Trigonal bipyramid — where it appears
Named by 5 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Five sites are not alike
Every other common arrangement has one or two distinct angles. Five has three, because two of its positions are on an axis and three are round an equator — and a molecule built that way does something about it.
The shapes above six coordination
Eight points on a sphere do not arrange themselves in a cube. They twist one face by forty-five degrees, and above six the arrangements stop being the ones anybody would name and start being the ones a minimisation finds.
Which angles are symmetry and which are the model
VSEPR says electron pairs repel and never says by what law. For four, five and six domains it makes no difference whatever — change the exponent by a factor of twelve and not one angle moves. For seven it decides the answer.
The sites are not the same size
Every arrangement in this collection puts its sites on one sphere, which is an assumption about bond lengths made silently. Give the repulsion model a bond length and it predicts that the long bond goes axial — the opposite of the rule the model is always cited for.
The long bond goes to the crowded site
Given one bond longer than the others, the repulsion model puts it axial in a trigonal bipyramid — against the rule it is usually cited for. The reason is a crowding count, and at seven sites the count reverses: the pentagonal bipyramid's crowded site is equatorial, so a long bond goes equatorial and a short one axial. PF₅'s long bonds are axial and IF₇'s are equatorial. And at seven the site a bond avoids is not even a minimum.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
RepulsionAxialEquatorialMinimisationVSEPRCoordination numberBond angleBond lengthLocal minimumModel limitPoint groupBent's rule