Aromaticity — the series
-
Aromaticity as a computed shell closure
Hückel's 4n+2 rule is not a rule. It is what comes out when every ring size is filled and asked whether its highest occupied shell came out full — and the calculation that answers does not know the phrase.
-
Delocalisation is stabilising, and other things that are false in general
Spreading electrons over more centres is supposed to lower their energy. Cyclobutadiene is delocalised in exactly the same sense as benzene, gains exactly nothing by it, and the arithmetic says so before any experiment does.
-
The vibration that lowers the symmetry
A molecule in a degenerate electronic state distorts until the degeneracy is gone. Which distortion it needs is a direct product; whether it wins is a race between a π energy falling linearly and a σ frame resisting quadratically, and both powers are measured here.
-
The same ring, three charges
Three carbons in a ring are aromatic with two π electrons, a doublet with three, and a triplet with a delocalisation energy of exactly zero with four. Nothing about the molecule changed but the count, and adding electrons to a π system can make its π binding energy fall.
-
The ring with a twist in it
Reverse the sign of one resonance integral in a ring and its levels stop being one nodeless orbital above degenerate pairs and become degenerate pairs all the way up. The count that closes a shell changes from 4n+2 to 4n, and every aromatic ring size and antiaromatic ring size exchange places.
-
The ring's levels are its group's characters
The Hückel energies of a cyclic system are twice the real part of the characters of its own rotation group, so the level pattern — one level, then pairs, then one more if the ring is even — is a group theorem rather than a calculation. Hückel's 4n+2 rule is a statement about the representations of a cyclic group and about nothing else.
-
Two rules that share no arithmetic
Hückel's rule is a statement about a gap. Put a magnetic flux through the same rings instead and ask which of them push the field out, and the answer is the same set — eighty cases, no exceptions — although the second calculation counts nothing and has no shells in it. And the rings the rule excludes turn out to have no magnetic susceptibility at all: their energy has a corner at zero field.
-
The current does not divide
A fused ring system's response was computed from the areas of its rings, and the obvious next question was whether the current divides between them the way it divides between two resistors. Giving each ring its own flux and taking the second derivatives says no: the response is a matrix, its off-diagonal entries are nearly half its diagonal ones, and anthracene's middle ring carries 1.18 times what its outer rings do.
-
A reach that has no length
A ring current's response to a neighbouring ring falls with distance, which invites asking for the length. Every acene computed gives a longer one — 1.397, 1.669, 1.896, 2.104, 2.302 rings — because the gap that would set the length is closing at the same time. Give the same molecule a gap that stays open and the number settles at 0.636 by the third one and does not move.
-
Neither of the two separations
A linear acene cannot pose the question, because the number of fusions between two rings and the distance between their centres are the same variable there. Bending the molecule pulls them apart — and the response follows neither. Two pairs of rings the same distance apart differ by two thirds, and the larger one is at the greater distance.
-
An end effect with two signs
Neither of two separations accounts for the scatter in a fused ring system's response, and the natural guess is the end: pairs with more molecule outboard should behave differently from pairs at an edge. They do. In a straight chain an end pair responds a third less than an interior one, in a zigzag a quarter more, and in a chain of two straight arms meeting at one angular ring the anomaly is in the middle.
-
One integer, and everything it changes
Eight molecules with the same rings, the same carbons and the same graph distance between every pair, differing in which fusion's direction is turned — one angular ring when the turned fusion is at an end, two adjacent ones anywhere else. The scatter within a separation class runs from three to four and a half times, against a straight chain's one and a half — and the two ends of one molecule disagree by up to a factor of four.
-
The scatter counts angular rings
Eight nine-ring chains built by turning one fusion looked like one bend moved along a molecule. They were two families: one angular ring when the turned fusion is at an end, two adjacent angular rings everywhere else. Built from stated angular rings instead, twenty-seven chains show the ring-current scatter ignores which way a ring turns, does not grow with how many turn, and is mostly explained by one count per pair — each angular ring between two rings multiplies their response by 0.60, each one under them by 0.65.