Coherence length — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The exponent was the floor
Fitting the local decay rate against the reciprocal distance reads a power off the slope. It runs from 0.41 to 0.66 across ten stiffnesses and appears to settle near two thirds. It is not settling. The tail is dropping below the arithmetic's own floor sooner at every step, so each case's power is taken over a shorter piece of the curve than the last.
The rule of thumb was on the flat part
Fitting the Peierls tail discards the first few bonds of every profile, on a rule of thumb — three coherence lengths. Does that unexamined choice hide a second exponent? It does not. From six bonds outward the fitted power moves by half a per cent to nine; below six it moves seven times as much, and starting at two would have halved the very trend the fit reports.
The other window was a plateau too
Sweeping where the fit begins finds a plateau. The far end is the other window and nobody had swept it: inside each profile's own reach the exponent moves by at most 5.3 per cent, and past that reach every larger window returns exactly the same fit — because there are no more points to add. What the reach is depends on the stiffness, and for half the series it is an arbitrary rule rather than the physics.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Bond alternationExtrapolationNumerical precisionPeierls distortionTight-binding modelsApproximationModel limitBand gap