohesion On the frustrated net the widest gap wins everywhere but just past a change of winner. Every basin found at half filling on the triangular net, at eleven contrasts, placed by the gap it opens at the Fermi level; the winning basin is filled and the rest open, sized by how many of two hundred starts reach them. Up to a contrast of 2.5 there is one basin. From 3 a second appears, and the winner is the one with the wider gap — except at 4, where the winner has a gap of 4.947 and a runner-up has 5.088. Squares mark basins with thirty-two unlike bonds and circles thirty.

The gap follows the winner late

On a triangular net at half filling, the arrangement that binds best was expected to be the one that opens the widest gap at the Fermi level. Across twenty cases it is, eighteen times. The two exceptions are not noise: the frustrated net's winner changes at a contrast of 3.790, from an arrangement with thirty unlike bonds to one with thirty-two, and the gaps of the two do not cross until 4.849. For a whole unit of contrast the better binder has the narrower gap.

solids · Cohesion

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Tight-binding modelsGraphBand fillingBand widthEnergy per siteFillingModel limitSecond momentCoordinationDensity of statesThermodynamic limitBands in a solid

All concepts