Polarity — where it appears
Named by 18 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Symmetry forbids a dipole
Whether a molecule can have a dipole moment follows from its point group alone. The usual argument — adding up bond vectors — gets the right answer for easy cases by a route that does not generalise.
The dipole is not a sum of bonds
Adding bond dipoles as vectors gets the easy cases right and rests on a quantity with several incompatible definitions. The symmetry argument is exact, needs no electronegativities, and says when the answer must be zero.
Electronegativity is not one quantity
Four scales, four definitions, four sets of units, and a defence — "they correlate well" — that answers a question nobody asked. Two scales can correlate at 0.99 and still put hydrogen on the wrong side of carbon.
One coordinate, three point groups
Hydrogen peroxide has four atoms and one soft internal coordinate. Turning it from nought to a hundred and eighty degrees takes the molecule through C2v, C2 and C2h — so it is chiral at every angle but two, and forbidden a dipole at exactly one of them.
What a dipole cannot tell apart
A dipole moment is three numbers extracted from a whole charge distribution, and enormously many distributions give the same three. The moment above it is not even a property of the molecule unless the one below it vanishes — which is why a quadrupole is quoted with an origin and a dipole is not.
Every group a molecule can fall to
A distortion takes a molecule's symmetry away, and what is left is not a free choice — it has to be a group. Closing subsets of methane's twenty-four operations returns thirty of them, which is exactly the number the symmetric group on four letters has.
The lone pair is not the missing term
Ammonia's dipole is 1.47 debye and nitrogen trifluoride's is 0.235, although the N–F bonds are far more polar than the N–H ones. The bond sums explain the reversal exactly and point in opposite directions — and the lone pair that is supposed to make up the difference has to be worth 0.58 debye in one molecule and at least 1.48 in the other.
A ranking is not a difference
Four electronegativity scales agree about order to a Spearman coefficient of 0.99 and disagree about size by a factor of sixty-two. Put each on its own range and the O–H bond is 39 per cent of the way across on three scales and 4.5 on the fourth.
One table, three groups
A mirror plane, a centre of inversion and a twofold axis have the same character table — two rows, entries 1, 1 and 1, −1 — and one of the three describes a chiral molecule. A character table is a property of an abstract group; a point group is that plus an action on space, and the action is what a molecule has.
Zero dipole is not no interaction
Benzene's dipole moment is exactly zero at every origin, and its quadrupole moment is large enough to decide a crystal structure. Two benzenes face to face repel by nine kilojoules a mole; edge to face they attract, and the sign changes on the way between.
A difference does not make a transfer
Every electronegativity scale reports one thing: how far apart two atoms are in their appetite for electrons. Put that difference into a model with repulsion in it and the charge it actually moves is not determined at all — the same difference of one moves 0.447 of an electron with no repulsion and 0.0019 with a strong one, a factor of two hundred and forty-two, and nothing on any scale distinguishes the two cases.
A dipole is not what an infrared spectrum sees
Carbon dioxide has no dipole moment at all and three of its four modes are infrared active. Methane has none and six of nine; boron trifluoride none and five of six. Water, which has the largest dipole of the five, has three modes and three bands — and its dipole predicted neither number.
The quantity no scale prints
Every electronegativity table is half of a calculation. The other half is the hardness — half the difference of the same two measurements the Mulliken scale is half the sum of — and it varies by a factor of 3.8 across eighteen elements. Put both halves in and B–F, with an electronegativity difference of 6.12 electronvolts, moves less charge than lithium iodide, whose difference is 3.75.
The one intensity symmetry does fix
Symmetry says which bands exist and declines to say how strong they are. It makes exactly one exception, and it is a ratio: every Raman band that is not totally symmetric is depolarised by exactly three quarters, whatever the molecule and whatever the model — and methane's symmetric stretch is polarised by exactly zero, because its group is cubic.
The value that only exists in the bond
A difference in electronegativity moves charge, and moving charge closes the difference — until every atom in the molecule has the same chemical potential. Solving that gives one number per molecule and a charge per atom, and carbon's runs from +0.0692 in methane to +0.3074 in tetrafluoromethane. Hydrogen's changes sign between the first and the second, so the same C–H bond is polarised one way in one compound and the other way in the next.
Four tables and one molecule to disagree about
A molecule of two elements is provably safe from the choice of electronegativity table, and a series down a group should land where the tables do disagree. It does. All four agree that hydrogen iodide is the exception — and they disagree about what its dipole is by 1.245 debye, which is two and a half times the 0.448 that was measured.
No panel of this kind can find an exception
Four electronegativity tables leave three exceptions to a rule for which bond polarities they dispute, and four independent coins would produce two and a half. How many tables before one exception would mean something? Ten, if tables were coins. Near the boundary they are not: they correlate at 0.32, two of the four are nearly one table, and the requirement becomes seventy-three — with a plausible range running past any panel that could exist.
The rule is not the lever
One exception among nineteen flagged bond pairs would need seventy-three electronegativity tables to mean anything, and a rule that flagged fewer pairs looked like the way to need fewer. Searched over sixty-one thousand boundaries, nineteen is already the fewest that misses no disputed pair; each missed pair buys a table or five; and a rule flagging a single pair would still need fourteen. The requirement lives in the correlation between the tables, which moves it nine times as far as any rule can.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
ElectronegativityConventionDipole momentModel limitPartial chargeBond dipolePoint groupMulliken scalePauling scaleSymmetry operationRank correlationChirality