VSEPR — the series
-
VSEPR, computed
The tetrahedral angle is not 109.5 degrees because a textbook says so. It is arccos(−1/3), and it falls out of minimising the repulsion of four points on a sphere without ever being written down.
-
Five sites are not alike
Every other common arrangement has one or two distinct angles. Five has three, because two of its positions are on an axis and three are round an equator — and a molecule built that way does something about it.
-
Why water is bent
The standard answer is lone pair repulsion, it predicts the right direction, and it cannot predict the magnitude. A better rule can, and the heavier hydrides show where both accounts run out.
-
The shapes above six coordination
Eight points on a sphere do not arrange themselves in a cube. They twist one face by forty-five degrees, and above six the arrangements stop being the ones anybody would name and start being the ones a minimisation finds.
-
Bent's rule, against the substituent series
More electronegative substituents get more p character, so the angle between them shrinks. The rule predicts a trend, the trend is observed, and the quantity it depends on turns out not to be one quantity.
-
What a lone pair is worth
A lone pair repels more than a bonding pair, says VSEPR, without saying how much more. Put a number on it and fit that number to water, and the same number is wrong for hydrogen sulfide by a factor of two — which means it was never a property of a lone pair.
-
Which angles are symmetry and which are the model
VSEPR says electron pairs repel and never says by what law. For four, five and six domains it makes no difference whatever — change the exponent by a factor of twelve and not one angle moves. For seven it decides the answer.
-
VSEPR does not reach a transition metal
Four ligands minimising their repulsion give a tetrahedron, whatever the metal. Half the four-coordinate complexes of the platinum group are square planar, which has larger repulsion, and the term that overrules it is largest at d⁸ and exactly zero at d⁰ and d¹⁰ — which is where the repulsion rule works again.
-
The sites are not the same size
Every arrangement in this collection puts its sites on one sphere, which is an assumption about bond lengths made silently. Give the repulsion model a bond length and it predicts that the long bond goes axial — the opposite of the rule the model is always cited for.
-
The long bond goes to the crowded site
Given one bond longer than the others, the repulsion model puts it axial in a trigonal bipyramid — against the rule it is usually cited for. The reason is a crowding count, and at seven sites the count reverses: the pentagonal bipyramid's crowded site is equatorial, so a long bond goes equatorial and a short one axial. PF₅'s long bonds are axial and IF₇'s are equatorial. And at seven the site a bond avoids is not even a minimum.
-
The ring held flat by its long bonds
Given iodine heptafluoride's own composition — five long bonds and two short — the repulsion model puts the short pair on the axis, as the molecule does, and keeps the equatorial ring flat. But the flatness is the softest thing in the arrangement by a factor of a hundred. With equal bonds, a pucker of the ring costs nothing at all to second order under an inverse-square law and lowers the energy under any steeper one. What holds IF₇'s ring flat is the four per cent by which its ring bonds are longer, and that holds only under laws softer than about the 4.4th power.
-
The fluorines' range decides the ring
IF₇'s flat ring was held by its bond lengths under every repulsion softer than about 1/r^4.4, with the fluorines left out. Put them back as a second set of repelling points and under the same law they change nothing at all — they sit on the same rays, and the model cannot tell where along a ray a point sits. They matter only as a contact repulsion of a different shape. Then a steep power puckers the ring with a few thousandths of the energy. An exponential contact puckers it only if its range is under 0.346 ångström, and a longer one holds it flatter. Fluorine's own orbital gives a range near 0.16. And the ring that puckers does not settle: its envelope and its twist differ by a ten-thousandth of the pucker's depth, so the pucker runs round the ring.
-
The lone pair goes through a face
Xenon hexafluoride is the other famously floppy seven-domain molecule, and its seventh domain is a lone pair: a domain with no atom at its end, which a contact repulsion between fluorines cannot see. With the domains alone the model puts the lone pair on the axis of a pentagonal bipyramid at every lone-pair weight — a pentagonal pyramid of fluorines. Add the six fluorines' contact repulsion and, past a share of the energy that rises with the lone pair's weight, the lowest structure becomes a distorted octahedron with the lone pair through one face. Every contact law tried does this. On the way the lone pair leaves the axis continuously, and past it the molecule's floppiness is the lone pair hopping from face to face over an edge — not a ring's pucker moving round a ring.
-
A lone pair weaker than a bond
The repulsion model put xenon hexafluoride's lone pair on an axis at every weight VSEPR allows, and only a contact between the fluorines could move it into a face. Below the weight VSEPR allows — a lone pair that repels less than a bond, which is what an inactive pair is — it goes into a face on its own. As the weight falls to zero the distorted octahedron becomes a regular one continuously, at 58.5° of angle spread per unit weight; and between the face and the axis there is a region nobody had looked at, where the lone pair sits over an edge.
-
The model lengthens the wrong three
Xenon hexafluoride's capped octahedron has its three longer bonds round the face the lone pair opens. Give the repulsion model three long bonds and three short and ask where it puts them: wherever the face is its lowest structure — at every lone-pair weight and every contact share mapped — it puts the long three on the opposite side. The lone pair's push on its neighbours and the fluorines' push on each other nearly cancel, and the lone pair wins only above a weight of 0.727, where the face has already given way to the edge.
-
The lone pair has no bond to stretch
Put every one of xenon hexafluoride's bonds on a spring and let the repulsion set the six lengths, and which three come out long is decided by something the model has never had to say: how far from the xenon the lone pair sits once the bonds have moved. Three equally defensible answers give three different verdicts — and none of them produces a split within a factor of twenty of the measured one without stretching every bond beyond recognition.