Molecular Geometry & Bonding
what the shape decides
Concept

Screening — where it appears

The reduction of a nucleus's pull on one electron by the others between it and them. Slater's rules turn a configuration into a screening constant and an effective charge, which is what lets a many-electron atom be drawn with one-electron functions at all.

Named by 8 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Two moments of the n = 2 shell, and only one of them agrees. ⟨1/r⟩ and ⟨1/r²⟩ for each orbital of the n = 2 shell of hydrogen, computed from the radial functions and checked against their closed forms. The first is the same number for every member — which is why they share an energy — and the second differs by a factor of 3 across the shell.

The degeneracy no group predicts

How many orbitals can share an energy is decided by a group before any energy is computed, and the rotation group of a central potential permits one, three, five and seven. Hydrogen's second shell has four orbitals at one energy and its third has nine. The extra degeneracy is not an accident of the arithmetic — it is the signature of a symmetry that has not been named, and it survives only for a potential that goes exactly as one over r.

symmetry · Representation A control that ranked better than the mechanism. Rank correlations against the additivity shortfall, over eight ion pairs. The overlap of the two closed shells ranks at 0.8571 — but the cation's formal charge, which cannot be a mechanism, ranks at 0.9524, so the set is confounded: its eight pairs split four and four by charge and everything else rises with it. Held fixed within a charge group the overlap still ranks at 0.80 — and so does the softness, at -1.00. Four pairs cannot separate two candidates.

A control that outranked the mechanism

Ruling polarisation out left one candidate, and the closed-shell overlap ranks at 0.857 against the additivity shortfall — which looked like the answer until the control was read. The cation's formal charge, which cannot be a mechanism, ranks at 0.9524. Eight pairs split four and four by charge cannot separate anything, and within a charge group two candidates both rank perfectly.

orbitals · Contour Eight wells, and where each one puts its pair. The total energy of each pair against separation, with the measured distance marked on every curve. The wells are deep and their minima are in the right region — tenths of an ångström from the measurements — which is what makes the comparison worth making. What they are not is closer to the measurements than the sum of two tabulated radii, and that is the result.

A size a confound cannot supply

A rank correlation of 0.857 was beaten by a control that cannot be a mechanism, so a size is the next thing to ask for: does a closed-shell repulsion of the computed magnitude displace two ions by the tenths of an ångström the additive radii are wrong by. It does not. The balance of a Madelung attraction against six computed repulsions predicts six separations to 0.242 ångström where adding two tabulated radii predicts them to 0.183, and the displacement it produces ranks at 0.14 against the shortfall it was proposed to explain.

orbitals · Contour Two events, not one — and both below the n = 2 shell's. The field at which each coupled pair's shift stops being quadratic and starts being linear, for the n = 3 shell and for the n = 2 shell. The n = 3 shell has two, a factor of 3.66 apart, and both are far below n = 2's single one — so the linear effect returns is two events in a shell with a d, and it happens at a field thirty times weaker than in a shell without one.

Two events where there was one

A broken symmetry returns at a field where the coupling matches the gap it has to overcome, and in a shell with two levels that field is a single number. The next shell up has three, two gaps and two dipoles — so there are two crossovers, a factor of 3.66 apart, both of them below the single one of the shell below, and the exponent takes more than a decade of field to travel between them.

symmetry · Representation Every crossover a shell has. The field at which each coupled pair's linear behaviour returns — the gap between the two levels divided by twice the dipole joining them — on a logarithmic axis. The n = 3 shell has 3 distinct fields rather than four, because its m = ±1 half is a two-level ladder with one coupled pair. All three are below the n = 2 shell's single one.

Three events, and a ratio of two dipoles

The m = 0 half of a shell has two crossovers because it has three levels and two coupled pairs. The other half has two levels and one, so the whole shell has three distinct fields rather than four — and two of the three share a gap exactly, which makes the ratio between them a ratio of two dipoles, 2/√3.

symmetry · Representation A fixed offset against a rising threshold. The offset at which a shell's coupled minimum disappears, against the principal quantum number, with the offset every shell's own d level actually has. The threshold is 2(n² − 4)/(5(n² − 1)) — zero at the second shell, a quarter at the third, and rising to two fifths. The shell's own offset is one fifth whatever the shell, because it comes from the reciprocal of l plus a half and carries no n at all. So the comparison is a constant against a curve, and it changes answer exactly once.

The quarter, generalised

A shell's one coupled minimum exists because its d level sits within a quarter of the s–p gap, and the quarter was found by bisecting a numerical search on one shell. It is exactly 2(n² − 4)/(5(n² − 1)) for every shell — zero at the second, a quarter at the third, two fifths in the limit — while the offset it is compared against is one fifth whatever the shell.

symmetry · Representation Only lithium's d level sits close enough to p. Each alkali's offset — how far its d level sits above p, in units of its s–p gap — at every shell from its valence shell to the thirtieth, computed from measured quantum defects, against the threshold below which a shell's s and p levels have a coupled minimum in a field. The screening model's offset of one fifth is drawn for comparison. Lithium sits below the threshold at every shell. Sodium, potassium, rubidium and caesium sit above it everywhere, by factors of 2.6 to 7.

Four alkalis the model cannot hold

A shell's s and p levels have a coupled minimum in an electric field when its d level sits within a threshold fraction of the s–p gap above p, and a screening model put every shell's d level at one fifth — inside the threshold from the third shell on, with more room the larger the defect. Computed from measured quantum defects, lithium keeps the minimum at every shell. Sodium, potassium, rubidium and caesium lose it at every shell, and the screening model has no member that resembles any of them.

symmetry · Representation The error falls along the sum of the two exponents. The ionic model's relative error on each of the six checkable separations, against the sum of the two ions' Slater exponents, with the least-squares line through all six. The rank correlation is −0.986 and only 4 of the 720 possible orderings of six points do as well, where the count of third-row ions it replaces is matched by 24. The three pairs with one third-row ion, which the count could not tell apart, fall in the order the line runs.

The sum of the exponents, not the softer ion

The row of the periodic table sorted an ionic model's errors into three groups, and a count that takes three values can say nothing inside a group. Made continuous, the variable the proposed mechanism names — how diffuse the softer ion is — carries no information: an oxide's 2p and a chloride's 3p have the same exponent to a hundredth. The sum of the two exponents carries nearly all of it, orders the middle group, and, asked about that group without having seen it, predicts its spread at twice the size.

orbitals · Contour

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Model limitDegeneracyApproximationClosed formEffective nuclear chargeIonic radiusOne-electron modelsOverlap integralQuantum defectClosed-shell configurationsConventionEigenvalue

All concepts