Parity (g and u) — where it appears
Named by 8 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Exactly zero
Where symmetry forbids an interaction the overlap is not small. It is zero — and computing it and finding arithmetic noise is a different kind of statement from computing it and finding a small number.
Selection rules are one theorem
An integral over all space vanishes unless the integrand is totally symmetric. Every selection rule in spectroscopy is that sentence with a different integrand — and the rule of mutual exclusion falls out rather than being remembered.
Why a d–d band is weak
In a centrosymmetric complex the transition between the two halves of a split d shell is forbidden — exactly, by parity, with no small quantity anywhere. What makes it visible at all is that the molecule is never quite centrosymmetric, and the computation says which vibrations do the work.
Mutual exclusion does not prove a centre
A centrosymmetric molecule shows no band in both its infrared and its Raman spectrum. The rule is a theorem and its converse is read off as though it were part of it — but ferrocene in the gas phase has no centre of inversion and no coincidence either, and the reason is that a fivefold axis separates the coordinates from their products where a threefold or fourfold axis cannot.
The group of a molecule that will not hold still
A point group is a group of rotations of space, and it presupposes a structure for them to act on. Ethane has no one structure — its methyl groups turn billions of times a second — and the group that describes its spectrum has thirty-six elements where the point group has twelve, out of two thousand eight hundred and eighty conceivable.
The pair that cancels only at zero overlap
A directional Compton profile along a bond is exactly zero at π/R for every cosine combination, which makes the depth there a count of parity mismatches. A gas measurement averages over orientations, and the question was whether the count survives. It does not, for a reason nothing in the directional picture shows: the bonding and antibonding combinations of one atomic function are normalised by 2 + 2S and 2 − 2S, so a filled pair leaves a residue proportional to its overlap — and in nitrogen that residue is the largest single term, from a pair whose imbalance is zero.
The third function fills the floor
A polar σ bond built from one s function per atom has a momentum profile whose minimum at π/R never reaches zero — for carbon monoxide, 1.35 per cent of the peak. The natural hope was that a p function mixed into the diffuse atom would reshape it towards the compact one and lower that floor. It cannot. At π/R an s function on one atom and a p function on the other are exactly out of phase, so a p function on one atom cancels nothing and only adds itself. With p on both atoms in the sense that makes the bond, the pair adds fifteen times as strongly as the s pair cancels: a quarter p takes the minimum to 12.5 per cent. That is eight times the whole range through which polarity moves the s-only bond.
The lone pair sits where the floor was
A polar σ bond's momentum profile has a minimum at π/R whose floor was proposed as a measure of polarity, and the essay that swept the p weight could not say whether carbon monoxide's own σ bond sat near the s-only floor of 1.35 per cent or the quarter-p value of 12.5. With the weights computed — carbon and oxygen 2s and 2pσ, extended Hückel — the answer is that carbon monoxide has no such bond. Its lowest σ orbital reads 2.5 per cent, its middle one 8.4 per cent of its own peak, and its highest, the orbital with the lone pair's sense, has no minimum at π/R at all: it peaks there. The six σ electrons together have no minimum anywhere, and the polar molecule reads lower at π/R than nitrogen does.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Selection rulesModel limitMolecular orbitalMomentum orbitalOverlap integralPoint groupSymmetry-forbidden transitionsVibrational modesBasis setCharacter tableHybridisationIrreducible representations