Molecular Geometry & Bonding
what the shape decides
Concept

Antibonding — where it appears

An orbital combination with a node between the nuclei, whose occupation weakens the bond. It rises further above the atomic level than the bonding partner falls below it, so filling both is worse than filling neither.

Named by 15 essays across 6 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

1s with 1s at 2.8 bohr. The two orbitals in the plane containing both nuclei, with the regions where their product is positive and negative shown faintly. The overlap integral is the signed volume of that product, and where symmetry makes the two regions mirror images it comes out exactly zero. Contours drawn: 1s at 50% of its density, |ψ| = 1.48e-1; 1s at 50% of its density, |ψ| = 1.48e-1.

Overlap decides

Two orbitals interact in proportion to how much they overlap, and the sign of the overlap decides which of the two combinations is the lower in energy. It is one integral, and almost everything about bonding follows from it.

bonding · Overlap The radial function of 3s. The radial part of the wavefunction, which changes sign at each node, and the radial distribution, which is the probability of finding the electron in a shell at that radius. The second vanishes at the nucleus and the first does not.

Nodes

An orbital with quantum numbers n and l has exactly n−l−1 radial nodes and l angular ones. That is a count, it is exact, and it is the fastest way to catch a drawing that is wrong.

orbitals · Orbital Donation strengthens the C–O bond, back-donation weakens it. Two interactions computed as two-level problems: 0.39 of an electron donated out of the ligand's σ orbital, worth 0.06 on the C–O bond order, and 0.5 donated back into π*, worth -0.4. Beside them, six measured stretching frequencies: five isoelectronic species differing only in charge, and free CO.

Back-bonding is two interactions

A carbon monoxide molecule bound to a metal donates from an orbital that is slightly antibonding and accepts into one that is strongly antibonding, so the two halves of the bonding move its stretching frequency in opposite directions. Five isoelectronic complexes differing only in charge settle which wins — and one of them stretches above free CO.

applied · Electron count Overlap against separation, Z = 3.25. How the overlap integral falls as two atoms are pulled apart, for several pairs of orbitals. Where a closed form exists it is drawn over the computed curve, so the integrator is checked rather than trusted.

A double bond is not two single bonds

Carbon's single bond is 348 kilojoules a mole and its double is 614, which is not twice anything. The two halves are different integrals over different orbitals with different distance dependence, and computing them shows why no arithmetic could have made them add.

wrong · Overlap Two orbitals, 4 electrons, S = 0 and S = 0.25. Two interacting orbitals with 4 electrons in them, drawn twice: once with the overlap set to zero and once with it kept at 0.25. Dropping the overlap makes the two shifts equal, which is the picture usually taught; keeping it makes the upper level rise by more than the lower falls, which is why four electrons in two orbitals is a repulsion.

The antibonding level goes up more

The two-level diagram every course draws is symmetric, and the symmetry is an artefact of setting the overlap to zero. Keep it, and the upper level rises further than the lower one falls — which is why helium has no molecule and why closed shells push each other apart.

bonding · Overlap Two orbitals, 2 electrons, S = 0 and S = 0.2. Two interacting orbitals with 2 electrons in them, drawn twice: once with the overlap set to zero and once with it kept at 0.2. Dropping the overlap makes the two shifts equal, which is the picture usually taught; keeping it makes the upper level rise by more than the lower falls, which is why four electrons in two orbitals is a repulsion.

Overlap is not interaction

Two orbitals interact by the square of their coupling divided by the distance between them in energy. A coupling half again as large, with a gap four times worse, buys a third less stabilisation — so the pair that overlaps best is often not the pair that bonds best.

applied · Overlap A ring of 60: binding against filling. The occupied-level sum per site of a ring of 60, swept from an empty band to a full one. It rises to a maximum at half filling, falls symmetrically, and reaches exactly zero when every level is occupied. The thin curve is the closed form the finite sum approaches, and the second trace is the same sweep for the structure with ends.

Half filled is as bonded as it gets

Sweep a band from empty to full and the binding it supplies rises to a maximum at half filling and returns to exactly zero when every level is occupied. A completely filled band holds a solid together no more than a filled shell holds two helium atoms together, and for the same reason.

solids · Bands in a solid Overlap does not always fall as the atoms are pulled apart. The overlap integral of two pairs of orbitals against the separation between their centres, with the turning point and the sign change of each found by bisection on the integral itself. A pair with a radial node in it does not fall monotonically and does not keep one sign.

Closer is not more overlap

Two 1s orbitals overlap more the closer they are, and every curve drawn from that pair says the same thing. Put a radial node into one of them and the rule fails: a 1s with a 2s overlaps by 0.016 at contact, by 0.282 near four bohr, and less again beyond — and two 2p orbitals head-on change sign at 5.06 bohr and are more strongly coupled at eight bohr than at four.

bonding · Overlap A σ contour at 90 per cent, and the two atomic ones. The section through both nuclei of the surface enclosing 90 per cent of the bonding orbital's density at 2 bohr, with circles marking where two atomic contours of the same stated fraction would be. The two pictures are different shapes and enclose different amounts, and the atomic pair encloses 91.70 per cent of the molecular orbital's density. Contours drawn: 1s at 90% of its density, |ψ| = 3.94e-2.

A bond is not two atoms overlapping

The surface enclosing ninety per cent of a σ orbital's density is one closed surface with both nuclei inside it, at a level of 0.0359. The two atomic surfaces usually drawn instead sit at 0.0394, are a different shape, and enclose 91.70 per cent of the same orbital — and whether the molecular one is one object or two is decided by the fraction the caption claims, anywhere between 2.1 and 5.2 ångström.

orbitals · Contour Three bands of one spectrum, and the bond length behind each. Nitrogen's three photoelectron bands, drawn as the vibrational intensity distributions computed from the measured bond lengths and vibrational constants of the three states of the ion. Each band's lines add to one. The middle band is spread over five lines because the electron removed came out of a strongly bonding orbital and the bond lengthened by 77.22 thousandths of an ångström; the outer two keep 92 and 88 per cent of their strength in a single line.

The width of a band is a bond length

Nitrogen's three photoelectron bands are one sharp line, a progression of five, and a line with a shoulder. Computed from the measured bond lengths of the three states of the ion, the intensities come out at 0.917, 0.263 and 0.880 in the first line of each — because removing a weakly bonding electron lengthens the bond by 18.7 thousandths of an ångström, a strongly bonding one by 77.2, and an antibonding one shortens it by 23.7.

spectra · Photoelectron Where two He atoms stop, with no contact distance put in. The repulsion between two He atoms, computed from the overlap of their filled valence orbitals — four electrons in a bonding and an antibonding pair, of which the antibonding one rises further — against London's dispersion attraction from the measured polarisability and ionisation energy. The minimum is at 3.14 ångström where the tabulated van der Waals contact is 2.8, and nothing anywhere in the calculation is a length.

The radius that was tabulated

A van der Waals radius is a fitted number that every structural argument in chemistry uses. Computing it instead — a repulsion taken from computed overlap integrals, an attraction taken from two measured scalars, and no length anywhere — puts helium's contact at 3.140 ångström against a tabulated 2.80, neon's at 3.226 against 3.08 and argon's at 3.996 against 3.76. And the surface two atoms actually stop at encloses 99.4 per cent of the density, not ninety.

orbitals · Contour The bonding follows the overlap over, and turns where it turns. The stabilisation of three pairs of orbitals against how far apart they are, each scaled to its own largest, with the coupling taken from the computed overlap. Two orbitals with no radial node are stabilised less at every separation further out; the two with one turn over — and the maximum of the bonding is at exactly the separation of maximum overlap, to five decimal places, because a coupling proportional to the overlap makes the stabilisation a strictly increasing function of it.

The same overlap, a different bond

A 1s and a 2s change their overlap by two thirds between two and seven bohr, and change what they are bonded by by 0.154 per cent. The overlap turns over and the bonding turns over with it, at exactly the same separation to five decimal places — the arithmetic refused the expectation that the secular denominators would move it — and what separates one pair from another is not where the maximum is but how little of it there is.

wrong · Overlap The pair's regime is not a property of the pair. How much the pair's bonding responds to its own overlap — the ratio of what it is bonded by at an overlap of 0.4 to what it is bonded by at 0.1 — with and without a third orbital coupled to both. Alone it is 11.83, which is the regime in which bonding tracks overlap. With a third orbital present it falls to 1.46, 0.92, 0.74 — and two of those are below one, meaning a fourfold increase in the overlap between the two atoms buys them less bonding rather than more. The coupling comes from the overlap by the Wolfsberg–Helmholz rule with K = 1.75, which is fitted rather than derived. Every stabilisation here inherits that; the shape of the curve against separation does not, because K is a constant.

A regime that belongs to the neighbours

Two orbitals at the same energy are bonded in proportion to their overlap and two far apart are barely bonded at all — two regimes, and the natural question is whether the regime is a property of the pair. It is not. Put a third orbital beside them and the pair's response to its own overlap falls from twelvefold to less than one: more overlap buys less bonding.

wrong · Overlap The filled orbital at 3 bohr, with a node in the middle of the bond. The combination the two-level model puts lower at 3 bohr, drawn as contours of the wavefunction with the two signs in the two colours. The overlap here is 0.4825, so the interaction is of the sign that fills the plus combination. There is a nodal plane through the midpoint: the pair the model calls bonded has no density at all between its nuclei.

A bond with nothing in the middle

Two head-on 2p functions have an overlap that changes sign at 5.03 bohr, and the picture of what that means is worth drawing. Below that separation the combination the model fills has a nodal plane through the midpoint of the bond, so two electrons in it put exactly nothing between the nuclei; above it the same model fills the other one. Which picture a bonding orbital has is decided by a separation.

bonding · Overlap A pair with no overlap, and a third orbital swept past it. The three levels of a trio in which the two outer orbitals have exactly no overlap with each other, as the third orbital's energy is swept. The middle line is at -13.6 at every point — the antisymmetric combination of the two, which has no partner of its own symmetry and cannot mix with anything. The other two move, so the pair is split by an orbital it has no direct contact through.

A bond order between atoms that do not interact

A diatomic held where its overlap changes sign has no interaction between its two orbitals at all — which is what the sign change of its overlap means. Put a third orbital beside it and the pair is still split, one line sits exactly at the free-atom energy at every third-orbital energy, and the bond order between the two runs to −0.9999. Three measures of the same bond disagree completely.

wrong · Overlap

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Overlap integralBondingModel limitMolecular orbitalClosed formConventionClosed-shell configurationsσ bondingBond orderContour levelEigenvalueOne-electron models

All concepts